Sportster Models 883, 883 Custom, 1200 Custom, 883L, 1200L, 1200S, 1200 Roadster, XR1200, and the Nightster.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2003 vs newer models

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-10-2007, 03:12 PM
3power's Avatar
3power
3power is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default 2003 vs newer models

Hi All-

I'm deep into my sportster lust and will be buying one soon. I really love the look of the Anniversary model 1200 custom and the going prices are very reasonable. I've read all about the vibration issue. Is it really that bad? Also, what other (if any) issues have folks had with the '03 models. Should I just go with one of the newer models? Thanks guys.
 
  #2  
Old 02-10-2007, 03:20 PM
XL OCD's Avatar
XL OCD
XL OCD is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 2003 vs newer models

No, it's not that bad. They're really not that different. I've owned both, they're all great bikes. The biggest difference that I notice is at highway speedsthe 04+ is more comefortable.
 
  #3  
Old 02-10-2007, 03:47 PM
brauny1's Avatar
brauny1
brauny1 is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2003 vs newer models

I've owned a 2000 1200C for years and vibration has never been an issue for me. I've never ridden a post 03 and think I'll keep it that way. A friends 99 vibrates morebut he's modified it to the max with Buell heads, 1250cc, cam, carb, etc., but is still tolerable. As far as other concerns with 03, there about 50lbs lighter due to beefed up frame on the 04,etc.. If your like the bike,hasn't beenabused,serviced, and price is right you shouldbe happy.
 
  #4  
Old 02-10-2007, 04:20 PM
1200c's Avatar
1200c
1200c is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: 2003 vs newer models

That answer to that is it depends. Some of those bikes were paint shakers while the others were very well balanced and mostly vibration free. It also depends on how much vibration someone can tolerate. Some people will complain about small amount of vibration while others don't notice it.

If I were to get an solidmount, then I would look for a sportster sport. Those came with some great brakes (4-piston caliper dual disk up front), great suspension (adjustable front and back), the lean angle on them was unreal (37/37), and they had a hopped up engine from the factory that was comparable in power to the rubbermounts. Actually, the rubbermounts inherited the sportster sport cams. To top it off the bikes were 50-60 lbs lighter.
 
  #5  
Old 02-10-2007, 04:30 PM
Hagar the Horrible's Avatar
Hagar the Horrible
Hagar the Horrible is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: toontown
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default RE: 2003 vs newer models

I have a 2003 and honestly have no vibration problem. I can see stuuf in the mirrors at idle and at 60 the same. My local dealership mechanics love the pre 04's better.
I am in the market for a Ultra or Road King and may even sell my Sporty if the right deal came along, but I would rather keep it if I can financially swing both.
 
  #6  
Old 02-10-2007, 05:59 PM
CWebb3's Avatar
CWebb3
CWebb3 is offline
Advanced
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2003 vs newer models

I didn't care for the vibration on the rubber mounted 1200's, but I'd been riding a GL1500 Gold Wing for 14 years so I was used to ultra smooth. Because of this (and money issues) I bought the XL883 which is smoother than the 1200's. On the other hand, I've previously owned an ironhead Sportster that I liked very much so the Wing probably spoiled me. I would say get what you can afford that turns you on. If I had my choice with money being no consideration, I'd have an '07 FI model. I like the concept of turning the key and going, without having to fuss around with the enrichener and warm-ups. I agree that the '03 Anniversary was a great looking Sportster.
 
  #7  
Old 02-10-2007, 06:56 PM
IronLegend's Avatar
IronLegend
IronLegend is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2003 vs newer models

Mine's a 2003 XLH883, my first Harley, and really the vibration is not bad, no worse than the '99 V-Star 650 I had previous to this. For me it's a keeper just have to finish accessorising it.
 
  #8  
Old 02-10-2007, 10:41 PM
3power's Avatar
3power
3power is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: 2003 vs newer models

Thanks for the responses guys. Ahh decisions, decisions!
 
  #9  
Old 02-10-2007, 10:48 PM
Flatlander's Avatar
Flatlander
Flatlander is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East Central Illinois
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2003 vs newer models

I have a rubber mount now but have ridden solid mounts before. And I have to tell you I don't notice any more vibration in the solid than I do my rubber mount. And hell, the mirrors are useless on either of them, position and vibration. But the jump of the motor at idle is the aura of the sportster and I wouldn't have it any other way.
 
  #10  
Old 02-10-2007, 10:49 PM
3power's Avatar
3power
3power is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: 2003 vs newer models

Hey one other question - are there any aftermarket pipes that aren't the crossover style?
 


Quick Reply: 2003 vs newer models



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.