Here's my 4 month old
#12
Reducing pic resolution speeds up page load time, and most viewers are tired of people that upload images that are 3 times larger than what can be viewed on even the highest resolution monitors, without having to scroll the page left/right & up/down.
Simply clicking on the bar at the top of the pic allows it to be viewed at the higher resolution.
Edit:
A 3 megapixel camera, which is wimpy by today's standards, has 2,048 (horizontal) x 1,536 (vertical) pixels. That's a picture larger than can be displayed on a Hi-Def widescreen monitor running at 1920x1080.
With 5MP cameras common in cellphones today and people using them to take and upload unedited pictures to the forum, the forum would be dog slow and a visual mess, if they weren't re-sized.
Last edited by cHarley; 01-24-2012 at 09:53 AM.
#14
You must love Rogue (evidenced by the 6k miles) a sh*t ton to spend $18k+ ($8k for bike; $2k for tax, title, license, fees; $2k for warranty; $6k in aftermarket/accessories; shipping and labor not included) on a sportster! x 900,000
I hope you have a low interest rate
I hope you have a low interest rate
Last edited by GWinkleman; 01-24-2012 at 11:04 AM.
#15
Do it, you wont regret it. My buddy just picked up the same bike as mine and he'll be working on it slowly, I told him he had to get the 1200 upgrade! LOL
I'll try and get some more photos up soon, been busy and yesterday was my first day off in a while so I snapped a few shots. But like most photography, you only get 1 good photo for every 100 shots, lol.
You must love Rogue (evidenced by the 6k miles) a sh*t ton to spend $18k+ ($8k for bike; $2k for tax, title, license, fees; $2k for warranty; $6k in aftermarket/accessories; shipping and labor not included) on a sportster! x 900,000
I hope you have a low interest rate
I hope you have a low interest rate
I definitely love her, being my first motorcycle and all. Definitely been busy! I dont even know how much I spent on aftermarket parts yet. I only financed the bike with the 1200cc upgrade, everything else has been after that. LOL.
I am actually looking at NRHS 88 cubic inch conversion (not the 1250) LOL, too much money though.
Photobucket didn't re-size your image, but thankfully HDForums did.
Reducing pic resolution speeds up page load time, and most viewers are tired of people that upload images that are 3 times larger than what can be viewed on even the highest resolution monitors, without having to scroll the page left/right & up/down.
Simply clicking on the bar at the top of the pic allows it to be viewed at the higher resolution.
Edit:
A 3 megapixel camera, which is wimpy by today's standards, has 2,048 (horizontal) x 1,536 (vertical) pixels. That's a picture larger than can be displayed on a Hi-Def widescreen monitor running at 1920x1080.
With 5MP cameras common in cellphones today and people using them to take and upload unedited pictures to the forum, the forum would be dog slow and a visual mess, if they weren't re-sized.
Reducing pic resolution speeds up page load time, and most viewers are tired of people that upload images that are 3 times larger than what can be viewed on even the highest resolution monitors, without having to scroll the page left/right & up/down.
Simply clicking on the bar at the top of the pic allows it to be viewed at the higher resolution.
Edit:
A 3 megapixel camera, which is wimpy by today's standards, has 2,048 (horizontal) x 1,536 (vertical) pixels. That's a picture larger than can be displayed on a Hi-Def widescreen monitor running at 1920x1080.
With 5MP cameras common in cellphones today and people using them to take and upload unedited pictures to the forum, the forum would be dog slow and a visual mess, if they weren't re-sized.
#16
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Red Banks, Mississippi
Posts: 17,804
Received 4,240 Likes
on
2,470 Posts
Great looking ride!
When you post up more pics, maybe a video too..would like to hear it.
When you post up more pics, maybe a video too..would like to hear it.
#20