caliper bleed screw !! #%&@!!!!!
#11
What a great question! I figured I'd look into it and what I discovered is perplexing. Yes, the current 44048-83A is the non-o'ring type. H-D has recently obsoleted it and went BACK to 44048-83!!
I ordered 5 of the 44048-83 just to see what they look like but you're right, the parts book calls for a bleeder that IS NOT correct!!
Sadly, they screwed up the fork leg bolt on 2010 Dynas too. Sold a customer the bolt that was called for and it's wrong.
There must be quite a process in getting engineering specs to the parts book publishers because they can't seem to get it right.
I'll follow up when the other bleeders arrive.
I ordered 5 of the 44048-83 just to see what they look like but you're right, the parts book calls for a bleeder that IS NOT correct!!
Sadly, they screwed up the fork leg bolt on 2010 Dynas too. Sold a customer the bolt that was called for and it's wrong.
There must be quite a process in getting engineering specs to the parts book publishers because they can't seem to get it right.
I'll follow up when the other bleeders arrive.
#12
Thank you Kagan for clearing that up. Atleast I know that im not crazy..
What a great question! I figured I'd look into it and what I discovered is perplexing. Yes, the current 44048-83A is the non-o'ring type. H-D has recently obsoleted it and went BACK to 44048-83!!
I ordered 5 of the 44048-83 just to see what they look like but you're right, the parts book calls for a bleeder that IS NOT correct!!
Sadly, they screwed up the fork leg bolt on 2010 Dynas too. Sold a customer the bolt that was called for and it's wrong.
There must be quite a process in getting engineering specs to the parts book publishers because they can't seem to get it right.
I'll follow up when the other bleeders arrive.
I ordered 5 of the 44048-83 just to see what they look like but you're right, the parts book calls for a bleeder that IS NOT correct!!
Sadly, they screwed up the fork leg bolt on 2010 Dynas too. Sold a customer the bolt that was called for and it's wrong.
There must be quite a process in getting engineering specs to the parts book publishers because they can't seem to get it right.
I'll follow up when the other bleeders arrive.
#13
#16
#17
Well, the 44048-83 version showed up today. Same as the -83A in damned near every aspect. It might be something as silly as a change of vendor.
I still have no idea what the part number is for the new, current production o'ring type. I'll be placing a call to H-D tech Services tomorrow.
Stay tuned...
I still have no idea what the part number is for the new, current production o'ring type. I'll be placing a call to H-D tech Services tomorrow.
Stay tuned...
#19
I'm not sure if this will help you or not, but here's what the factory bleed screw looks like off my '09. I replaced them a couple weeks ago with Speed Bleeders.
Could the ones on your bike now have been replaced by someone before you?
I read in the service manual that the o-rings on the bleeders were there to help them bleed the brakes on the assembly line and that they could be discarded.
Could the ones on your bike now have been replaced by someone before you?
I read in the service manual that the o-rings on the bleeders were there to help them bleed the brakes on the assembly line and that they could be discarded.
#20
I'm not sure if this will help you or not, but here's what the factory bleed screw looks like off my '09. I replaced them a couple weeks ago with Speed Bleeders.
Could the ones on your bike now have been replaced by someone before you?
I read in the service manual that the o-rings on the bleeders were there to help them bleed the brakes on the assembly line and that they could be discarded.
Could the ones on your bike now have been replaced by someone before you?
I read in the service manual that the o-rings on the bleeders were there to help them bleed the brakes on the assembly line and that they could be discarded.