Softail handling
#21
I have a 2011 fatboy. Didnt care too much for the feel of the stock bikes riding position. Added a set of 13" chubby bars and a badlander seat, and it changed the whole bike. It is as comfortable as any bike I have rode. Rear suspension is no hell, but I will cure that with some 422 progressive shocks.
#23
#24
#25
I appreciate everyone's response to my initial question. I had a dealer here in VA tell me that there was a reason that HD stopped making the NT and that I should move on to the Wide Glide, that is was a better riding bike. But there is just something about the NT and the hardtail look that hasn't let me move to the WG. Once the I get home again, the local dealer has a NT ready for me to test ride.
Thanks again for the insight.
Thanks again for the insight.
I get a kick out of Harley "handling" threads. At the end of the day they're all still Harleys. Want something that "handles?" buy an R1!
#26
#27
In my opinion, the Dyna has certain handling similarities to the Sportster but it's still a much different ride. To me, touring bikes are big and heavy lumbering beasts initially but are very comfortable once you get used to them.
Personally I like how the Softail handles... it's a happy medium in between the hot rod ride of the Sportster and Dyna; and the big comfy couch that is a touring bike.
Personally I like how the Softail handles... it's a happy medium in between the hot rod ride of the Sportster and Dyna; and the big comfy couch that is a touring bike.
I cruise a lot at 75 to 85 and I don't notice any vibration at all. I don't know if I could handle the way a Dyna or bagger vibrates at idle.
#28
You're comparing apples to oranges...
There are few similarities in their handling characteristics. Think about the differences between riding a Sporty and a Softail. Both are related by heritage but not much more similarity exists.
In my opinion, the Dyna has certain handling similarities to the Sportster but it's still a much different ride. To me, touring bikes are big and heavy lumbering beasts initially but are very comfortable once you get used to them.
Personally I like how the Softail handles... it's a happy medium in between the hot rod ride of the Sportster and Dyna; and the big comfy couch that is a touring bike.
There are few similarities in their handling characteristics. Think about the differences between riding a Sporty and a Softail. Both are related by heritage but not much more similarity exists.
In my opinion, the Dyna has certain handling similarities to the Sportster but it's still a much different ride. To me, touring bikes are big and heavy lumbering beasts initially but are very comfortable once you get used to them.
Personally I like how the Softail handles... it's a happy medium in between the hot rod ride of the Sportster and Dyna; and the big comfy couch that is a touring bike.
Just traded my 2010 Ultra Limited for a 2012 Heritage Softtail. Had a few big bikes over the years and my last Ultra will be my last big bagger. Yeah, great from long tours but I don't do that anymore and really wanted something sportier and more fun.
Softtail does that and much more. Handling at any speed is very nice, it much lighter than the big baggers (250 lbs less than my Ultra Limited), gets 20 percent better mileage, and rides great on unimproved roads (dirt and gravel).
#29