Milwaukee Eight (M8) 2017 and up M8 Air and Liquid Cooled discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Touring Power Cam???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-27-2018, 08:26 AM
103Eagle's Avatar
103Eagle
103Eagle is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 793
Received 111 Likes on 79 Posts
Default Touring Power Cam???

Curious if anyone has tried the HD Power Cam instead of the torque cam.....

And yes I have seen the MOCO dyno run comparision and understand different riding styles...........

Just like to hear from someone that actually put one of these in a BAGGER and if they can tell us about their results.......

Thanks
Eagle Out

 
  #2  
Old 02-27-2018, 09:01 AM
Deputyrj's Avatar
Deputyrj
Deputyrj is offline
Advanced
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 84
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I will be the first to admit I’m not an engine guy but have an amazing service manager near me. I told him I needed more power and I decided on the power cams because I’m mostly highway riding in traffic. He did what was essentially a stage 1 with screaming eagle heavy air flow power cams, TTS tuner. The turner allows you to save Harley settings, dyno, then reset with warranty issues.

The main power range is from 3000 rpms through 6000. At first it took awhile to get used to because I was used to babying it at 4000 but a good tech should set your rev limiter higher. After about 30 mph the change in torque is huge. Your acceleration snaps instead of gradually increasing. On a side not 6th gear now becomes overdrive only your max power is in 5th. Can’t remember dyno gains but I know factory stopped at 116 mph and I hit the needle at 120 pretty easy.

Not knowing engines very well I again deferred to the manager and he put me at a stage 3 +. The reason for the plus is he sent heads out to Vance and Hines to drill the heads? And now I’m at 116 torque and 108 hp. The difference he showed me is with Vance and Hines work max torque holds for almost 3000 rpm range and there’s is 1500. Here is latest dyno from stage 1 to now to give you idea.


 
  #3  
Old 02-27-2018, 05:57 PM
davewear's Avatar
davewear
davewear is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,730
Received 197 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

“On a side not 6th gear now becomes overdrive only your max power is in 5th.”

Ooh I’d love to have 6th gear be an overdrive! And it’s only a cam change away???
 

Last edited by davewear; 02-27-2018 at 05:59 PM.
  #4  
Old 02-27-2018, 06:01 PM
badcooky's Avatar
badcooky
badcooky is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Location location.
Posts: 3,097
Received 473 Likes on 370 Posts
Default

That graph looks bogus to me.
 
  #5  
Old 02-27-2018, 06:18 PM
goose222's Avatar
goose222
goose222 is offline
Road Master
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Idaho
Posts: 962
Received 140 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

I’m with you. It said that max torque was 103.46 but now where on that graph does it ever max out at 103.46. Maybe I’m missing something but it looks like someone sold somebody a bill of goods.
 
  #6  
Old 02-27-2018, 06:19 PM
FatBob2018's Avatar
FatBob2018
FatBob2018 is offline
Grand HDF Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,797
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,353 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by badcooky
That graph looks bogus to me.
Looks a little odd to me too. The Horsepower and Torque lines always cross over at 5250 rpms, it's part of the forumula, it cannot be any other way. But that chart shows them crossing at 4750 and 4900 RPMs. That's ... weird.
 
  #7  
Old 02-27-2018, 07:42 PM
Steve Cole's Avatar
Steve Cole
Steve Cole is offline
HD EFI Guru
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,000
Received 3,688 Likes on 1,670 Posts
Default

On a dynojet dyno report it is possible to make the two scales different on one graph. This will cause the crossover points to appear to move. Without seeing both sides of the graph I cannot tell what is going on, so I will not guess at it. Since he said the heads were removed and sent out, I would assume this is a Stage III upgrade kit but it's hard to tell due to the statements being made. Someone is confused, misunderstood or has been lied too.
 
  #8  
Old 02-27-2018, 08:59 PM
Deputyrj's Avatar
Deputyrj
Deputyrj is offline
Advanced
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 84
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

If anyone wants to challenge the authenticity of the dyno feel free. The bottom numbers are the stage 1 when I had power cams done with intake and Mastertune. The second set of higher numbers are a Stage III plus the head work by Vance and Hines. I trust the Service Manager completely who worked for Harley for 13 years and 5 for Vance and helping design cams. The reason he sends the heads out is because as you can see (or disbelieve) the goal is to maintain 100 lbs torque as long as possible. Mine lasts from 3000 rpm through 5250. If you look at a stage III by itself it’s approximately 1500 rpm range. I took the photo off the dyno screen so it is grainy but don’t need to alter a document just to offer my opinion on the cams alone.
 
  #9  
Old 02-27-2018, 09:37 PM
badcooky's Avatar
badcooky
badcooky is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Location location.
Posts: 3,097
Received 473 Likes on 370 Posts
Default

Man we're not saying it's you or them at all being bogus , well I'm not it's just that I've never seen any HP/TQ crossover at anything other than 5250 revs .
 
  #10  
Old 02-28-2018, 12:00 AM
SoCalHDMC's Avatar
SoCalHDMC
SoCalHDMC is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: So Cal!
Posts: 514
Received 160 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 103Eagle
Curious if anyone has tried the HD Power Cam instead of the torque cam.....

And yes I have seen the MOCO dyno run comparision and understand different riding styles...........

Just like to hear from someone that actually put one of these in a BAGGER and if they can tell us about their results.......

Thanks
Eagle Out

After riding several ‘17 107’s with 447 torque cams, along with the prerequisite pipes/air filter/tuner, and being largely unimpressed (I know, everyone rides differently), I opted for the 462 Power cam. As I have stated in previous threads, I found the rev limiter very early on in my ownership, and definitely did not like the tractor-like personality of the stock cam and tuning.

Shortly after the 1000 mile service, I installed the SE Street Cannons, Ventilator, Power cam and Pro Street tuner.

Pulls strong off the bottom (I can drag it down to 2000 RPM and roll into the throttle deep, no downshifting, with no balking out of engine), and pulls hard from 3000 to the top (6150 or so).

Fun to ride now, I routinely run it to redline in 2nd and 3rd when out for a run, 5500 in 4th, then back to normalcy in 5th and 6th. Just rode another torque cam equipped M8 Sunday. I don’t believe my riding style fits with the power band of that particular camshaft.

Maybe when I am older, but who knows, I will be 55 on the next one, and I still love to ride at the upper portion of the tach. swing. BTW, 4687 miles on the clock when I parked it Sunday.

 

Last edited by SoCalHDMC; 02-28-2018 at 12:01 AM.
The following 4 users liked this post by SoCalHDMC:
Gwnixon (05-18-2020), MI-Rider (02-28-2018), mjwebb (02-28-2018), Wmoor004 (02-28-2018)


Quick Reply: Touring Power Cam???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 PM.