Removing my Baffles forced me to make changes!
#21
RE: Removing my Baffles forced me to make changes!
Not true downzero, I have a race tuner that was tuned for the V&H open baffles but when I put the closed/quite ones in I noticed a big torque difference, in fact I picked up a gear. Where I was running in 4th at 60mph it now runs quite well in 5th with no chugging.
#22
RE: Removing my Baffles forced me to make changes!
ORIGINAL: downzero
Sounds like your fuel mixture was too lean to begin with.
I'd be willing to bet the vast majority of people who gain power from installing baffles had previous fuel metering issues that became "bandaided" by installing them.
ORIGINAL: 6o66er
I highly suggest putting SOMETHING in your pipes as far as baffles...
I just recently put the Big City Thunder baffles in my drags...WAY more power and much better sound. I never realized just how much I was losing til I installed those damn things...they're AWESOME!!!
I highly suggest putting SOMETHING in your pipes as far as baffles...
I just recently put the Big City Thunder baffles in my drags...WAY more power and much better sound. I never realized just how much I was losing til I installed those damn things...they're AWESOME!!!
I'd be willing to bet the vast majority of people who gain power from installing baffles had previous fuel metering issues that became "bandaided" by installing them.
Most people with Sportsters only run 1 3/4" drags, 2" open pipes with a 1 7/8" ID are hard to tune on a stage 1 1200, without a doubt. You honestly can't find a jet kit that makes up for FULL 2" open drags on a stage one used for street riding that corrects power loss the way installing baffles and re-tuning can. It's not possible for the rpm range you're normally dealing with.
And for the record...I always run a TINY bit rich, to get a bit of after-burn to scare the kiddies and old people walking down the road.
#23
RE: Removing my Baffles forced me to make changes!
Ohhh I gotcha 666er. All I know is that Rush slip ons fit my 08 nightster and I want louder pipes without a considerable loss is power. If I can run 2.5 inch baffles that give me a good sound that wakes up the niehgboors but I can still destroy that Suzuki intruder, I'm good to go, haha!
#25
RE: Removing my Baffles forced me to make changes!
ORIGINAL: Golfgurl
I am soooo confused.. I think I will pull all my red hair out!
What if I put pictures.. will that help???
I am soooo confused.. I think I will pull all my red hair out!
What if I put pictures.. will that help???
#26
RE: Removing my Baffles forced me to make changes!
ORIGINAL: Whiskey_williams
thanx man!I'm leaningtowards the Rush slip ons, but the baffle size I want is 2.5 inch.
thanx man!I'm leaningtowards the Rush slip ons, but the baffle size I want is 2.5 inch.
#27
RE: Removing my Baffles forced me to make changes!
Okay, on my SportyI ran 2" drags, no baffles, a Super E with a Thunderjet and a SE race ignition. The bike screamed and I never had any torque issues despite my 215lb weight.
Yes, open drags will produce a dip in the torque curve, yes larger diameter pipes will enhance the dip. Riding style does play a role in how a bike is tuned and what components should be used.
For GG, I would suggest working at increasing low to mid torque. Open pipes aren't the best choice for you. You are not going to be revving the bike to 6k rpms or power shifting. Torque is the friend of the short shifter.
If you like loud then you have to compromise on low end torque. But whatI consider "low end" in rpms is probably different than what a lot of people consider "low end".
A broad flat torque curve works best for the majority of riders. That means that you need back pressure. I can live with a torque curve that is a little low on the left side so long as the hp's are up on the right side of the dyno sheet, but most people will disagree with me.
Yes, open drags will produce a dip in the torque curve, yes larger diameter pipes will enhance the dip. Riding style does play a role in how a bike is tuned and what components should be used.
For GG, I would suggest working at increasing low to mid torque. Open pipes aren't the best choice for you. You are not going to be revving the bike to 6k rpms or power shifting. Torque is the friend of the short shifter.
If you like loud then you have to compromise on low end torque. But whatI consider "low end" in rpms is probably different than what a lot of people consider "low end".
A broad flat torque curve works best for the majority of riders. That means that you need back pressure. I can live with a torque curve that is a little low on the left side so long as the hp's are up on the right side of the dyno sheet, but most people will disagree with me.
#28
RE: Removing my Baffles forced me to make changes!
Changing out the air cleaner and jets will help flow a bit, but without having the baffles in there, you will lose backpressure in the exhaust, and lose power. So even though you're going to fix up the intake, it won't fix your exhaust problem....you'll still see/feel a loss in tq.
As 6o66er said, there are many versions of baffles, i've never heard them in person, but the big city thunder baffles are supposed to be really nice...maybe do a search for some sound clips.
Marc
As 6o66er said, there are many versions of baffles, i've never heard them in person, but the big city thunder baffles are supposed to be really nice...maybe do a search for some sound clips.
Marc
#29
RE: Removing my Baffles forced me to make changes!
ORIGINAL: Golfgurl
I am soooo confused.. I think I will pull all my red hair out!
What if I put pictures.. will that help???
I am soooo confused.. I think I will pull all my red hair out!
What if I put pictures.. will that help???
A few simple rules on exhausts, torque and riding styles.
1. A pipe with no restriction (ie. baffles) will make good high rpm horsepower but with a sacrifice of lower end torque (ie. chuggability).
2. An exhaust with good backpressure (ie. baffles) will make better lower end torque at the sacrifice of high rpm horsepower.
3. Less aggressive riders benefit from a bike with good low end torque because they rarely get intothe higher rpm range and tend to shift earlier than a more aggressive rider.
I know that you like how the bike sounds with the baffles out but you will either have tolive with the torque loss or go back to running the baffles.
Installing a less restrictive intake (ie.SE setup) will help a little but you aren't going to eliminate the low end loss with it.
#30
RE: Removing my Baffles forced me to make changes!
1.-2. No, youre gonna lose your MIDRANGE torque without baffles not your low range. Youre gonna lose torque where you feel it most, right in the sporties power band, 3-4.5k. Yeah yer right about the high end but the high end is 5k-6k and we aint drag racing most of the time ehh? As to 3. Nope, by the time the open baffles would assist you with power youre already out of power band and you should have shifted gears. Open baffles are basicly no help on the street period.
well... unless you are WFO over 100 mph.
And... if you cant feel a drop in mid range torque with open pipes yer butt dynos broke.
well... unless you are WFO over 100 mph.
And... if you cant feel a drop in mid range torque with open pipes yer butt dynos broke.
ORIGINAL: The Baron
1. A pipe with no restriction (ie. baffles) will make good high rpm horsepower but with a sacrifice of lower end torque (ie. chuggability).
2. An exhaust with good backpressure (ie. baffles) will make better lower end torque at the sacrifice of high rpm horsepower.
3. Less aggressive riders benefit from a bike with good low end torque because they rarely get intothe higher rpm range and tend to shift earlier than a more aggressive rider.
I know that you like how the bike sounds with the baffles out but you will either have tolive with the torque loss or go back to running the baffles.
Installing a less restrictive intake (ie.SE setup) will help a little but you aren't going to eliminate the low end loss with it.
1. A pipe with no restriction (ie. baffles) will make good high rpm horsepower but with a sacrifice of lower end torque (ie. chuggability).
2. An exhaust with good backpressure (ie. baffles) will make better lower end torque at the sacrifice of high rpm horsepower.
3. Less aggressive riders benefit from a bike with good low end torque because they rarely get intothe higher rpm range and tend to shift earlier than a more aggressive rider.
I know that you like how the bike sounds with the baffles out but you will either have tolive with the torque loss or go back to running the baffles.
Installing a less restrictive intake (ie.SE setup) will help a little but you aren't going to eliminate the low end loss with it.