Sportster Models 883, 883 Custom, 1200 Custom, 883L, 1200L, 1200S, 1200 Roadster, XR1200, and the Nightster.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

82hp 74tq good?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 04-04-2014, 08:49 PM
jlp29's Avatar
jlp29
jlp29 is offline
Intermediate
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Earth
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chgofirefighter
SE Cams??? Well, thats the first bad mistake. Woods, Andrews would be a better choice. My bike pulls over 105hp and 94+hp torque... But those numbers aren't that bad IMO, unless of course you want to heavily modify your bike, spend over 5k in engine work, like I did! Well, per se, I didn't spend that much but the previous owner did...
What mods did you go with to get 94+ hp torque? Very impressive, most results I've seen only get mid 80's for torque
 
  #12  
Old 04-04-2014, 09:32 PM
Von_Zipper's Avatar
Von_Zipper
Von_Zipper is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana
Posts: 1,880
Received 62 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

SE cams are made by Andrews. SE by itself is good for nothing. They just re-brand the stuff they sell and mark it up.
 
  #13  
Old 04-05-2014, 12:53 AM
rocketmangb's Avatar
rocketmangb
rocketmangb is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 365
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Those numbers are just fine Drjo
A Mikuni will add about 1.5 HP up stairs but the throttle response is better than the CV40.

That bike made about 57 HP stock
 
  #14  
Old 04-05-2014, 08:02 AM
Madnss's Avatar
Madnss
Madnss is offline
Grand HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: river
Posts: 3,714
Received 1,107 Likes on 590 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Von_Zipper
SE cams are made by Andrews. SE by itself is good for nothing. They just re-brand the stuff they sell and mark it up.
Hd comes up with the cam profiles.....not Andrews.

It's about like clutch packs. I'll let you figure that out.
 
  #15  
Old 04-05-2014, 09:20 AM
ib5150's Avatar
ib5150
ib5150 is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,340
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Madnss
I disagree somewhat. There are a lot of variables...thats for sure. On my hammer builds i am with in a few hp of what they tell me the bike should bring.

Maybe i should say this, there are a lot of shops out there with dynos......cough....hd shops that dont put a full tune on the bike. beat every last once out of it.

The dyno is a tool for tuning. nothing wrong with chasing numbers as long as you keep using the same dyno. Most guys give up on the dyno chasing numbers because it can get expensive and most fail at it.
I had a local Harley performance shop install my PCV and dyno custom tune the motor, I was a little setback at the numbers especially after looking at others dyno sheets on this forum.

A few months later at the 2013 Laughlin Bike week Power Commander had their dyno there so I had them checkout the tune, they said they made some tweaks to it and the numbers were a lot better, I was happy at least till I got back home and showed the local Performance shop the dyno sheet, the owner put my bike back on his dyno Free of Charge to see it for himself and the number were the same as he got the first time.

The Owner of the Harley Performance shop told me that some dyno operators feel the need to show high numbers to the motorcycle owner to justify the cost of the tune/dyno so the only real tweaking they do is to the dyno or they cheat during the testing to make the numbers higher than what they truly are.

What I learned from this experience is it is better to have the bike dyno'ed by someone you trust because reality doesn't always give you what you want.
 
  #16  
Old 04-05-2014, 10:04 AM
rocketmangb's Avatar
rocketmangb
rocketmangb is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 365
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I'm a bit skeptical about that 94 TQ number as well
Like to see that dyno chart.
 
  #17  
Old 04-05-2014, 10:32 AM
cHarley's Avatar
cHarley
cHarley is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Boynton Beach, FloriDuh
Posts: 16,320
Received 302 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rocketmangb
I'm a bit skeptical about that 94 TQ number as well
Like to see that dyno chart.
You're not the only one.
I'm assuming he's posting his Street Glide numbers, because he lists the Iron as a 1200, not even a 1250. To pull a 94TQ he would need either a 88"/90" motor or a dyno operator that stroked him by fudging the numbers.



BTW, aren't you supposed to be out breaking that bike in?
 
  #18  
Old 04-05-2014, 11:05 AM
rocketmangb's Avatar
rocketmangb
rocketmangb is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 365
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

LOL !
Doing intake seals on an 883 with Wedge this morning and then about a 100 miles !
Thanks.

And yeah thats the Street Glide or an 88-90 or flat BS !

I could take a raw dyno file from a Dynojet of say 82 and make it 88 or so but 94 is BS
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SA66
Engine Mechanical Topics
19
03-23-2019 11:43 AM
Yo_Boss
Engine Mechanical Topics
39
09-24-2016 05:36 AM
peg20
Softail Models
19
09-29-2015 07:18 PM
bigzig89
Softail Models
12
03-28-2013 12:17 AM
THABULL
Touring Models
51
10-13-2009 09:55 PM



Quick Reply: 82hp 74tq good?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 AM.