Power Vision Information Thread
#831
06-26-2011, 01:38 AM
Noticed yesterday while riding with a buddy my speedo seemed to be a little off so when I opened up Winpv to look at my original stock tune under Gear and speedo calibration it says 2074 and the tune I have loaded it says 2179 , should I change it to the stock calibration?
-Dusty
#834
06-27-2011, 12:59 AM
Tourer
#835
06-27-2011, 07:00 AM
Road Warrior
#836
06-27-2011, 07:03 AM
Road Warrior
Is there anyone who has access to the changelogs showing what changes were made when software or firmware is updated?
I know the software writers make them. Is there any reason they do not feel a need to supply the list of changes?
A normal changelog contains lists of bug fixes, improvements and other minor and major changes.
Michael
I know the software writers make them. Is there any reason they do not feel a need to supply the list of changes?
A normal changelog contains lists of bug fixes, improvements and other minor and major changes.
Michael
http://www.dynojet.com/newdynojet/do...Power%20Vision
#837
06-27-2011, 09:29 AM
Here is a start that I created quickly using some of Jamie's posts, my notes and adding information I learned from tuning. This is a first pass and will gladly take suggestions and corrections. Let me know if this is helpful. I tuned first with the stock O2 sensors and am now using the Autotune Wideband sensors. I can add that to the instructions later unless DynoJet comes out with a better manual first. Iclick, we can collaborate on this if you like. If this is helpful, I can take input and create a more comprehensive manual if needed.
http://www.box.net/shared/i66qvn4xf1s2xp7fgy8v
http://www.box.net/shared/i66qvn4xf1s2xp7fgy8v
would the multiple option of me opening 2-3 log files create a better avg when i click the CALC TUNE bar ?
#839
06-27-2011, 09:51 AM
Road Warrior
I had a pretty big log from a ride Saturday afternoon while I was in the mountains. I didn't get a chance to create a new calibration from it yet and I created another log on the way to work this morning. They were from very different type rides but from the same base map, so I pulled them both in to cover more areas of the calibration. Hope that makes sense.
As a side note: I had been using PV Log Tuner 1.0.6 and just noticed that Dynojet had posted version 1.0.8 to their download website. I downloaded and started using it on this last calculations. I actually compared the output from 1.0.6 and 1.0.8 on the same calibrations, value files and logs and got same results. Just FYI.
Last edited by JustDennis; 06-27-2011 at 10:05 AM.
#840
06-27-2011, 11:24 AM
Multiple logs just provide more data. As a matter of fact, I used two logs this morning. Just be sure the multiple logs are captured using the same base map. Pull them both in to Log tuner and process as normal. I have used 2 log several times and they seem to work well.
I had a pretty big log from a ride Saturday afternoon while I was in the mountains. I didn't get a chance to create a new calibration from it yet and I created another log on the way to work this morning. They were from very different type rides but from the same base map, so I pulled them both in to cover more areas of the calibration. Hope that makes sense.
As a side note: I had been using PV Log Tuner 1.0.6 and just noticed that Dynojet had posted version 1.0.8 to their download website. I downloaded and started using it on this last calculations. I actually compared the output from 1.0.6 and 1.0.8 on the same calibrations, value files and logs and got same results. Just FYI.
I had a pretty big log from a ride Saturday afternoon while I was in the mountains. I didn't get a chance to create a new calibration from it yet and I created another log on the way to work this morning. They were from very different type rides but from the same base map, so I pulled them both in to cover more areas of the calibration. Hope that makes sense.
As a side note: I had been using PV Log Tuner 1.0.6 and just noticed that Dynojet had posted version 1.0.8 to their download website. I downloaded and started using it on this last calculations. I actually compared the output from 1.0.6 and 1.0.8 on the same calibrations, value files and logs and got same results. Just FYI.