The "Low" trend, when will it end?
#12
#13
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: In the foothills of southwestern NC - US of A
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes
on
22 Posts
Most everything has a design purpose and the Sportster is a cruiser. Sure, anything can be made into something else, but that's what it ends up becoming..."something else." And I don't think the MoCo is offering these low bikes as a fashion statement but rather just another turn in the neverending rotation of styles, in an effort to keep from becoming stagnant. I mean after all, how much can things change but remain dedicated to the purpose and reason the Sportster exists? Do VW Beetles become 1/4 mile champions? Any 1985 Yugo's in the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series? See any M1 Abrams tanks on the F1 circuit?
I'm plenty happy with my Iron as it sits, and although I do engage in some "spirited" runs through the twisties from time to time scraping the factory pegs I know the bikes and my own limitations and would never for one moment think my bike's anything other than what it was designed to be...a cruiser. And if I did want to expand the envelope, well, then it's time for a sportbike.
Eh, just my opinion, worth whatcha' paid for it...
=8^)
#14
I think the point is that the Sportster has traditionally been an outlier in the Harley community because of being much taller and designed (as the name implies) to be Sporty. It's only in the past few years that factory lowered bikes have become the norm.
Here is some data from another forum:
2012 Harley Model Lean angle Specs:
Right/Left
883 Superlow - 24.7 / 24.4
Softail Slim - 24 / 24.9
Heritage Softail Classic - 24.4 / 25.9
Softail Blackline - 24.4 / 25.9
Fatboy Low - 25.6 / 25.2
Softail Deluxe - 25.8 / 26.7
Fatboy - 26.2 / 27
48 XLX 1200 - 27.8 / 26.1
XLC 1200 - 26.2 / 28.3
72 XLV 1200 - 28.6 / 29.8
Dyna Switchback - 29 / 29
883 Iron - 29 / 30
1200N - 29 / 30
Wide Glide - 28.4 / 31.9
Dyna Custom - 29.5 / 30.9
Street Bob - 30 / 31
Dyna Fat Bob - 30 / 31
Street Glide - 32 / 29
Road Glide Custom - 32 / 29
Various Vrods - 32 / 32
Road Glide Ultra - 33 / 31
Road King - 33 / 31
RK Classic - 33 / 31
Various Utrla's - 33 / 31
XR1200X - 39 / 40
1996 Harley Lean Angle Specs
FXST, FXSTS, FXSTB, FLSTF, FLSTC, FLSTN - 28 / 29
FLHT, FLHR, FLHTC, FLHTCU etc - 31 / 30
FXD, FXDL, FXDWG - 31 / 32
XLH 883 Hugger - 30.5 / 34
XL1200C - 30.5 / 34.0
FXDC - 33.5 / 34.5
XLH 883 / XLH 1200 / XL1200S - 40 / 36
Here is some data from another forum:
2012 Harley Model Lean angle Specs:
Right/Left
883 Superlow - 24.7 / 24.4
Softail Slim - 24 / 24.9
Heritage Softail Classic - 24.4 / 25.9
Softail Blackline - 24.4 / 25.9
Fatboy Low - 25.6 / 25.2
Softail Deluxe - 25.8 / 26.7
Fatboy - 26.2 / 27
48 XLX 1200 - 27.8 / 26.1
XLC 1200 - 26.2 / 28.3
72 XLV 1200 - 28.6 / 29.8
Dyna Switchback - 29 / 29
883 Iron - 29 / 30
1200N - 29 / 30
Wide Glide - 28.4 / 31.9
Dyna Custom - 29.5 / 30.9
Street Bob - 30 / 31
Dyna Fat Bob - 30 / 31
Street Glide - 32 / 29
Road Glide Custom - 32 / 29
Various Vrods - 32 / 32
Road Glide Ultra - 33 / 31
Road King - 33 / 31
RK Classic - 33 / 31
Various Utrla's - 33 / 31
XR1200X - 39 / 40
1996 Harley Lean Angle Specs
FXST, FXSTS, FXSTB, FLSTF, FLSTC, FLSTN - 28 / 29
FLHT, FLHR, FLHTC, FLHTCU etc - 31 / 30
FXD, FXDL, FXDWG - 31 / 32
XLH 883 Hugger - 30.5 / 34
XL1200C - 30.5 / 34.0
FXDC - 33.5 / 34.5
XLH 883 / XLH 1200 / XL1200S - 40 / 36
#15
#18
I wonder myself. Seems to me that if the OP is so concerned with cornering, he should be piloting a Buell XB12S instead of a Sporty?
Most everything has a design purpose and the Sportster is a cruiser. Sure, anything can be made into something else, but that's what it ends up becoming..."something else." .....
....... And if I did want to expand the envelope, well, then it's time for a sportbike.
Eh, just my opinion, worth whatcha' paid for it...
=8^)
Most everything has a design purpose and the Sportster is a cruiser. Sure, anything can be made into something else, but that's what it ends up becoming..."something else." .....
....... And if I did want to expand the envelope, well, then it's time for a sportbike.
Eh, just my opinion, worth whatcha' paid for it...
=8^)
Also, the original "design purpose" of the Sportster was not a boulevard cruiser. it was as a sporty standard; exactly what I'm pining for.
I've had a few sportbikes, btw, and they were TOO capable. I found myself going WAY faster than was prudent on public roads (as in, I've touched down footpeg feelers on the Hayabusa I owned) and the bikes kept begging for more. It's time to slow down a little.
#19
I've had 3 Buells; fantastic bikes and I wish I hadn't gotten rid of my XB12R. It's a cryin' shame you can't get a new one.
Also, the original "design purpose" of the Sportster was not a boulevard cruiser. it was as a sporty standard; exactly what I'm pining for.
I've had a few sportbikes, btw, and they were TOO capable. I found myself going WAY faster than was prudent on public roads (as in, I've touched down footpeg feelers on the Hayabusa I owned) and the bikes kept begging for more. It's time to slow down a little.
Also, the original "design purpose" of the Sportster was not a boulevard cruiser. it was as a sporty standard; exactly what I'm pining for.
I've had a few sportbikes, btw, and they were TOO capable. I found myself going WAY faster than was prudent on public roads (as in, I've touched down footpeg feelers on the Hayabusa I owned) and the bikes kept begging for more. It's time to slow down a little.
#20