Read your Formost-AARP polices!!
#31
11-30-2010, 07:33 PM
Originally Posted by cowboy Harry
Well, who ever reads all the way thru, word for word, on one of these insurance papers???????
I'm betting or would least hope that most here have read their warranties. No different.
AARP car insurance is from The Hartford.
I'm not preaching, just saying if you are going to pay that much money, you best understand what your coverage is.
#32
11-30-2010, 07:34 PM
The point is, yes I do think it's possible.
There is no requirement to carry collision insurance, he owns it free and clear, no violation of any laws
A motorcycle is not a motor vehicle within the meaning of the No-Fault Law. Since motorcycles are exempt from the definition of motor vehicle, a motorcyclist is not a covered person under the No- Fault Law and is not entitled to these medical and lost wage benefits.
Medical cost are not covered without a separate rider
ATV and boats commonly have area of use clauses
In some states a separate rider is required for a passenger to be covered for medical expenses when the rider of the bike is at fault.
Motorcycles are not cars and are handled differently by insurance companies.
So yep, I think it's possible
There is no requirement to carry collision insurance, he owns it free and clear, no violation of any laws
A motorcycle is not a motor vehicle within the meaning of the No-Fault Law. Since motorcycles are exempt from the definition of motor vehicle, a motorcyclist is not a covered person under the No- Fault Law and is not entitled to these medical and lost wage benefits.
Medical cost are not covered without a separate rider
ATV and boats commonly have area of use clauses
In some states a separate rider is required for a passenger to be covered for medical expenses when the rider of the bike is at fault.
Motorcycles are not cars and are handled differently by insurance companies.
So yep, I think it's possible
Last edited by barjbar; 11-30-2010 at 07:45 PM.
