Milwaukee Eight (M8) 2017 and up M8 Air and Liquid Cooled discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The rumor of a new frame ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 03-05-2017 | 11:56 AM
steveg56's Avatar
steveg56
Road Captain
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 555
Likes: 75
From: California
Default

I think they really need to redesign the frame for better suspension. There simply is not enough travel in the rear of the current frame set up. Indian and Victory had 5 and 6" of rear travel and it was felt by the nice plush ride. Harley needs to go to a monoshock to keep the ride height low and have the kind of travel we need on our touring bikes. My 2017 M8 RGS is better this year, but still not where it needs to be.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by steveg56:
MoRider (07-03-2017), WildX (08-05-2017)
  #12  
Old 03-05-2017 | 11:56 AM
Piloto's Avatar
Piloto
Seasoned HDF Member
Veteran: Army
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 18,479
From: Displaced Texan
Default

Marketing!!!

Thousands of riders will race to dump their now "obsolete" low mileage 2017's, for a shiny new 2018 that might ride just a little better.
 
  #13  
Old 03-05-2017 | 12:06 PM
Campy Roadie's Avatar
Campy Roadie
Seasoned HDF Member
Veteran: Marine Corp
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,793
Likes: 5,073
From: SW Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by steveg56
I think they really need to redesign the frame for better suspension. There simply is not enough travel in the rear of the current frame set u.
The first thing 99% of Harley buyers would do is Install lowering blocks or shocks with 2" of travel.
 
The following users liked this post:
LagunaGlide (03-06-2017)
  #14  
Old 03-05-2017 | 12:12 PM
TwiZted Biker's Avatar
TwiZted Biker
Club Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 65,106
Likes: 49,186
From: Niles Canyon Ca.
Default

Originally Posted by Nomadmax
The first thing 99% of Harley buyers would do is Install lowering blocks or shocks with 2" of travel.
No ****

It boggles my mind these guys buy a low riding heavy wide bike then slam it down so it can't clear a decent speed bump then bitch about the ride and how the tech is so old.
 

Last edited by TwiZted Biker; 03-05-2017 at 12:14 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by TwiZted Biker:
Campy Roadie (03-09-2017), Mxdad (03-30-2017), Uncle Larry (03-06-2017)
  #15  
Old 03-05-2017 | 01:44 PM
purpledeuce's Avatar
purpledeuce
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 642
Default

They're going to save money by having a more standardized frame
 
The following users liked this post:
Tony P (03-06-2017)
  #16  
Old 03-05-2017 | 02:08 PM
jclax01's Avatar
jclax01
Road Warrior
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 481
From: St Louis
Default

Aluminum frames are probably going to happen one day, but in the meantime, I sure do appreciate that "heavy" touring frame when I am on the highway with 20 mph cross winds hitting me. I hate getting blown around on the highway.

I doubt if we ever see a touring frame on the dyna and softail models. that would really be against what the riders of those models want. But you never know.
 
The following users liked this post:
Mxdad (08-09-2017)
  #17  
Old 03-05-2017 | 06:41 PM
YPD485's Avatar
YPD485
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 157
Default

Originally Posted by Yamaharley
They really should go aluminium, at least the subframe. Shave some weight off the touring line.
You would think an aluminum frame would save weight but often since they need to make the aluminum strong enough for a motorcycle, it winds up weighing just about as much as the steel frame. Ask Honda about that when they went to an aluminum frame on the 2001 Goldwing 1800. Didn't really lose any weight when compared to the prior steel frame Goldwing 1500. And to this day, they are still having problems with the aluminum frame cracking.
 
  #18  
Old 03-05-2017 | 06:54 PM
MatteGlide15's Avatar
MatteGlide15
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,651
Likes: 1,272
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by Nomadmax
The first thing 99% of Harley buyers would do is Install lowering blocks or shocks with 2" of travel.

 
The following users liked this post:
Campy Roadie (03-09-2017)
  #19  
Old 03-05-2017 | 06:56 PM
Uncle G.'s Avatar
Uncle G.
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,257
Likes: 3,779
From: Upstate New York
Default

Originally Posted by YPD485
You would think an aluminum frame would save weight but often since they need to make the aluminum strong enough for a motorcycle, it winds up weighing just about as much as the steel frame. Ask Honda about that when they went to an aluminum frame on the 2001 Goldwing 1800. Didn't really lose any weight when compared to the prior steel frame Goldwing 1500. And to this day, they are still having problems with the aluminum frame cracking.
The problem with aluminum as a structural material is that ALL stress is cumulative in aluminum, unlike steel. In an aluminum structure, any stress, no matter how small will contribute to eventual failure.


Think about that next time you get on a commercial airliner.
 
  #20  
Old 03-05-2017 | 07:37 PM
Dale Cummings's Avatar
Dale Cummings
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by steveg56
I think they really need to redesign the frame for better suspension. There simply is not enough travel in the rear of the current frame set up. Indian and Victory had 5 and 6" of rear travel and it was felt by the nice plush ride. Harley needs to go to a monoshock to keep the ride height low and have the kind of travel we need on our touring bikes. My 2017 M8 RGS is better this year, but still not where it needs to be.
I agree! The Indian uses an aluminum back bone with steel down tubes. And the Polaris Indian actually has 4.5 inches of travel, which is more than enough compared to the Street/Road Glides 2.1 inches.
 


Quick Reply: The rumor of a new frame ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.