Took my bike in for inspection on the recall...
#1
Took my bike in for inspection on the recall...
They tech took a flashlight near the oil cooler and looked in a couple of places for about 30 seconds...then it was over. Is that sufficient? He said everything looked good and I was on my way. I must say I hope he looked good enough. Have any of you witnessed anything different when having your inspection for recall?
#2
They tech took a flashlight near the oil cooler and looked in a couple of places for about 30 seconds...then it was over. Is that sufficient? He said everything looked good and I was on my way. I must say I hope he looked good enough. Have any of you witnessed anything different when having your inspection for recall?
#3
It's pretty easy to see, you should have (3) crimps on the retainer ring to the oil line, the ones that are failing have (2) crimps. I inspected mine in the garage with a flashlight easily, though you have to get low on the ground and pull up on the front of the flexi-plastic oil cooler surround to see the crimps on the two lines tucked behind that piece of plastic.
The following users liked this post:
stixvrad (07-05-2017)
#4
It's pretty easy to see, you should have (3) crimps on the retainer ring to the oil line, the ones that are failing have (2) crimps. I inspected mine in the garage with a flashlight easily, though you have to get low on the ground and pull up on the front of the flexi-plastic oil cooler surround to see the crimps on the two lines tucked behind that piece of plastic.
#6
#7
Finally received my letter in the mail, even though my VIN didn't fall within the affected units. Took the letter to the dealer, and the service guy immediately stepped outside and laid down on the ground to check fittings. He said I was "all good" and sent me on my way. However, I asked for the paperwork showing that the inspection had been completed, which seemed to aggravate him a bit. I waited around about 30 minutes for it, but I wasn't leaving without it. When I sell the bike, I want to have proof that it was checked out, other than telling them that Harley has a record of inspection on file.
Trending Topics
#8
Not trying to be a smart *** but ask the several documented cases that crashed and received injuries if this recall is "really nothing" Anytime there is a possibility of oil or coolant etc dripping in the tires path of travel I consider that pretty serious
#9
Finally received my letter in the mail, even though my VIN didn't fall within the affected units. Took the letter to the dealer, and the service guy immediately stepped outside and laid down on the ground to check fittings. He said I was "all good" and sent me on my way. However, I asked for the paperwork showing that the inspection had been completed, which seemed to aggravate him a bit. I waited around about 30 minutes for it, but I wasn't leaving without it. When I sell the bike, I want to have proof that it was checked out, other than telling them that Harley has a record of inspection on file.
If two crimps mean there could be catastrophic failure, and three crimps mean you're fine - and then you actually SEE the size of those crimps, well - a hose clamp is 10x better but those cost about 8 cents each whereas a crimp cost nothing - so you can see why Harley did the crimp. They save a dollar or two on each bike when you factor in the longer install time for clamps.
Thank the bean counters.
I could care less about paper documentation myself. I don't want the oil lines to come off the bike when I out in the middle of nowhere, so I'll be hose-clamping mine in short order. Those crimps don't inspire confidence.
#10
Just between you, me and the fencepost, I intend to put some small hose clamps on my oil lines, rather than trusting those little, tiny crimps.
If two crimps mean there could be catastrophic failure, and three crimps mean you're fine - and then you actually SEE the size of those crimps, well - a hose clamp is 10x better but those cost about 8 cents each whereas a crimp cost nothing - so you can see why Harley did the crimp. They save a dollar or two on each bike when you factor in the longer install time for clamps.
Thank the bean counters.
I could care less about paper documentation myself. I don't want the oil lines to come off the bike when I out in the middle of nowhere, so I'll be hose-clamping mine in short order. Those crimps don't inspire confidence.
If two crimps mean there could be catastrophic failure, and three crimps mean you're fine - and then you actually SEE the size of those crimps, well - a hose clamp is 10x better but those cost about 8 cents each whereas a crimp cost nothing - so you can see why Harley did the crimp. They save a dollar or two on each bike when you factor in the longer install time for clamps.
Thank the bean counters.
I could care less about paper documentation myself. I don't want the oil lines to come off the bike when I out in the middle of nowhere, so I'll be hose-clamping mine in short order. Those crimps don't inspire confidence.
The positives: they provide better clamping (360° compression) with less damage to the hose.
The negatives: they are single use only and more expensive.
Google "oetiker clamps vs hose clamps" and you'll see a lot on the subject. Many people are switching to the Oetiker style clamps.
I've always seen/used hose clamps in the past. I can't count the times I've found a hose clamp so tight, the rubber hose is bulging out of the slots in the clamp band.... clearly too tight and damaging the hose.
I don't understand the "2 or 3 crimp" issue. Either the ears are crimped or they're not.... The only issue would be using a clamp too big for the application, but then it would be totally crimped, just not putting pressure on the hose.
I believe the recall involved clamps that were installed but not crimped.... pretty easy to see....
Last edited by hattitude; 07-05-2017 at 05:13 PM.
The following users liked this post:
shorelasHD (07-07-2017)