Sportster Models 883, 883 Custom, 1200 Custom, 883L, 1200L, 1200S, 1200 Roadster, XR1200, and the Nightster.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1989 vs 2004 + Sportster Info Needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-04-2012, 10:20 AM
unclecurt's Avatar
unclecurt
unclecurt is offline
Advanced
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1989 vs 2004 + Sportster Info Needed

Considering adding another bike. It's a 1989 1200 Sportster which was originally an 883. The engine work was professionally done and the bike has very low miles. No other mods except for some cosmetic stuff. It looks very clean. Riding is solo, 160 lb rider, mostly two lanes at 50 - 60 mph with occasional highway runs of 500 miles or so at 75 mph.

My questions are :

1. What kind of issues to look for on an '89 model year (other than the 883 to 1200 engine upgrade)? Electrical? Suspension? Braking? Other?

2. Is the XL1200C produced in 2004 - 2006 that much better and if so in what way (other than the rubber mounted engine)?

3. What are the engine differences between an upgraded evo from 1989 and the 2004 motor?

I'm interested in the XL1200C for what seems to be a very reliable engine and well thought out design, so trying to decide between an older Sportster or one in the 2004 - 2006 range when they still had carbs.

Maybe the FI models are ok too, but a carb always seems simpler and less possibility to sudden failure than FI but I don't really know if this is an issue on the Sportsters or not.

Thanks.
 
  #2  
Old 12-04-2012, 11:58 AM
Big_Al47's Avatar
Big_Al47
Big_Al47 is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Veteran: Army
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 5,561
Received 93 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Not an expert, but I believe the 2004 and up models have rubber mounted engines, so the ride is smoother. Harley FI systems are really good
 
  #3  
Old 12-05-2012, 05:05 AM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
grbrown is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 45,429
Received 2,867 Likes on 2,429 Posts
Default

I never could get on with the solid mount Sporties, but love my rubber mount. Far more pleasant to ride. An 04 would be my choice over the 89.
 
  #4  
Old 12-05-2012, 06:35 AM
mrfikser's Avatar
mrfikser
mrfikser is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maryland near DC
Posts: 2,488
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

also the 89 has a chain final drive and if I remember right drum brakes in the rear and no sealed wheel bearings so you need to adjust and grease them...I would go with the newer bike unless you really love the look of the older one....
 
  #5  
Old 12-05-2012, 10:46 AM
unclecurt's Avatar
unclecurt
unclecurt is offline
Advanced
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've done some more homework and based on all the changes made in 2004 to the XL1200C chassis and engine, I think it's the way I'll go. Probably start looking for a 2004 - 2006, or maybe a year or two newer with fuel injection if the price works out close to the same.

Thanks.
 
  #6  
Old 12-05-2012, 11:21 AM
88XLH_DLX's Avatar
88XLH_DLX
88XLH_DLX is offline
Intermediate
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Delaware
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My 2 cents...

I have an '88 XL Deluxe with a 1200 kit with around 55k total miles. Exact same bike as the '89 you're looking at. Haven't had any major issues in the 3 years that I've owned it. Right now i'm looking at a valve job, front brake caliper rebuild, battery and paint job. Seems to be general maintenance for a 24 year old bike. It is a 4 speed tranny, but the gear ratio for my 4th gear is the same as 5th gear on a newer bike. I don't miss the extra shift at all. I can't speak for anybody else's bike, but mine has front and rear disc brakes...matches up with the service manual, so i'm not sure that any sporties in this generation had drum brakes.

Maybe its just me, but really like the styling of the older bikes. If given the choice, the only sportie I'd trade for is a new '72. Still had the old style, but new technology. I'm sure the rubber mounted engines reduce the vibration signifigantly, but I dont mind it the way it is...if i wanted a smoother ride i'd buy a big twin, or a caddy.
 
  #7  
Old 12-05-2012, 11:33 AM
Imold's Avatar
Imold
Imold is offline
Seasoned HDF Member

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Frozelandia, Minnysota
Posts: 27,076
Received 4,632 Likes on 2,735 Posts
Default

I'm with you on an '04 or later, though I like carbs, too. Have a '00 883 and a '04 1200C; wouldn't even think of going someplace on the 883 anymore where I'd be cruising over 60; over 65, I call it the paint mixer. Ain't the wheels, either, pull the clutch, back to idle, it's real smooth at 65+; just won't stay there... When (if) I ever finish all the stuff I want to do on the 1200, might think about selling the 883, but it's nice to have when the other one is on the jack.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
omgtkk
Sportster Models
3
08-07-2008 09:40 PM
wojeepster
Sportster Models
26
02-06-2008 12:00 PM
squale
Sportster Models
18
09-13-2007 08:48 AM
niskyne
Sportster Models
15
04-28-2007 09:49 PM
TomZwheels
Sportster Models
10
03-29-2006 03:33 PM



Quick Reply: 1989 vs 2004 + Sportster Info Needed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.