People say Harley’s are priced too high
#191
. "Of which HD hasn't a clue. 115 years of stagnation."
Yet since 2000 Honda, Yamaha, Kawasaki and Suzuki large touring machine sales has dropped a full 50% while H-D touring sales has been stable.
Add in the BMW, Triumph and other big touring machines like Victories and Indian Harley still has 50% of the touring market covered year after year.
Now just explain in simple words to this not very bright old man how that SUCCESS translates into clueless and stagnation.
Also why did Honda issue a press release a few years back that they would no longer design and build a bike for the US market but only the Asian market? That was after the Rune, VTX and Fury models were such a dismal failure in this country and cost Honda financial losses for years on their US market. Recently I saw a major Chicago area dear list multiple years of NOS bikes from Rebels up at huge discounts.
Yet since 2000 Honda, Yamaha, Kawasaki and Suzuki large touring machine sales has dropped a full 50% while H-D touring sales has been stable.
Add in the BMW, Triumph and other big touring machines like Victories and Indian Harley still has 50% of the touring market covered year after year.
Now just explain in simple words to this not very bright old man how that SUCCESS translates into clueless and stagnation.
Also why did Honda issue a press release a few years back that they would no longer design and build a bike for the US market but only the Asian market? That was after the Rune, VTX and Fury models were such a dismal failure in this country and cost Honda financial losses for years on their US market. Recently I saw a major Chicago area dear list multiple years of NOS bikes from Rebels up at huge discounts.
Oh well, just rambling. Some, like you, toss water on the fire but there are a lot that keep throwing fuel for some reason.
#192
. "Of which HD hasn't a clue. 115 years of stagnation."
Yet since 2000 Honda, Yamaha, Kawasaki and Suzuki large touring machine sales has dropped a full 50% while H-D touring sales has been stable.
Add in the BMW, Triumph and other big touring machines like Victories and Indian Harley still has 50% of the touring market covered year after year.
Now just explain in simple words to this not very bright old man how that SUCCESS translates into clueless and stagnation.
Also why did Honda issue a press release a few years back that they would no longer design and build a bike for the US market but only the Asian market? That was after the Rune, VTX and Fury models were such a dismal failure in this country and cost Honda financial losses for years on their US market. Recently I saw a major Chicago area dear list multiple years of NOS bikes from Rebels up at huge discounts.
Yet since 2000 Honda, Yamaha, Kawasaki and Suzuki large touring machine sales has dropped a full 50% while H-D touring sales has been stable.
Add in the BMW, Triumph and other big touring machines like Victories and Indian Harley still has 50% of the touring market covered year after year.
Now just explain in simple words to this not very bright old man how that SUCCESS translates into clueless and stagnation.
Also why did Honda issue a press release a few years back that they would no longer design and build a bike for the US market but only the Asian market? That was after the Rune, VTX and Fury models were such a dismal failure in this country and cost Honda financial losses for years on their US market. Recently I saw a major Chicago area dear list multiple years of NOS bikes from Rebels up at huge discounts.
#193
Sales are falling. Nobody denies that. But sales are falling overall for all motorcycle makers in America and in Japan. Yes Indian is getting a bigger piece of a smaller pie, but Harley still has 53% of that pie.
#194
This is why I love the Forums.......
#195
I understand what you're saying, but I don't think you're properly presenting the picture. It is my understanding that Harley has 53% of the "big bike" market -- defined as, over 600cc. So that's touring, yes, but it's also cruisers and sportbikes and adventure bikes and nakeds and everything else. If you add up all the BMW GS1200's, Honda CBR1000RR's, Kawasaki Ninja's 600+, etc., etc., etc., and add them all to the Indian and BMW and Big 4 Japanese touring bikes, and all the 600cc sportbikes and 750's and 1000cc supersports and all that, from Italy or England or Japan or wherever... Harley still has a more than 50% market share of that 600cc+ segment.
Sales are falling. Nobody denies that. But sales are falling overall for all motorcycle makers in America and in Japan. Yes Indian is getting a bigger piece of a smaller pie, but Harley still has 53% of that pie.
Sales are falling. Nobody denies that. But sales are falling overall for all motorcycle makers in America and in Japan. Yes Indian is getting a bigger piece of a smaller pie, but Harley still has 53% of that pie.
Bottom line Harley still has the same amount of the marketplace, Harley sells 50% (+/- a couple percent) of all motorcycles in the USA that are over 605cc's.
This has not changed over the last few years, gosh, I still remember when the metric bikes were going to kill Harley, then Victory was going to kill Harley, Victory is out of business and the metrics *** has been wiped in the 600+ cc market.
Its not Harley, its the market, young people are not into motorcycles.
Oh wait, now its Indian that is hurting Harley, NO again *L*
Indian is nothing more then a bee sting on a bear. (so far)
Its easy for Indian to post big sales gain, when you sell 1 motorcycle in one year, then sell 2 motorcycles the next year, that is a 100% increase in sales!
Add to that, Polaris does NOT disclose Indian sales figures, it also classifies the slingshot as a motorcycle so that is also in the sales numbers.
Nothing at all against Indian, glad to see competition, just again, Harley is holding its own and Indian to their credit seems like a quality bike and in the same price range and higher then Harley.
Last edited by alarmdoug; 03-05-2018 at 01:19 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Kyle Moore (03-06-2018)
#197
He winds up so easily and he's entertaining. Everyone on here knows that these things are overpriced.
#198
This is a refreshing thread. Im glad others get it too!
Bottom line Harley still has the same amount of the marketplace, Harley sells 50% (+/- a couple percent) of all motorcycles in the USA that are over 605cc's.
This has not changed over the last few years, gosh, I still remember when the metric bikes were going to kill Harley, then Victory was going to kill Harley, Victory is out of business and the metrics *** has been wiped in the 600+ cc market.
Its not Harley, its the market, young people are not into motorcycles.
Oh wait, now its Indian that is hurting Harley, NO again *L*
Indian is nothing more then a bee sting on a bear. (so far)
Its easy for Indian to post big sales gain, when you sell 1 motorcycle in one year, then sell 2 motorcycles the next year, that is a 100% increase in sales!
Add to that, Polaris does NOT disclose Indian sales figures, it also classifies the slingshot as a motorcycle so that is also in the sales numbers.
Nothing at all against Indian, glad to see competition, just again, Harley is holding its own and Indian to their credit seems like a quality bike and in the same price range and higher then Harley.
Bottom line Harley still has the same amount of the marketplace, Harley sells 50% (+/- a couple percent) of all motorcycles in the USA that are over 605cc's.
This has not changed over the last few years, gosh, I still remember when the metric bikes were going to kill Harley, then Victory was going to kill Harley, Victory is out of business and the metrics *** has been wiped in the 600+ cc market.
Its not Harley, its the market, young people are not into motorcycles.
Oh wait, now its Indian that is hurting Harley, NO again *L*
Indian is nothing more then a bee sting on a bear. (so far)
Its easy for Indian to post big sales gain, when you sell 1 motorcycle in one year, then sell 2 motorcycles the next year, that is a 100% increase in sales!
Add to that, Polaris does NOT disclose Indian sales figures, it also classifies the slingshot as a motorcycle so that is also in the sales numbers.
Nothing at all against Indian, glad to see competition, just again, Harley is holding its own and Indian to their credit seems like a quality bike and in the same price range and higher then Harley.
The following users liked this post:
alarmdoug (03-06-2018)
#199
I’m late to this party so if I’m repaeating something someone else has already said, my apologies. It is to any company’s advantage to price their product as low as they posssibly can without losing money. That includes HD. Once upon a time new Harleys cost a lot more than new Hondas for a few different reasons. First, there was no such thing as a comparable Honda. Japanese bikes were like Japanese cars. Small and underpowered compared to their US made counterparts. They were very reliable but still cheaply made by comparison. Back then, Japanese labor costs were much lower than American labor costs so it naturally cost a lot more to build a motorcycle in the US. These days, the labor cost equation has equalized to a large degree as have the products. Americans who buy top of the line Hondas expect a top quality product and they’re willing to pay for it. Hence, some Goldwing models actually cost more than comparable Harley touring bikes. To say that Harleys cost too much is to single HD out as somehow being more overpriced than other big ticket items. Back in the 80s I thought $16,000 was a ridiculous amount of money for a new Chevrolet. Today, I think I’m getting off light at $40,000. Is General Motors gouging their customers with overpriced vehicles? It would seem so until you compare their prices with Ford and Toyota. Why should Harley Davidson be any different?
#200