SE what? Air cleaner, slipons? Cams? The 92 HP seems good, but the 113 ft/lb torque seems a bit over the top (or are we talking n/m torque). A bit more info on what the bike actually is would be good-a dyno sheet would be good too.
Cheers, Mike
SE what? Air cleaner, slipons? Cams? The 92 HP seems good, but the 113 ft/lb torque seems a bit over the top (or are we talking n/m torque). A bit more info on what the bike actually is would be good-a dyno sheet would be good too.
Cheers, Mike
It's the SE Softail Convertible with the 110 in it
It's the SE Softail Convertible with the 110 in it
Oops. My bad. In that case, I would have expected more power. I'm guessing the motor & ancilliaries are stock, so improvements are not far off.
Cheers, Mike
It seems quite on par for a stock 110 set-up. Remember Harley detunes the s*** out of their bikes. Don't kno wwhat kind of tune he's got on there but that seems just a little over stock
It seems quite on par for a stock 110 set-up. Remember Harley detunes the s*** out of their bikes. Don't kno wwhat kind of tune he's got on there but that seems just a little over stock
The stock CVO 110 doesn't put out 113/92,
I just checked Fuel Motos upgrades for them.
They dynoed the stock CVO 110 at 96.5TQ and 83.8 HP.
After adding their up grades they got 114TQ /95HP..
Had it on the dyno this morning. 95 in big bore, SE 204 cams, mild head work, RSD air cleaner, and V&H short shots with BCT baffles. I think it may be time to move to a decent 2-1 pipe. The HP is a little lower than I hoped for. 104 TQ and 84 HP.
The head work does help..
I've seen a bunch of 103's dyno's and they are right where U are now..
105/85...
Without seeing Ur dyno I can't really say too much, But most 2-1's will move the TQ to the left quite a bit and last longer in the low-mid range over the Short Shots that don't usually come on strong till after 3000-3500 rpms.... BUT overall they usually dont give U any better numbers.
Dont play the numbers game,, play put the power where U need it game.