Mint Panhead, 1965, Fresh Restoration
#1
The following 12 users liked this post by drjmba:
70copperz (06-07-2020),
DanDeleted (06-11-2020),
DanHappy (06-07-2020),
hvacgaspiping (06-07-2020),
JayStronghawk (06-08-2020),
and 7 others liked this post.
#2
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Klaus County, Cali
Posts: 7,331
Received 3,349 Likes
on
1,520 Posts
The following 2 users liked this post by panz4ever:
ccislander (06-09-2020),
smitty901 (06-10-2020)
#3
#4
#6
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Klaus County, Cali
Posts: 7,331
Received 3,349 Likes
on
1,520 Posts
The following users liked this post:
IzzoQuazzo (06-05-2020)
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 8,105
Received 5,453 Likes
on
2,780 Posts
The following users liked this post:
Tom84FXST (06-05-2020)
#9
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Klaus County, Cali
Posts: 7,331
Received 3,349 Likes
on
1,520 Posts
For the right price that bike would be a heck of a rider and defintiely get some looks.
Last edited by panz4ever; 06-05-2020 at 01:44 PM.
#10
maybe at a Harley ride in show its a 100 points
too much bling I will name a few thing that were not chrome - regulator cover - fuel lift for the pet **** is broken off - and gas caps are 1973 up not early - as said the numbers are too big and wrong type numbers for speedo - fork sliders are not chrome > stainless - spokes are not chrome cad plated - rear directional bracket not chrome polished only - and the tail light should be the same color as the bike even tho the red is not correct for 1965 - plate holder is a re pop do not see the -55 numbers - front directionals are incorrect as in a later re pop design - mirror is round in 1965 - I could go on some others will see what I see and post as well - seat is wrong ---- guessing it was a homeowner resto and not a shop I would say its a 50 to 60 percent judging in a real arena
too much bling I will name a few thing that were not chrome - regulator cover - fuel lift for the pet **** is broken off - and gas caps are 1973 up not early - as said the numbers are too big and wrong type numbers for speedo - fork sliders are not chrome > stainless - spokes are not chrome cad plated - rear directional bracket not chrome polished only - and the tail light should be the same color as the bike even tho the red is not correct for 1965 - plate holder is a re pop do not see the -55 numbers - front directionals are incorrect as in a later re pop design - mirror is round in 1965 - I could go on some others will see what I see and post as well - seat is wrong ---- guessing it was a homeowner resto and not a shop I would say its a 50 to 60 percent judging in a real arena
The following 3 users liked this post by johnjzjz: