yeah, its the same one, and yes the stick is the same length.

 

Guess I'll put my vote in for the analog HD gauge too.
I got it because like someone else said you don't have to fiddle around with buttons or dead batteries. Besides I ALWAYS check the level manually before I go anywhere so the level function isn't very useful for me.
I have been thinking ofswiping some red nail polish off the wife and putting a thin stripe on the bezel rim at about the 230 or 235 mark. That way I don't even have to bother trying to read those little numbers with my tri-focals while zipping down the road at 75mph. If you do that and put it in so the stripe is to the front it only takes a very quick glance to see if its under and fine, or over and I may have a problem.

 

My personal favorite is the analog style. The only thingI DON'T like is that it doesn't seem to fit as snug as it should. SinceI switched to to synthetic oil, the problem seems to have got even worse.

 

good tip citrioplus, I have bad eyes too, a mark on the dial...great call!

 

Thanks, at first I tried reading it all the time, but the numbers are small and its not in a really good place for quick and easy reading while riding. So I tried to do what they used to do in airliners with analog gauges where theyrotate them so all the needlesface the same way whenthey are operating properly.
Only having the one gauge on the tank I tried to orient it so at 200 degrees the needle faced straight ahead. Only problem with that is that if your not paying attention or get distracted after checking the oil you don't always put it in dead right. So the first time you 'think' its too hot or cold you get spooked into pulling over to check. Then you get annoyed because there isn't anything really wrong.

With the bike parked its easy to see like this.



But with eye's like mine it takes time to focus on something that's under my leg. So more often than not whenyoumove your leg out of the way to take a peek at it all you see is something like this.



With the paint mark on it doesn't matter if its in the exact right position or not.With the stripe on thereyou do not have to read the actual numbers just the needles relationship to the stripe.
Just a simple case ofusingthemilitary 'KISS' principal for my own ends.

BTW I tried the Red, but it was a little too dark to see easy at night. So I useda bottle of yellow that one of my son's ex goth gf's left behindafter she got replaced.I have been using it to waterproof things with. Yellow seemslike it will bea bit easier to see after dark.

 

I had the digital with the level indicator. The levelwas neveraccurate as it would say high, normal, orjusterrorand the Lcd faded out in less then 3 months. I have the analog temp only and it is very accurate and I think it looks better too.

 

I have the LCD one on my 07 Heritage for now it works great. well see.

 

I will have to concur with the analog folks; I think they look much better.

As far as the dipstick being too short, it is possible this person bought the wrong one. My dad has an 85 Softail Custom, his dipstick is about half the length of the one on my bike.

Citori, may I ask why you marked it at 235? I was under the impression these bikes could run without issue at higher temps than that. I base this on what I was told by my dealer; perhaps I should get my manual out.
[align=left] [/align]

 

OK, pulled out the manual and I now remember why I asked the dealer. The manual lists the phases of EFI engine heat management system, but says it is for the FLSTSCI only. This makes no sense to me, don't all Softails for a given model year have the same motor? Anyway, Phase 1 of this system initiates at 266 degrees, Phase 4 at 331 degrees.
[align=left] [/align]

 

Awesome, analog it is...

thanks fellas,

WARG