Is chain drive an “upgrade”?
#1
#2
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southeast Michigan 15 Minutes East Of Hell
Posts: 149,163
Received 49,852 Likes
on
19,334 Posts
The following users liked this post:
hvacgaspiping (12-25-2021)
#3
Chains are better for hi torque applications. I recall other threads where bikes in excess of 150 ft-lbs were fine with a good condition belt. For those that want to play around with drive ratios a chain can still provide grip on smaller sprockets than a belt.
But, chains needs more frequent adjustment, lubrication & cleaning, and are noisier.
But, chains needs more frequent adjustment, lubrication & cleaning, and are noisier.
#4
Belt drive is the greatest invention since hydraulic forks. Harley belts last 70,000 miles. They have low weight. A shaft drive has a lot of unsprung weight. Shaft drive has more parts to wear and fail. Chains are great for racing. Who wants to oil a chain every 300 miles? Sometimes you can go 600 miles before oiling a drive chain but even then how can you do any touring or even a long day trip with that kind of maintenance requirements. If you swap out your belt drive for a chain it will never last as long as a belt. A chain stretches much faster than a belt. Looking over the maintenance intervals you can see a belt can go 100 times further before needing maintenance. 100 times further before you need to replace the belt. 100 times further before you need to adjust the belt tension. You've probably gone through several tires by that time. So with a belt you literally NEVER need to adjust the belt except for the times you replace the tire. Reinstalling a rear wheel entails adjusting the belt.
In my eyes it's a no brainer. Who in there right minds would want a chain over a belt? The only advantages of a chain are in modified engines with high horse power and riders that don't put many miles on their cycle.
In my eyes it's a no brainer. Who in there right minds would want a chain over a belt? The only advantages of a chain are in modified engines with high horse power and riders that don't put many miles on their cycle.
Last edited by Durango Dave; 12-30-2018 at 09:33 PM.
The following 4 users liked this post by Durango Dave:
#5
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southeast Michigan 15 Minutes East Of Hell
Posts: 149,163
Received 49,852 Likes
on
19,334 Posts
Belt drive is the best invention since hydraulic forks. Harley belts last 70,000 miles. They have low weight. A shaft drive has a lot of unsprung weight. Shaft drive has more parts to wear and fail. Chains are great for racing. Who wants to oil a chain every 300 miles? Sometimes you can go 600 miles before oiling a drive chain but even then how can you do any touring or even a long day trip with that kind of maintenance requirements. If you swap out your belt drive for a chain it will never last as long as a belt. A chain stretches much faster than a belt. Looking over the maintenance intervals you can see a belt can go 100 times further before needing maintenance. 100 times further before you need to replace the belt. 100 times further before you need to adjust the belt tension. You've probably gone through several tires by that time. So with a belt you literally NEVER need to adjust the belt except for the times you replace the tire. Reinstalling a rear wheel entails adjusting the belt.
In my eyes it's a no brainer. Who in there right minds would want a chain over a belt? The only advantages of a chain are in modified engines with high horse power and riders that don't put many miles on their cycle.
In my eyes it's a no brainer. Who in there right minds would want a chain over a belt? The only advantages of a chain are in modified engines with high horse power and riders that don't put many miles on their cycle.
Kind of answered your own question there, didn't ya?
The following 3 users liked this post by Uncle Larry:
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Sandy Eggo's North County
Posts: 14,891
Received 5,742 Likes
on
3,105 Posts
Nothing wrong with belts, as long as it's for a street application.
Haven't seen too many belts fail. 1 actually. That was with a huge engine with a 100hp wet shot on launch. Sheared the teeth.
Broke chains happen more often. Heck, I've broke chains, and thrown 'em.
Haven't seen too many belts fail. 1 actually. That was with a huge engine with a 100hp wet shot on launch. Sheared the teeth.
Broke chains happen more often. Heck, I've broke chains, and thrown 'em.
Last edited by NORTY FLATZ; 12-30-2018 at 09:40 PM.
The following users liked this post:
TwiZted Biker (12-31-2018)
#9
I converted my last bike to a chain and loved it. Sure you have to adjust a new chain after a few hundred miles but I didn't have to do it very often after that. I read where a chain is louder than a belt and I suppose that's true but I never heard mine due to the fact that my pipes were so loud. Now I think I will convert to a chain on my Deluxe.
The following users liked this post:
E10HD (12-25-2021)
#10
I converted my last bike to a chain and loved it. Sure you have to adjust a new chain after a few hundred miles but I didn't have to do it very often after that. I read where a chain is louder than a belt and I suppose that's true but I never heard mine due to the fact that my pipes were so loud. Now I think I will convert to a chain on my Deluxe.
I could go on got all kinda dirty fun chain related stories I could tell you, rode & dicked with chains 30 odd years and went through some gyrations converting my old shovel over to belt. Best thing I ever did for her.
Last edited by TwiZted Biker; 12-31-2018 at 11:29 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by TwiZted Biker:
hvacgaspiping (12-25-2021),
Ron750 (12-24-2021)