who's been having to add transmission fluid?
#361
The following users liked this post:
rockymtman (01-05-2018)
#362
Guys lets play nice ok? No one needs school or after school scolding. We are all tryin to figure this out, until there is a permanent fix, NO ONE IS WRONG! The arguments don't solve anything, lets work together! The more ideas and test the sooner we find out. I for one appreciate all the thought process and work going into this issue.
1.) It appears that Motojockey got a new case and gearset, he said as much in his post that they were not one assembly, shipped separately.
2.) We don't know that the NEW CASE is a NEW DESIGN or has been modified by the MOCO or just a replacement.
3.) My bike has experienced this issue NOT ON A DYNO, RAN 4k plus and also RAN under 4k, rpm did not appear to change the amount of transfer IN MY FLHXS.
4.) It seems as though production date does not matter, some early production as well as recent production dates have the issue.
5.) There are pictures (limited view) of a twin cam case vs. the M8 case showing the different vents on the other forum.
Now just thinkin out loud........some guys feel input from shifting thru the clutch lever as I DO but lots of guys don't. It's a question that is way out there I agree but I wonder if there is a connection to that and the oil transfer? And NO I can't explain why or how that could be possible.....but so far, we can't for sure explain the oil transfer either!
We can only hope that the MOCO reads this stuff and is working hard on a solution as well.
Eagle Out
1.) It appears that Motojockey got a new case and gearset, he said as much in his post that they were not one assembly, shipped separately.
2.) We don't know that the NEW CASE is a NEW DESIGN or has been modified by the MOCO or just a replacement.
3.) My bike has experienced this issue NOT ON A DYNO, RAN 4k plus and also RAN under 4k, rpm did not appear to change the amount of transfer IN MY FLHXS.
4.) It seems as though production date does not matter, some early production as well as recent production dates have the issue.
5.) There are pictures (limited view) of a twin cam case vs. the M8 case showing the different vents on the other forum.
Now just thinkin out loud........some guys feel input from shifting thru the clutch lever as I DO but lots of guys don't. It's a question that is way out there I agree but I wonder if there is a connection to that and the oil transfer? And NO I can't explain why or how that could be possible.....but so far, we can't for sure explain the oil transfer either!
We can only hope that the MOCO reads this stuff and is working hard on a solution as well.
Eagle Out
Last edited by 103Eagle; 06-30-2017 at 09:57 PM.
The following users liked this post:
rockymtman (01-05-2018)
#363
Yeah You need to go back to school.. You didn't change the sizes of the chamber that is the transmission case.. You simply poked a small hole in it.. Measure the surface area of the inside of the case and compare it to the hole. It is likely less than 1/20th of the total surface area, probably smaller. Ever play and ocarina? You might have changed the frequency slightly..
Yeah the oil level will shift front to back.. How many G's? . 0.1-0.2 ?
Yeah the oil level will shift front to back.. How many G's? . 0.1-0.2 ?
#364
Can we assume any oil drainback function (from the oiled bearings into the outer shaft area near the clutch slave unit) remained the same between the A and B suffix parts? The suffix changed for 2017 from the parts fiche unless you have reason so suspect otherwise.
The two outer support bearings appear to be the same P/N between years unless an internal change in the cage or ? has made them by design oil feeders now.
Just exploring some ideas.
We don't know if the replacement transmissions differ from stock 2017 units do we? They may be, or they may just be parts bin replacements in hopes of a repair.
If someone thinks the gasket has a resonance double them up.
The two outer support bearings appear to be the same P/N between years unless an internal change in the cage or ? has made them by design oil feeders now.
Just exploring some ideas.
We don't know if the replacement transmissions differ from stock 2017 units do we? They may be, or they may just be parts bin replacements in hopes of a repair.
If someone thinks the gasket has a resonance double them up.
#365
OK, so making a 3/4" change to allow any and all the pressure in the transmission case to escape out the hole is no different. Guess we went to different schools. As LP pointed out a little change makes a huge change in Hz. Your suggested change is what? You did not change the exit orifice size at all so the chamber size never changed just allowed the transmission case a slight larger and I do mean very slightly, path into the breather chamber. All pressures and volumes remain the same. All I can say is good luck with it.
Yeah cut it n half and the problem is gone..
#366
We need to put pre and post 2017 transmission components on a table and have a look. We do know there are part changes listed for 2017 if the online fiche data from HD is to be believed.
The guts and gears may have been improved recently which would be a third design iteration. Whatever fixes the issue needs to be implemented.
It's quite a stretch to believe HD hasn't observed it in their testing program to date and developed a fix, which may only be a machining correction of some component. They have the resources to do that unlike owners and service folks trying to make a profit. It may also be a vendor specific problem that varied from HD's design.
Lots of unknowns so I'll hold my head and be calm.
Edit: Oh and the clutch lever pulse is common to slip/assist clutches that by their load and unload action move the actuator components hydraulically up through the lever. Common to BMW's with a similar clutch in my experience.
The guts and gears may have been improved recently which would be a third design iteration. Whatever fixes the issue needs to be implemented.
It's quite a stretch to believe HD hasn't observed it in their testing program to date and developed a fix, which may only be a machining correction of some component. They have the resources to do that unlike owners and service folks trying to make a profit. It may also be a vendor specific problem that varied from HD's design.
Lots of unknowns so I'll hold my head and be calm.
Edit: Oh and the clutch lever pulse is common to slip/assist clutches that by their load and unload action move the actuator components hydraulically up through the lever. Common to BMW's with a similar clutch in my experience.
Last edited by PA1195; 06-30-2017 at 11:10 PM.
The following users liked this post:
rockymtman (01-05-2018)
#367
well the good thing is the 'ice breaker' has apparently occurred with the MOCO..one would think the engineering team has been tasked to prioritize their resources and attention accordingly as to not wait for this to overwhelm them if they believe the flood gates may potentially open..which we don't really have any fact driven knowledge of real World scope at this time, which would be warranty claims vs units sold = rate of failure. hopefully they are getting out ahead of this regardless of the numbers they are seeing
Last edited by mjwebb; 06-30-2017 at 11:41 PM.
#368
#369
In terms of frequency, a musical instrument may have small or large holes that affect resonance greatly. Big or small, both have a measurable affect.
I find it weird to argue that enlarging a vent hole 1/16 would be a plausible fix, but putting an even larger 3/4 hole would have no affect because the "case is so large". Weird argument. Lost.
The 3/4 hole is closer to the source as well. The vent tube is miles away from the main shaft.
Anyway. Kinda with Steve on this one. I figure he's not paper troubleshooting, and is actually trying stuff physically because he has resources.
More over, his theory sounds more plausible to me. No offence Max, but I know you tend to over think sometimes. Just wondering if this is one of those times. No biggie.
Last edited by lp; 07-01-2017 at 06:43 AM.