Road King - 103ci or 103ci?
#12
#13
#14
Depends what you are going to do with it. If you plan to ride less than 2000 miles a year, I would probably go for the cool facter. I have a 1999 evo softail I ride around town for fun. It gets about 1500 miles a year at best. No way I would ride it from coast to coast because my 09 RKC is a much better bike for that purpose.
Beary
Beary
#15
I think I am seeing a pattern here.
I haven't ridden the newer RK and only went to see the 03 that was for sale. I tell you when he cranked up that stroker it gave me goose bumps.
I have the 07 FXDB and wondering if how much difference there is between the 96 and the 103 on the butt dyno? I love the power in the Bob and wondering if the extra weight on the RK is going to detract from that.
I have dreams of doing some touring but that is all it is at this point. Still a couple of years from making it a reality.
I haven't ridden the newer RK and only went to see the 03 that was for sale. I tell you when he cranked up that stroker it gave me goose bumps.
I have the 07 FXDB and wondering if how much difference there is between the 96 and the 103 on the butt dyno? I love the power in the Bob and wondering if the extra weight on the RK is going to detract from that.
I have dreams of doing some touring but that is all it is at this point. Still a couple of years from making it a reality.
#16
I have done some searches and I already have TMI. I went to look at a 2003 Screamin Eagle the other day and I was very impressed. Looked good, sounded good, good price, but I didn't have enough knowledge to drop the check. Was a good deal and if I knew what I know now....
2003 Screamin Eagle Road King (CVO) has a stock 103 stroker. $12k to $14k around here.
2012 Road King has a stock 103. $14k to start.
Which one would you choose?
Also interested in comments as I know there is a lot of support for the 09 models. Maybe a built 09 would be best?
Just a little about my interests - I am all for technology, if it works, so new is not necessarily better. Reliability and long term cost of ownership are the words that trip my trigger. So let me know what you think.
2003 Screamin Eagle Road King (CVO) has a stock 103 stroker. $12k to $14k around here.
2012 Road King has a stock 103. $14k to start.
Which one would you choose?
Also interested in comments as I know there is a lot of support for the 09 models. Maybe a built 09 would be best?
Just a little about my interests - I am all for technology, if it works, so new is not necessarily better. Reliability and long term cost of ownership are the words that trip my trigger. So let me know what you think.
#18
ABS, Cruise Control, but you had me at the 6 gallon tank and 6 speed. Frame rides better, but for most that in itself in not significant. CVO is nice and if you love the paint, well you have to love your bike. For just the riding experience, ie view from the handlebars, I'd pick the '12 without a second thought.
#19
Seems like there are folks on both sides of the fence, and I'm not surprised by that.
Here's my 02 worth. I currently have a 2002 CVO Road King with some engine mods (103cid, increased compression and cams) and backed by a Baker 6 speed. I love it!
I came off a 2012 Ultra Limited and logged 23,000 miles on it before going back to an early bike. I never liked the Ultra Limited from day one. I thought it was lethargic, and it warped front brake rotors just looking at them. Three sets in just over 20,000 miles. I poured a lot of money at it, to get fuel economy up over 40mpg's and decent power from it, but I always thought it was somewhat of a "turd" compared to the three other early bikes I've owned.
Part of the reason I came to hate the 2012 Ultra was the fact that one of the guys we ride with had a near box-stock 2012 CVO Ultra, and he got nearly 10 MORE MPG"s than my bike was getting with twice the power!!! It was embarrassing at times to ride the same distance, get left in the dust a number of times, then buy MORE fuel when we stopped for fill-ups!
Prior to the Limited I had a 2003 Road King for 40,000 miles, and prior to that a stone stock 2001 Electra Glide Standard for over 25,000 miles.
To be real honest, I like the Road King platform better, and the older engines. The 2012 103 is "weak", especially right "out of the box". You've got to gut the factory CAT or get a decent set of down pipes, and really should replace the emission cams if you want to get anything out of that engine.
My 2002 CVO is a Rocket, and the 2003 Road King I had before the Ultra was a strong runner as well. The 5 speed is the only real thing to upgrade, IMHO. The rest of the deal is mostly bling, or simply just not much of an upgrade over the early bikes.
The only real problem with the pre-2007 twin cams are the cam chain tensioners. Some folks get 60,000 to 100,000 out of them, where others kill them under 30,000. Doesn't seem to be much consistency there, but other than that the engines are bulletproof, and not smogged down with poor flowing exhaust and retarded cam timing......FWIW......Cliff
Here's my 02 worth. I currently have a 2002 CVO Road King with some engine mods (103cid, increased compression and cams) and backed by a Baker 6 speed. I love it!
I came off a 2012 Ultra Limited and logged 23,000 miles on it before going back to an early bike. I never liked the Ultra Limited from day one. I thought it was lethargic, and it warped front brake rotors just looking at them. Three sets in just over 20,000 miles. I poured a lot of money at it, to get fuel economy up over 40mpg's and decent power from it, but I always thought it was somewhat of a "turd" compared to the three other early bikes I've owned.
Part of the reason I came to hate the 2012 Ultra was the fact that one of the guys we ride with had a near box-stock 2012 CVO Ultra, and he got nearly 10 MORE MPG"s than my bike was getting with twice the power!!! It was embarrassing at times to ride the same distance, get left in the dust a number of times, then buy MORE fuel when we stopped for fill-ups!
Prior to the Limited I had a 2003 Road King for 40,000 miles, and prior to that a stone stock 2001 Electra Glide Standard for over 25,000 miles.
To be real honest, I like the Road King platform better, and the older engines. The 2012 103 is "weak", especially right "out of the box". You've got to gut the factory CAT or get a decent set of down pipes, and really should replace the emission cams if you want to get anything out of that engine.
My 2002 CVO is a Rocket, and the 2003 Road King I had before the Ultra was a strong runner as well. The 5 speed is the only real thing to upgrade, IMHO. The rest of the deal is mostly bling, or simply just not much of an upgrade over the early bikes.
The only real problem with the pre-2007 twin cams are the cam chain tensioners. Some folks get 60,000 to 100,000 out of them, where others kill them under 30,000. Doesn't seem to be much consistency there, but other than that the engines are bulletproof, and not smogged down with poor flowing exhaust and retarded cam timing......FWIW......Cliff