who's been having to add transmission fluid?
#441
Remember the bearing plate sits between the transmission main cavity with the spinning gears, so it blocks any of the oil from getting to the pushrod area. There is one vent hole through the top of the plate but it sits forward of the pushrod area. There is also one oil hole directly below the vent hole down at the bottom of the plate to allow any oil back into the main cavity. The pushrod area only has about a 0.060" gap all around the pushrod area too. This helps prevent any oil mist from get at the pushrod area. So it is truly already covered where they have it now.
I know there are only two holes in the plate itself but doesn't oil pass though the bearings as well?
Just thinking, if oil is delivered into that cavity at a rate directly proportional to the revolutions/speed of the spinning gears, it could be forcing oil through the bearings, the trap door holes, filling the cavity, and thus forcing oil at pressure into the pushrod assembly?
I would think that the faster the gears spin, the greater the pressure into the cavity... which is why this issue really shows up at high RPM like you're verified.
I dunno. On-Paper reverse engineering...
EDIT: Take in mind that the counter shaft gear that is right up against the trapdoor is new, and contains an anti-rattle gear introduced this year.
Since that is the only change gear box side, wonder if that has anything to do with it.
I know it's straight-cut but could it somehow be feeding a bunch of oil into the trapdoor? Enough to raise the oil level at the mouth of the pushrod?
I'm still focused and mystified how oil is actually getting into the pushrod assembly...
Last edited by lp; 07-02-2017 at 12:22 PM.
#442
I don't live in Memphis anymore . I do miss it some times. Even here REDLine in on the shelf. The HD gear box needs a lube that flows easy The redline heavy is just to high a viscosity. It would work ok in the summer but not when it cools down. Left it in my FB once you could feel the drag of it just trying to push the bike.
I did not disrespect the product it is nothing new been around a long time . Like many things it has it's place.
I did not disrespect the product it is nothing new been around a long time . Like many things it has it's place.
#443
At 3k RPMs my bike is traveling 75 MPH. At 3.5k RPMs my bike is traveling 85 MPH. Who is riding their bikes at 4k RPMs consistently? I'm sure there are people out there riding like that, but I suspect if they are then fluid transfer is probably the least of their issues IMHO.
#444
#445
I have the advantage of owning several bikes so I am comparing the '14 with the '17 bikes side by side. The bearing in the '14 appears different than the one in the '17, I did not look the part number up for them. It could be the new anti backlash gear behind the bearing is causing the oil to come through the bearing more, I really do not know. All I do know is once I made the drain path larger it reduce the amount of transfer by well over half. So my next step is to find and get a sealed bearing to fit in place. This will stop all the oil from coming through the bearing into the pushrod area, then see what it does. This is just why I said I do not have a fix just a theory and so far its proving to be at least a part of it, maybe all of it.
#446
I have the advantage of owning several bikes so I am comparing the '14 with the '17 bikes side by side. The bearing in the '14 appears different than the one in the '17, I did not look the part number up for them. It could be the new anti backlash gear behind the bearing is causing the oil to come through the bearing more, I really do not know. All I do know is once I made the drain path larger it reduce the amount of transfer by well over half. So my next step is to find and get a sealed bearing to fit in place. This will stop all the oil from coming through the bearing into the pushrod area, then see what it does. This is just why I said I do not have a fix just a theory and so far its proving to be at least a part of it, maybe all of it.
I mainly looked at the physical differences between the in the area of the tranny and primary. The physical construction of the venting system is different.. It becomes suspect.. At 4000 RPM there is a 67 Hz pulsation from the clutch that travels through the mainshaft. I suspect that it's somehow pulling oil from the tranny to the primary..
I plan on trying Darrel's vent mod but it takes time to see if anything has changed. The best way to test is to create a situation where the issue happens constantly and quickly and work from there. Have done that a bunch of times in the past.
Add:
From what I see being replaced, HD has no clue where the issue is..
Last edited by Max Headflow; 07-02-2017 at 10:44 AM. Reason: ADD:
#447
Yes, so nothing has changed in reference to that side of the equation.
I'm still with the theory that whatever forces the oil up to the level of the pushrod is the same force that is pushing oil down the pushrod. I believe whatever that force is.... grows with RPM.
#448
While we can argue which holes for venting do what, I still believe that the core issues is the slip-assist clutch. It's pulling the oil that builds up around the clutch pushrod through mainshaft.. It may simply be drawing oil due to some motion parted on the rod or the flow of air imparted by the pressure plate.. Each cylinder really only generates force / torque during about 100 degrees of 360 (2 cylinders).. The SA clutch is clamping the clutch pack during that 100 degrees and relaxing for 260. This action is the source of the issue (my belief). What makes it happen on M8s and not TCs has to be something that is different between the bikes.. M8s make more torque. They likely clamp harder. As many have written, you can feel it in the clutch lever. Can you feel it in the clutch lever on a TC?
I mainly looked at the physical differences between the in the area of the tranny and primary. The physical construction of the venting system is different.. It becomes suspect.. At 4000 RPM there is a 67 Hz pulsation from the clutch that travels through the mainshaft. I suspect that it's somehow pulling oil from the tranny to the primary..
I plan on trying Darrel's vent mod but it takes time to see if anything has changed. The best way to test is to create a situation where the issue happens constantly and quickly and work from there. Have done that a bunch of times in the past.
Add:
From what I see being replaced, HD has no clue where the issue is..
I mainly looked at the physical differences between the in the area of the tranny and primary. The physical construction of the venting system is different.. It becomes suspect.. At 4000 RPM there is a 67 Hz pulsation from the clutch that travels through the mainshaft. I suspect that it's somehow pulling oil from the tranny to the primary..
I plan on trying Darrel's vent mod but it takes time to see if anything has changed. The best way to test is to create a situation where the issue happens constantly and quickly and work from there. Have done that a bunch of times in the past.
Add:
From what I see being replaced, HD has no clue where the issue is..
Now for the pulsations, if its pulsing that would mean it pushes back and forth equally, right. If there was no oil at the pushrod area all it would do is move air back and forth. So lets get the oil out of the pushrod area and problem is solved. HD has made the pushrod area covered with a thin slot only to get in or out, I am sure to try and keep the oil out. The fact that its worked this way fine for years and continues to work on the twincam with the same clutch setup has to say something. I do not know if the new gear set is used in other application for '17 model year yet or if its a M8 only thing. I can say I've add a AEM lockup to my bike which pretty much stops the clutch from pulsing at higher RPM and it did not change the transfer rate at all.
#449
It was me that said 1/16". I was just being sarcastic.
Like you've said, you may open that gasket hole as large as you want and air is still only going to be able to move through the restrictive tiny vent tube which it's rate will probably stay the same... low.
The test conducted with the open filler should trump that gasket mod 10 times over...
Like you've said, you may open that gasket hole as large as you want and air is still only going to be able to move through the restrictive tiny vent tube which it's rate will probably stay the same... low.
The test conducted with the open filler should trump that gasket mod 10 times over...
#450
Whoever came up with the gasket cut I have no idea but let's look at what it does. It enlarges the passageway from the main transmission cavity to the breather cavity which is vented to atmosphere. Now I've read here it's a 1/16" slot and the picture looks about 3/4" long give or take. So what it's done is vent more of the main cavity to atmosphere through the breather cavity. What I did was to vent the main case out directly to atmosphere through the fill hole (app 3/4"), both do the same thing only one is a much larger vent to atmosphere! For me it did nothing at all, other than make a mess when the cloth I had over it to catch fumes and mist came out of the way and allow oil mist to come out and onto the starter area that needed to be cleaned up.
A simple, cheap test would be to vent the primary separately. This could easily be done worn drilling and tapping a small hole in a spare derby cover, a barbed fitting and a short price of hose. If it still transferred after that you coil at least rule out primary venting (or I should say lack of).