Which Sportster for the S.O.?
#11
RE: Which Sportster for the S.O.?
Go with the 1200, if you go with the Sporty, as someone said it is all in the wrist, and she will be able to control her slow speed and the extra power is good to have. My wife has 1200, no problems. Good bike to get started on, wife is already looking at a Low Rider and a Heritage caught her eye, so I know the HD blood is in her veins for sure now.LOL
#12
#13
RE: Which Sportster for the S.O.?
ORIGINAL: whaap
That's fine. My thinking is that a person of normal, average intelligence would know that you don't want to "grab a handfull of throttle" in any type situation.
It's not that there isn't a risk involved. There is in any endeavour you undertake.
When I retired from the real world I got a job selling metrics for awhile. The typical story is a person buys a 250 - 350 or even a 500 cc because they are "beginners" and you'll see them back in the dealership within a month because they've outgrown their beginner bike and now want a real bike. That awkward, clumsy beginner stage is relatively short lived and unless they've got money to throw away they might as well buy the bike they want because, if they don't,in a month they'll be wishing they had.
Is there risk involved? Yes. But, if they're aware of the risk, again I think the average person can handle it for that brief period of time.
That's fine. My thinking is that a person of normal, average intelligence would know that you don't want to "grab a handfull of throttle" in any type situation.
It's not that there isn't a risk involved. There is in any endeavour you undertake.
When I retired from the real world I got a job selling metrics for awhile. The typical story is a person buys a 250 - 350 or even a 500 cc because they are "beginners" and you'll see them back in the dealership within a month because they've outgrown their beginner bike and now want a real bike. That awkward, clumsy beginner stage is relatively short lived and unless they've got money to throw away they might as well buy the bike they want because, if they don't,in a month they'll be wishing they had.
Is there risk involved? Yes. But, if they're aware of the risk, again I think the average person can handle it for that brief period of time.
i'm sure albert einstein would fall off a skateboard for awhile before he got the hang of it.
by the way,
i sure hope you didn't sell manyhayabusas or z1000s to beginners when youwere a metric salesman...
although doing that has job security...it sure has driven up insurance rates and boosted the parts and repair side.
#14
RE: Which Sportster for the S.O.?
Lots of opinions out here....I have an 883 and I weigh 300 pounds and I have no problems keeping up with the crowds.....Yes the 1200 has more chrome and prob better re-sale value. I cant comment on the other models because the sportster is all Ive ever rode. Just consider an 883....less money upfront and its not a bad bike at all......just my 2 cents
well pleased 883 owner
wayne
well pleased 883 owner
wayne
#15
RE: Which Sportster for the S.O.?
ORIGINAL: ultraultra
I would really suggest a Deluxe over a Sporty. They are a much easier bike to ride because of the balance. This opinion may pi$$ off the Sporty riders, and that is not my intent. The sporty just rides higher, and to me, just feel top heavy. The wife had one years ago (before we met), because everyone TOLD her that was the bike she needed toupgrade to from a Honda Rebel. Well, that experience ended badly. She was afraid of anything else, because she had one bad experience, and the "big twin was just too much power to handle". Then, she had an eye for a Low Rider. I tried to get her on a Road King, but the extra weight scared her. I had her try a Heritage.. again she was scared. Then, (to my delight), a salesman suggested she try a Deluxe. She sat on it, and her face immediately lit up! She now has an '07 Deluxe.. had it for just over a year now, and couldn't be happier with ANY other bike.
I would really suggest a Deluxe over a Sporty. They are a much easier bike to ride because of the balance. This opinion may pi$$ off the Sporty riders, and that is not my intent. The sporty just rides higher, and to me, just feel top heavy. The wife had one years ago (before we met), because everyone TOLD her that was the bike she needed toupgrade to from a Honda Rebel. Well, that experience ended badly. She was afraid of anything else, because she had one bad experience, and the "big twin was just too much power to handle". Then, she had an eye for a Low Rider. I tried to get her on a Road King, but the extra weight scared her. I had her try a Heritage.. again she was scared. Then, (to my delight), a salesman suggested she try a Deluxe. She sat on it, and her face immediately lit up! She now has an '07 Deluxe.. had it for just over a year now, and couldn't be happier with ANY other bike.
#16
RE: Which Sportster for the S.O.?
ORIGINAL: celticgent
the problem with this logic is that a beginner doesn't have the instincts to control the bike.
you need practice to be able to make the right decision in a split second.
this is MUCH harder to do on a more powerful and heavier bike.
example:
let's say she hits a pothole and it surprises her so she grabs a handful of throttle to hold onto the bike...
a 250cc ain't gonna pop a wheelie or buck her off, but my 1200R WILL do that if you redline it.
if i had started on my sporty instead of my (doggish) 750 shadow ace i would've been in trouble quite a few times.
a less powerful and lighter bike is more forgiving of mistakes, which is what a beginner needs.
let's say yourwife had never driven a car and just got her driver's permit...do you run out and buy her a Viper...i mean, it's the right foot that makes the car fast...she can control it and won't make any mistakes, right?
why exactly does every beginner course start on 300-400 lb bikes with low horsepower? it ain't just cause it's cheap...it's because beginners make mistakes and mistakes can be deadly on a bike.
just my .02$
ORIGINAL: whaap
My response to people that suggest that perhaps a 1200 is "too much power" is that it's all in the right wrist. In other words, I can ride my 1200 as slow and as dogedly as someone else can ride a 250. It's all up to the operator.
My response to people that suggest that perhaps a 1200 is "too much power" is that it's all in the right wrist. In other words, I can ride my 1200 as slow and as dogedly as someone else can ride a 250. It's all up to the operator.
you need practice to be able to make the right decision in a split second.
this is MUCH harder to do on a more powerful and heavier bike.
example:
let's say she hits a pothole and it surprises her so she grabs a handful of throttle to hold onto the bike...
a 250cc ain't gonna pop a wheelie or buck her off, but my 1200R WILL do that if you redline it.
if i had started on my sporty instead of my (doggish) 750 shadow ace i would've been in trouble quite a few times.
a less powerful and lighter bike is more forgiving of mistakes, which is what a beginner needs.
let's say yourwife had never driven a car and just got her driver's permit...do you run out and buy her a Viper...i mean, it's the right foot that makes the car fast...she can control it and won't make any mistakes, right?
why exactly does every beginner course start on 300-400 lb bikes with low horsepower? it ain't just cause it's cheap...it's because beginners make mistakes and mistakes can be deadly on a bike.
just my .02$
My suggestion would be to get a smaller bike first. For example, we bought a 2002 Rebel 250 for $1700. She rode it for a year. I could have sold it for $1700, but traded it in to the Harley dealer and still got $1300. They hold their value very well. It was worth every penny of that $400 to get her a year of experience under her belt.
BTW, on the C50, she dropped it 5 times in less than 20 miles.This was after taking the MSF course.In the year she rode the Rebel, about 1000 miles, she never dropped it.
If this was her 2nd bike, I would say go alittle bigger. But with this being a first bike, it's best to start small.
#17
RE: Which Sportster for the S.O.?
ORIGINAL: scottburns8ball
I would agree. I bought my wife a Suzuki Boulevard C50 for her first bike. It "only" has an 805cc engine, and is dragging anchor compared to her Sporty 883. Problem is, the C50 was unrideable for her. The bike is bigger than a FatBoy in length and width and wheel base. It is about 150-200lbs lighter due to the extensive use of plastic. I know other women who ride the **** out of this bike, but for her 5'2" 120lbs soaking wet frame, it was intimidating to her. An unconfident rider is as bad or worse than an over confident rider. Plus, bikes of that size are not forgiving. One mistake and she may go down. When I got my wife a Honda Rebel 250, she felt confident on the smaller bike, felt in control and was able to hone her skills.A bike of that size will let you understeer, oversteer or whatever and still let you correct yourself in time.
My suggestion would be to get a smaller bike first. For example, we bought a 2002 Rebel 250 for $1700. She rode it for a year. I could have sold it for $1700, but traded it in to the Harley dealer and still got $1300. They hold their value very well. It was worth every penny of that $400 to get her a year of experience under her belt.
BTW, on the C50, she dropped it 5 times in less than 20 miles.This was after taking the MSF course.In the year she rode the Rebel, about 1000 miles, she never dropped it.
If this was her 2nd bike, I would say go alittle bigger. But with this being a first bike, it's best to start small.
I would agree. I bought my wife a Suzuki Boulevard C50 for her first bike. It "only" has an 805cc engine, and is dragging anchor compared to her Sporty 883. Problem is, the C50 was unrideable for her. The bike is bigger than a FatBoy in length and width and wheel base. It is about 150-200lbs lighter due to the extensive use of plastic. I know other women who ride the **** out of this bike, but for her 5'2" 120lbs soaking wet frame, it was intimidating to her. An unconfident rider is as bad or worse than an over confident rider. Plus, bikes of that size are not forgiving. One mistake and she may go down. When I got my wife a Honda Rebel 250, she felt confident on the smaller bike, felt in control and was able to hone her skills.A bike of that size will let you understeer, oversteer or whatever and still let you correct yourself in time.
My suggestion would be to get a smaller bike first. For example, we bought a 2002 Rebel 250 for $1700. She rode it for a year. I could have sold it for $1700, but traded it in to the Harley dealer and still got $1300. They hold their value very well. It was worth every penny of that $400 to get her a year of experience under her belt.
BTW, on the C50, she dropped it 5 times in less than 20 miles.This was after taking the MSF course.In the year she rode the Rebel, about 1000 miles, she never dropped it.
If this was her 2nd bike, I would say go alittle bigger. But with this being a first bike, it's best to start small.
i almost dropped it a couple times, due to my error, but luckily i was big and strong enough to catch it with one hand.a small woman ain't gonna be able to do that.
besides the fact that dropping a $4000 used honda wouldn't have been as tragic as a new Harley..in my opinion.
#18
RE: Which Sportster for the S.O.?
The original poster did not ask "what kind and size of bike should I buy for my wife. He asked for opinions between the 883 and the 1200. My remarks were based on the OP question concerning whether to go with the 883 or the 1200. A person can more than likely get into as much trouble with the 883 as they can the 1200. Come on, there isn't that much difference in the two bikes.
Now, if his wife is not capable of handling either bike, that is a totally different story. As far as whether to buy an 883 or a 1200, I stated my opinion (a belief).
Now, if his wife is not capable of handling either bike, that is a totally different story. As far as whether to buy an 883 or a 1200, I stated my opinion (a belief).
#20
RE: Which Sportster for the S.O.?
ORIGINAL: whaap
The original poster did not ask "what kind and size of bike should I buy for my wife. He asked for opinions between the 883 and the 1200. My remarks were based on the OP question concerning whether to go with the 883 or the 1200. A person can more than likely get into as much trouble with the 883 as they can the 1200. Come on, there isn't that much difference in the two bikes.
Now, if his wife is not capable of handling either bike, that is a totally different story. As far as whether to buy an 883 or a 1200, I stated my opinion (a belief).
The original poster did not ask "what kind and size of bike should I buy for my wife. He asked for opinions between the 883 and the 1200. My remarks were based on the OP question concerning whether to go with the 883 or the 1200. A person can more than likely get into as much trouble with the 883 as they can the 1200. Come on, there isn't that much difference in the two bikes.
Now, if his wife is not capable of handling either bike, that is a totally different story. As far as whether to buy an 883 or a 1200, I stated my opinion (a belief).
"And the other side is to start with a Dyna or Softtail but I'm really thinking the bigger 1584cc is TOO big for a 'beginner'."
So I think it's okay to respond to that part of the post as well