Softail Models Standard, Custom, Night Train, Deuce, Springer, Heritage, Fatboy, Deluxe, Rocker and Cross Bones.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1994 Fatboy - Biggest rear tire on stock rim?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-05-2017, 06:23 PM
Windseeker's Avatar
Windseeker
Windseeker is offline
Elite HDF Member
Veteran: Air Force
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Behind you, making faces
Posts: 4,647
Received 5,259 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Default 1994 Fatboy - Biggest rear tire on stock rim?

As the title says..... I'm currently running a (new) 140mm rear on my 1994 Fatboy. It's fine as it is, but I'm also interested in a fatter look.

Just so we're clear, I'm NOT interested at all in a wide tire conversion kit, replacing the swingarm, 300mm tire, or anything like that.

What's the fattest tire my stock rim can SAFELY take with no rubbing or other issues?
 
  #2  
Old 09-05-2017, 06:31 PM
rodhotter's Avatar
rodhotter
rodhotter is offline
Tourer
Join Date: May 2006
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

if you know your rim width go to avonmoto or others for correct tyre fitments + specs then measure how much room you have everywhere!!!
 
  #3  
Old 09-05-2017, 06:46 PM
Windseeker's Avatar
Windseeker
Windseeker is offline
Elite HDF Member
Veteran: Air Force
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Behind you, making faces
Posts: 4,647
Received 5,259 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rodhotter
if you know your rim width go to avonmoto or others for correct tyre fitments + specs then measure how much room you have everywhere!!!
Thanks. I'll check that out.
 
  #4  
Old 09-06-2017, 03:54 AM
Evoken's Avatar
Evoken
Evoken is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: New Galilee, Pa
Posts: 303
Received 78 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

I think a 140 may be about it. I have a 98 custom, same frame. Without converting to a thinner belt or chain the 140 mu is the biggest I could stuff in there without clearance issues. Maybe you could sneak a 150 mu, but I think it would rub the belt.
 
The following users liked this post:
Dogs57 (07-31-2022)
  #5  
Old 09-06-2017, 06:18 AM
Windseeker's Avatar
Windseeker
Windseeker is offline
Elite HDF Member
Veteran: Air Force
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Behind you, making faces
Posts: 4,647
Received 5,259 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Evoken
I think a 140 may be about it. I have a 98 custom, same frame. Without converting to a thinner belt or chain the 140 mu is the biggest I could stuff in there without clearance issues. Maybe you could sneak a 150 mu, but I think it would rub the belt.
Thanks. That's what I was looking for.

Not a big deal either way.

 
  #6  
Old 09-06-2017, 07:48 AM
=fugitive='s Avatar
=fugitive=
=fugitive= is offline
Advanced
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Oz
Posts: 65
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Evoken
I think a 140 may be about it. I have a 98 custom, same frame. Without converting to a thinner belt or chain the 140 mu is the biggest I could stuff in there without clearance issues. Maybe you could sneak a 150 mu, but I think it would rub the belt.
Yup, I'm also running a 140 (1996 Fatboy) in the Michelin Commander II. There's just enough clearance between it and my drive belt.
 
  #7  
Old 09-06-2017, 09:32 AM
langwilliams's Avatar
langwilliams
langwilliams is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Lorain Ohio
Posts: 3,830
Received 302 Likes on 274 Posts
Default

I think a 150 will be the max the stock wheel can hold...you would probably need a pulley spacer to gain belt clearance. I put a 170 under my 94 but I put a skinny belt on it an used a deuce wheel.
 
  #8  
Old 09-06-2017, 04:07 PM
Windseeker's Avatar
Windseeker
Windseeker is offline
Elite HDF Member
Veteran: Air Force
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Behind you, making faces
Posts: 4,647
Received 5,259 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by =fugitive=
Yup, I'm also running a 140 (1996 Fatboy) in the Michelin Commander II. There's just enough clearance between it and my drive belt.
That'd what I almost bought, a Commander II. But since I was replacing only the rear because it got punctured, I saved a few bucks by getting a Dunlop. I also did this because the front was a Dunlop, not that it really matters.

But when it's time to replace them both, it'll probably be the Commander II.
 
  #9  
Old 09-06-2017, 05:59 PM
=fugitive='s Avatar
=fugitive=
=fugitive= is offline
Advanced
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Oz
Posts: 65
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Windseeker
That'd what I almost bought, a Commander II. But since I was replacing only the rear because it got punctured, I saved a few bucks by getting a Dunlop. I also did this because the front was a Dunlop, not that it really matters.

But when it's time to replace them both, it'll probably be the Commander II.
A bit of a re-post of some info I posted into another thread but relevant here:

When I got my '96 Fatboy earlier this year I changed the tyres out to the Michelin Commander II's and have no complaints, great tyre. I went slightly wider on the rear 130 -> 140 because my Indy said the Michelin rep told him the 140 has a slightly different profile that handled better than the 130's. I don't know if that's true or not because I haven't seen them side by side, but I took his advice because I didn't have any prior experience with the MC II's and have been happy with the handling and look of them.
 
  #10  
Old 07-26-2022, 08:17 AM
Kenneth Wise's Avatar
Kenneth Wise
Kenneth Wise is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Carlisle, Pa
Posts: 143
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

I managed to stuff a Dunlop 404 150mm rear tire on my 1994 Fatboy and have .010" clearance between the edge of my tire and the drive belt.

No rubbing on anything...

 


Quick Reply: 1994 Fatboy - Biggest rear tire on stock rim?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.