I bought a'12 Cvo RG why didn't you buy one
#61
#63
Face it, all Harleys are under performing in the motorcycle world.
We don't purchase Harleys for acceleration, if you did, you screwed the pooch.
Last edited by cptdenny; 03-02-2012 at 12:47 PM.
#64
hoofnhog, I wouldn't brag that you own HD stock, and then use that as if you are profiting from a CVO buyer. If you think making a tiny dividend is profit from your investment, then I can see why you don't own a CVO in the first place.
Trust me, the MoCo profits more from guys like me who buy a straight line model and invests heavily for that individual look. The CVO is a straight up great deal from the MoCo considering what you get. My next bike will be a RG CVO because the building and customizing process is 90% finished at a 50% discount, and I'm a guy who want's it all done right now... My NT came off the show room floor stock and was delivered to me as you see it, complete with motor work..
There are some CVOs that are show stoppers for me, and most other CVO models are not. The 2011 CVO RG definitely is, and I am not a bagger guy...
My wife hinted to me that she might want to start riding with me, so now I'm ready for a second bike.
Power? Power is money, plain and simple.. Want a Harley with power, be in a position to buy it without whining like a little girl about money. The whining doesn't look good my friend....
A guy who can spend 40K on a Harley can usually and painlessly spend a few more bucks if he wants to go faster.
Trust me, the MoCo profits more from guys like me who buy a straight line model and invests heavily for that individual look. The CVO is a straight up great deal from the MoCo considering what you get. My next bike will be a RG CVO because the building and customizing process is 90% finished at a 50% discount, and I'm a guy who want's it all done right now... My NT came off the show room floor stock and was delivered to me as you see it, complete with motor work..
There are some CVOs that are show stoppers for me, and most other CVO models are not. The 2011 CVO RG definitely is, and I am not a bagger guy...
My wife hinted to me that she might want to start riding with me, so now I'm ready for a second bike.
Power? Power is money, plain and simple.. Want a Harley with power, be in a position to buy it without whining like a little girl about money. The whining doesn't look good my friend....
A guy who can spend 40K on a Harley can usually and painlessly spend a few more bucks if he wants to go faster.
Last edited by George C; 03-02-2012 at 08:01 AM.
#65
Seems like the RG might be the least popular model. If you have a CVO and didn't buy a RG why not? And if you did what did you like about the bike? I personally like the looks of the bike and feel that it handles better than the bat wing faring as I have also owned a Street glide and an Ultra.
#66
#67
So what made you modify your under performing 88" to a under performing 95"? Did you get tired of being spanked by Suzuki Burgman 650cc automatic scooters owners?
Face it, all Harleys are under performing in the motorcycle world.
We don't purchase Harleys for acceleration, if you did, you screwed the pooch.
Face it, all Harleys are under performing in the motorcycle world.
We don't purchase Harleys for acceleration, if you did, you screwed the pooch.
My 95 incher produces more HP/TQ per cubic inch than any 110 inch CVO that Harley has ever placed on a showroom floor...... THAT'S what I meant by underperforming.... my 106 inch RoadKing has even better ratios..... that's all...it's that simple..... I'm not trying to dissuade you or anyone else from buying a CVO.... My opinion is that you can take that same money and "roll your own" from a stock bike and end up with a much better performing bike that is certainly more unique than the production bike CVO's, ( I own two of them now).... there is NOTHING "custom" about CVO's...... ???????????????????
#68
Boy, you just don't get it. I'll try one more time... now read for comprehension, K???
My 95 incher produces more HP/TQ per cubic inch than any 110 inch CVO that Harley has ever placed on a showroom floor...... THAT'S what I meant by underperforming.... my 106 inch RoadKing has even better ratios..... that's all...it's that simple..... I'm not trying to dissuade you or anyone else from buying a CVO.... My opinion is that you can take that same money and "roll your own" from a stock bike and end up with a much better performing bike that is certainly more unique than the production bike CVO's, ( I own two of them now).... there is NOTHING "custom" about CVO's...... ???????????????????
My 95 incher produces more HP/TQ per cubic inch than any 110 inch CVO that Harley has ever placed on a showroom floor...... THAT'S what I meant by underperforming.... my 106 inch RoadKing has even better ratios..... that's all...it's that simple..... I'm not trying to dissuade you or anyone else from buying a CVO.... My opinion is that you can take that same money and "roll your own" from a stock bike and end up with a much better performing bike that is certainly more unique than the production bike CVO's, ( I own two of them now).... there is NOTHING "custom" about CVO's...... ???????????????????
With your way of thinking you could have saved tens of thousands if you went out and purchased a Honda Helix scooter instead of that money trap of yours. After all the Helix will still get you from point A to point B just as quick as your over paid under performing modded out HD, within the posted speed limit.
You're like a Corvette owner trying to tell a Bently Turbo owner how he wasted his money on his Bently.
Enjoy your one-of-a-kind HD, while appreciating the fact that you're the only one that would pay so much for your ride.
Last edited by cptdenny; 03-02-2012 at 06:23 PM.
#69
So, yes, I spend a lot of money on my Harleys.... 'cause I want to, I can, and I don't borrow a penny to do it.... and your right, power costs $$$$....... but we all love 'em and I hope you ride the hell outta yours..... I could care less if you ride a Shadow as long as you are doing your own thing and it makes you smile........
#70
I don't think "you" get it.
The 110" must meet federal emissions to be sold as a new vehicle in the USA, remember?
Consider the restrictions on the 110" in order to make emissions. At least, I hope you can. Sure, it's easy to say that you and I have a great advantage over a stock 110" from the work we have done to our engines, but the fact remains that the CVO is a 110" CID engine to begin with, not an 88", and even less engine work will produce results that will destroy our 95" engine.
I look for the CVO to have the 120" in the frame this August. Tune up that guy and you will have a nice running bike.
BTW, I don't do much in stocks. My wife and I do have a 401K that I can place money in at tax time to keep my accountant happy and to keep some deffered tax money to uh-hum..build. A few pieces of nice stocks to keep my friend who is a broker happy, but my investments are within my own business. I don't do volatility, especially under someone else's control. I like to bet on "me"..
The 110" must meet federal emissions to be sold as a new vehicle in the USA, remember?
Consider the restrictions on the 110" in order to make emissions. At least, I hope you can. Sure, it's easy to say that you and I have a great advantage over a stock 110" from the work we have done to our engines, but the fact remains that the CVO is a 110" CID engine to begin with, not an 88", and even less engine work will produce results that will destroy our 95" engine.
I look for the CVO to have the 120" in the frame this August. Tune up that guy and you will have a nice running bike.
BTW, I don't do much in stocks. My wife and I do have a 401K that I can place money in at tax time to keep my accountant happy and to keep some deffered tax money to uh-hum..build. A few pieces of nice stocks to keep my friend who is a broker happy, but my investments are within my own business. I don't do volatility, especially under someone else's control. I like to bet on "me"..
Last edited by George C; 03-02-2012 at 06:31 PM.