TOAK the Thread Of All Knowledge VIII
I have a feeling that they might be with one of the parents. Lease and utilities were in her name so she already has a record of non payment and judgments against her in court. he just got a job a week ago, they'd never survive any type of background check.
If I were the owner, I'd refile in court for all the additional costs since the first judgement. He has to be out around $6K by now and file for garnishment of her wages. Time to give them a gift that keeps on giving. Even if it's $20/month. I 'd give the money to the animal shelter........
If I were the owner, I'd refile in court for all the additional costs since the first judgement. He has to be out around $6K by now and file for garnishment of her wages. Time to give them a gift that keeps on giving. Even if it's $20/month. I 'd give the money to the animal shelter........
Tracy, that's the basis the owner and Atty. were going on.
Yep. In my early days as a slum lord I had to deal with a couple folks like that. I was too eager to get somebody into the property and failed to see that I was better off having it empty for a month or 2 rather than renting to the first that came along.
Now, all applicants go through a rather extensive vetting process that has saved me big bucks through the years..
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southeast Michigan 15 Minutes East Of Hell
Posts: 149,112
Received 49,821 Likes
on
19,322 Posts
Section 8 .... You have to wonder about a Government plan that names itself after another Government plan that relates to this.
The article currently describes Section 8 as being an "undesirable" discharge, but this is not one of the four types listed in the military discharge article. What is the exact type of discharge that Section 8 produces? --137.22.3.33 14:15, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
It is a dishonorable discharge. --Victor 03:23, 27 November 2005 (UTC)According to Infoplease, there is a term undesirable discharge but it merely refers to a discharge that is not honorable. It has no specific meaning. Superm401 - Talk 01:17, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
I do not think it is a dishonorable discharge. A dishonorable discharge can only be imposed by a General Court Martial as a punishment for a crime and it is the civilian equivalent of a felony conviction. Does a Section 8 Discharge even exist anymore? Rws1 04:38, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Basically, this applies to the U.S. military. A Section 8 is a type of dishonorable discharge granted for sexual deviancy, and was normally used to discharge homosexuals from the military. It hasn't been used much since the U.S. military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy came into effect during the Clinton administration.
The article currently describes Section 8 as being an "undesirable" discharge, but this is not one of the four types listed in the military discharge article. What is the exact type of discharge that Section 8 produces? --137.22.3.33 14:15, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
It is a dishonorable discharge. --Victor 03:23, 27 November 2005 (UTC)According to Infoplease, there is a term undesirable discharge but it merely refers to a discharge that is not honorable. It has no specific meaning. Superm401 - Talk 01:17, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
I do not think it is a dishonorable discharge. A dishonorable discharge can only be imposed by a General Court Martial as a punishment for a crime and it is the civilian equivalent of a felony conviction. Does a Section 8 Discharge even exist anymore? Rws1 04:38, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Basically, this applies to the U.S. military. A Section 8 is a type of dishonorable discharge granted for sexual deviancy, and was normally used to discharge homosexuals from the military. It hasn't been used much since the U.S. military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy came into effect during the Clinton administration.
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southeast Michigan 15 Minutes East Of Hell
Posts: 149,112
Received 49,821 Likes
on
19,322 Posts