Se 204
#3
#4
IMO se204 is one of the best came for stock 96 inch motor,I know people suggest woods Andrew ETC but I dont see how those cams are WAY better than se 204,the 204 have decent duration and lift ,pick hp near red line and also have plenty of TQ down lo RPM's,the 204 will go head to head with any other aftermarket cam if not outperform,and they sound great to.
#5
I would like to hear the reasoning as well. As others will tell you on here, the 204 isn't necessarily the best cam option out there. The price is a little more forgiving then some others, but don't over look the Andrews or Woods grinds. I am not bashing the 204s as others have used them and dig them, but just wondering if you looked into anything else. Just because it says HD on it, doesn't mean its the best out there.
#6
#7
bro your bike is lighter than his to,I beat you that your bike is not making much more HP than his.
Trending Topics
#8
here is a dyno compressing 255 vs 555 I know 555 is making more power BUT
look at the specs
the 255 duration is near as the stock cam
vs 555 much more aggressive cam
if they compare the 204 vs 555 results will be so close.
now for the specs
stock cams
duration 216-220 lift 473 473
(se255) 211-235 550-550
(555 ) 242-242 555-555
(204 ) 236-240 508-508
look at the specs
the 255 duration is near as the stock cam
vs 555 much more aggressive cam
if they compare the 204 vs 555 results will be so close.
now for the specs
stock cams
duration 216-220 lift 473 473
(se255) 211-235 550-550
(555 ) 242-242 555-555
(204 ) 236-240 508-508
#9
http://jackpotmufflers.com/images/se255vstw555.jpg
look at the dyno 555 vs 255 on the lower rpm not much difference until 4500......
if this was done VS 204 weal you guess.....
look at the dyno 555 vs 255 on the lower rpm not much difference until 4500......
if this was done VS 204 weal you guess.....
Last edited by Sash302; 12-26-2011 at 03:04 PM.