1200 XLH Infrared Thermography
#12
#13
You are correct John Harper
Physics theory: Heat (electromagnetic energy) radiation rate, per unit of surface area, is proportional to the fourth power of the surface temperature. Heat radiation rate, per unit of surface area, is directly proportional to the emissivity characteristic of the surface. Emissivity = 1.0 (approx.) for a dull black surface; emissivity = 0.3 (approx.) Hence the rate at which heat is radiated from an engine block with a dull black surface might be roughly estimated as 3x the rate at which heat is radiated from an engine block with a shiny metal surface.
http://answers.google.com/answers/th...id/711843.html
Physics theory: Heat (electromagnetic energy) radiation rate, per unit of surface area, is proportional to the fourth power of the surface temperature. Heat radiation rate, per unit of surface area, is directly proportional to the emissivity characteristic of the surface. Emissivity = 1.0 (approx.) for a dull black surface; emissivity = 0.3 (approx.) Hence the rate at which heat is radiated from an engine block with a dull black surface might be roughly estimated as 3x the rate at which heat is radiated from an engine block with a shiny metal surface.
http://answers.google.com/answers/th...id/711843.html
#15
You are correct John Harper
Physics theory: Heat (electromagnetic energy) radiation rate, per unit of surface area, is proportional to the fourth power of the surface temperature. Heat radiation rate, per unit of surface area, is directly proportional to the emissivity characteristic of the surface. Emissivity = 1.0 (approx.) for a dull black surface; emissivity = 0.3 (approx.) Hence the rate at which heat is radiated from an engine block with a dull black surface might be roughly estimated as 3x the rate at which heat is radiated from an engine block with a shiny metal surface.
http://answers.google.com/answers/th...id/711843.html
Physics theory: Heat (electromagnetic energy) radiation rate, per unit of surface area, is proportional to the fourth power of the surface temperature. Heat radiation rate, per unit of surface area, is directly proportional to the emissivity characteristic of the surface. Emissivity = 1.0 (approx.) for a dull black surface; emissivity = 0.3 (approx.) Hence the rate at which heat is radiated from an engine block with a dull black surface might be roughly estimated as 3x the rate at which heat is radiated from an engine block with a shiny metal surface.
http://answers.google.com/answers/th...id/711843.html
That is why I lightly paint my Jeeps tranny coolers flat black and not leave then shinny aluminum.
Thanks for the info,
Jim
#16
You are correct John Harper
Physics theory: Heat (electromagnetic energy) radiation rate, per unit of surface area, is proportional to the fourth power of the surface temperature. Heat radiation rate, per unit of surface area, is directly proportional to the emissivity characteristic of the surface. Emissivity = 1.0 (approx.) for a dull black surface; emissivity = 0.3 (approx.) Hence the rate at which heat is radiated from an engine block with a dull black surface might be roughly estimated as 3x the rate at which heat is radiated from an engine block with a shiny metal surface.
http://answers.google.com/answers/th...id/711843.html
Physics theory: Heat (electromagnetic energy) radiation rate, per unit of surface area, is proportional to the fourth power of the surface temperature. Heat radiation rate, per unit of surface area, is directly proportional to the emissivity characteristic of the surface. Emissivity = 1.0 (approx.) for a dull black surface; emissivity = 0.3 (approx.) Hence the rate at which heat is radiated from an engine block with a dull black surface might be roughly estimated as 3x the rate at which heat is radiated from an engine block with a shiny metal surface.
http://answers.google.com/answers/th...id/711843.html
#18
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Red Banks, Mississippi
Posts: 17,769
Received 4,221 Likes
on
2,456 Posts
Great pics and information! Thank you for posting them up.
Do you have any thoughts on why the front cylinder is hotter than the rear...since it is more in the wind, it seems like the rear cylinder would be hotter than the front.
Do you have any thoughts on why the front cylinder is hotter than the rear...since it is more in the wind, it seems like the rear cylinder would be hotter than the front.
__________________
Win Up to $350.00 Cash from DK Custom This Month, Click HERE to see How!
DKCustomProducts.com
Win Up to $350.00 Cash from DK Custom This Month, Click HERE to see How!
DKCustomProducts.com
#19
After reading your post I loaded the images back into my software and did a comparison of temperatures of the two cylinders. I found the highest tempeature in the front cylinder to be 351.8 degrees and the rear 332.9 degrees. A difference of 18.9 degrees. I also reviewed the visible light image and noticed the outer bolts on both cylinders are a different color than the inner bolts on each side of the spark plugs. This finding leads me to believe that at least on my 1200 the outer edges of the cylinders run hotter than the inner areas. It would be interesting to know if this is normal on Harley engines.
#20
To answer my own question about head bolt discoloration on outer edge bolts, I have found several photos on google that display the same thing. Keeping in mind that my bike is nearly 15 years old the photos I found are from the same era. I will have too start asking other Harley owners if I can take Infrared images of their bikes to see if the temperature difference is common on all engines. Any takers in the Madison Wisconsin area?