Which should I choose? Head-scratcher!
#1
Which should I choose? Head-scratcher!
Hey guys, I'm trying to get a sportster and now I'm down to two bikes.
One is a 05 883L with 10k miles and clean with no accident. Looks great.
One is a 06 883L with 2k miles and clean title, but an accident. The owner told me it was a small accident from the previous owner and he still rode it for 1,300 miles. I verified from carfax and the accident was from way before.
I'm okay with the price but stuck in deciding which to choose.
ps: Should I take the bike to a HD dealer and have them checked?
One is a 05 883L with 10k miles and clean with no accident. Looks great.
One is a 06 883L with 2k miles and clean title, but an accident. The owner told me it was a small accident from the previous owner and he still rode it for 1,300 miles. I verified from carfax and the accident was from way before.
I'm okay with the price but stuck in deciding which to choose.
ps: Should I take the bike to a HD dealer and have them checked?
#2
#4
A "well seasoned" bike will be a better ride than one that has sat most of its life, especially if they are carbed.
You really don't want to get into a super-low-mileage older bike. Once you start in on it, you'll never stop. Stagnation is the killer of most machines, and you'll be rebuilding/retuning the carb, dumping the gas, maybe replacing gas lines or even the tank depending on corrosion/age of fuel, cleaning out oil passages, brake lines, brakes themselves, wiring may have gotten corroded, rust issues maybe, etc. etc. etc... This is why the 25k on my '01 was a welcome sight; she's a bike that's been ridden extensively by someone who loved the crap out of her and proved it by taking her out all the time. <3
- CK
You really don't want to get into a super-low-mileage older bike. Once you start in on it, you'll never stop. Stagnation is the killer of most machines, and you'll be rebuilding/retuning the carb, dumping the gas, maybe replacing gas lines or even the tank depending on corrosion/age of fuel, cleaning out oil passages, brake lines, brakes themselves, wiring may have gotten corroded, rust issues maybe, etc. etc. etc... This is why the 25k on my '01 was a welcome sight; she's a bike that's been ridden extensively by someone who loved the crap out of her and proved it by taking her out all the time. <3
- CK
#6
Neither bike has a lot of miles on it, so mileage isn't an issue as such. However the '05 has had a bit more use, which is good, also enough miles that it should be run in. If you've never owned a bike from new it may not be easy to appreciate that they don't ride the same way out of the showroom as they do say 10k miles later! It is only a small point, but as I said earlier, subject to checking both bikes over, that is the one I would choose. Of course if the '06 is a drop-dead gorgeous colour.......
#7
Neither bike has a lot of miles on it, so mileage isn't an issue as such. However the '05 has had a bit more use, which is good, also enough miles that it should be run in. If you've never owned a bike from new it may not be easy to appreciate that they don't ride the same way out of the showroom as they do say 10k miles later! It is only a small point, but as I said earlier, subject to checking both bikes over, that is the one I would choose. Of course if the '06 is a drop-dead gorgeous colour.......
Trending Topics
#8
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Somewhere on the Bourbon trail
Posts: 5,637
Received 1,634 Likes
on
1,166 Posts
#9
Also, what I am saying isn't that low-mileage older bikes are horrible (guess I could've written it better :P); just that I'd personally prefer a bit more mileage on an older bike buy...
Still, for the OP and anyone in the same situation: Simply put, get the one you want more. Even if you do have to clean the carb and do a bit of sprucing-up, you'll be happier with the bike in 6mo/1yr/10yrs/etc...
- CK