Softail Models Standard, Custom, Night Train, Deuce, Springer, Heritage, Fatboy, Deluxe, Rocker and Cross Bones.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

counter-balanced verses rubber-mounted

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 09-02-2007 | 11:51 PM
angelina78's Avatar
angelina78
Cruiser
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: jersey
Default RE: counter-balanced verses rubber-mounted

i currently own both a softtail and a roadking. they are different bikes. the softtail is my wife's, not because it is a girls bike, but because i wanted both types in the garage. thought the road king would be the longhaul bike and the softail around town. the softail is fun to ride, responsive, quick and just a blast. the downside it rides as hard as my 78 fl. you know when you've hit a pothole. in handles high speed really well, in fact may even be better than the king at 75-95. very stable. downside ride comfort, cant spend 2 hours on it.

i happened to like the vibration on the king. its a bigger bike both in size and feel. handles twisties better than the softail because of the higher floorboard height. vibration disappears once off idle. at higher speeds the front feels lighter but once you learn to trust your ride you realize it's also very stable.

the bottom line is how much riding, or better, how much saddle time do you expect. if you ride everyday like i do, the king is king.

oh as far as tightening loose nuts and bolts, get used to it on any vtwin. i owned two yamaha vstars and they loosened more hardware than any harley i've owned. one time the rear fender fell off of one of the vstars.
 
  #12  
Old 09-03-2007 | 12:22 AM
Midwest Muscle's Avatar
Midwest Muscle
Cruiser
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 1
From:
Default RE: counter-balanced verses rubber-mounted

My last two HD's were an '01 Dyna Wide Glide and this '03 Softail Springer that I still have. After having the 88B engine in the FXSTS, I would be hard pressed to have another non-balanced engine. I thought I liked the vibrations, until I found out how much sweeter it feels without them ...

Mike
 
  #13  
Old 09-03-2007 | 04:33 AM
rhj529's Avatar
rhj529
Advanced
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 88
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Default RE: counter-balanced verses rubber-mounted

Buy the bike that is the style you are looking for. If you are happy with this you prob won't pay attention to the motor.
 
The following users liked this post:
welly-h (08-17-2021)
  #14  
Old 09-03-2007 | 05:21 AM
Spike_96's Avatar
Spike_96
Cruiser
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: counter-balanced verses rubber-mounted

ORIGINAL: PoorBoy

A Harley is a Harley, is a Harley. If you want silky-smooth, go buy a four-piston import. I'll take the rumble and the vibrations any day.

[sm=icon_cheers.gif]
Amen my Brother, Amen.
 
  #15  
Old 09-03-2007 | 06:34 AM
deadeye's Avatar
deadeye
Road Warrior
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 92
From:
Default RE: counter-balanced verses rubber-mounted

I wanted a Street Bob until I test rode one. I have to spend too much time in traffic to deal with the vibes. If I was doing mostly hiway miles I wouldn't care.
 
  #16  
Old 09-03-2007 | 08:07 AM
Heritage07's Avatar
Heritage07
Road Warrior
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 88
From: NJ
Default RE: counter-balanced verses rubber-mounted

Pre 2000 I would have taken the rubber mount any day. I remember I test drove a 1993 Softail Custom at the York open house. I didn't think I would make it back as it felt like it was going to fall apart any minute. You couldn't even read the speedometer it was so bad.
 
  #17  
Old 09-03-2007 | 09:15 AM
mplecha's Avatar
mplecha
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 167
From: Lakeland, FL
Default RE: counter-balanced verses rubber-mounted

My fatboy is a MUCH smoother ride than the rubber mounted nightster I had before. I know the sporty and the dyna are totally different, but I much prefer the balanced engine. I just got back from a nice trip this weekend. I rode to Maggie Valley, NC from Columbia, SC on just the backroads. 35-60mph the whole way for about 6 hours each way, and other than getting rained on in the mountains, I can't imagine a better ride (even with a stock seat!).
 
  #18  
Old 09-03-2007 | 10:40 PM
Cigar Aggie's Avatar
Cigar Aggie
Road Master
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
From: Weatherford, Texas
Default RE: counter-balanced verses rubber-mounted

I have an 88B on my '05 Springer Classic....Rented a '07 Road King in June and rode it 400 miles...I couldn't wait to get backon my bike. The rubber mounted engine was annoying as hell at stops....
 
  #19  
Old 09-16-2010 | 10:35 AM
NorCal Dog's Avatar
NorCal Dog
Road Master
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 766
Likes: 1
From: 415/707
Default

i've got an '06 fatty with the 88/95B motor, that idles as smooth as glass, but definitely vibrates at 75mph+ which TOTALLY SUX

thinking about running the setup that Chad Pickens is running with a forged balanced A crank with no balancers, as i could give a *** if it's smooth when it idles,,, i want it smooth when i'm out runnin hard
 
  #20  
Old 09-16-2010 | 04:09 PM
mike06train's Avatar
mike06train
Road Captain
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 717
Likes: 1
From: Drexel Hill, Pa
Default

I don't know about the B motors vibrations at 75+. I just rode down the shore at 75 to 85 for 100+ miles and the vibrations were no worse then any other bike I've rode. It was better then a 4 cyclinder GSXR 750 and that was prett smooth on the highway. I rode my buddies street glide and that wasn't bad at idle either so maybe it's me. Bikes are gonna vibrate alittle. If you want smooth buy a hybrid.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 PM.