Power Vision Information Thread
#5741
You're right, I stand corrected.
It has a Closed Loop Lambda Range setting with a min and max.(is this the same/similar as CLB?)
IIRC stock is set to 14.2 min with a 15.0 max, I'm assuming that the afr cells that fall within that range sends the ECM in closed loop and anything outside that range would be open loop.
If this is true I'm wondering how far (extreme) can I push these values?
Could I widen the values to bring more afr cells into closed loop
(13.8-15.0)?
Widen what values? What areas do you want to be in closed loop? What areas do you want to be in open loop? And, more importantly, why?
Could I shift the range from stock setting down to 13.5-14.5 bringing the richer values into closed loop?
No
Chances are I'm not going to mess with it (I don't see any reason to) but I'm just trying to get a basic understanding of the concept and how they effect that it has with PV.
It doesn't affect the PV. The PV affects it.
Thanks
EDIT: While playing around with the Winpv I think I may have figured it out.
It has a Closed Loop Lambda Range setting with a min and max.(is this the same/similar as CLB?)
IIRC stock is set to 14.2 min with a 15.0 max, I'm assuming that the afr cells that fall within that range sends the ECM in closed loop and anything outside that range would be open loop.
If this is true I'm wondering how far (extreme) can I push these values?
Could I widen the values to bring more afr cells into closed loop
(13.8-15.0)?
Widen what values? What areas do you want to be in closed loop? What areas do you want to be in open loop? And, more importantly, why?
Could I shift the range from stock setting down to 13.5-14.5 bringing the richer values into closed loop?
No
Chances are I'm not going to mess with it (I don't see any reason to) but I'm just trying to get a basic understanding of the concept and how they effect that it has with PV.
It doesn't affect the PV. The PV affects it.
Thanks
EDIT: While playing around with the Winpv I think I may have figured it out.
#5744
Need help from PV2 owners!
Hi, I have recently switched from '09 FLHTP to '14 FLHR, so I am in need of a new cable for my Power Vision.
I know that the cable is only different on the bike connector side.
I have 6-pin Deutsch connector, but cannot find any info on pinout.
There are 4 wires in the cable – red, black, white and green.
Please, anyone with the PV2 cable, can you take a look what colour goes to what pin?
Your help is MUCH appreciated!
I know that the cable is only different on the bike connector side.
I have 6-pin Deutsch connector, but cannot find any info on pinout.
There are 4 wires in the cable – red, black, white and green.
Please, anyone with the PV2 cable, can you take a look what colour goes to what pin?
Your help is MUCH appreciated!
#5745
#5746
If I'm not mistaken, when you tune in "Pro" mode your timing stays the same; but, your AFR is changed to 13.2 for the session. I only had a chance to work with it a little before I put the bike away. I do remember that the cells filled more quickly with the wide bands. I also played around with the autotuning the timing but I've got CRS at the moment.
#5747
#5748
Finally!
I've read it all, (well most of it anyway). Alot of good info, and a good knowledge base to pull from, but.... after all that reading, and the different changes, and opinions, and changing opinions, I might still need to ask a question or two from time to time. And I'll be happy to pitch in when I can.
So the ride, a second hand 2004 RK Custom with 95" big bore kit, SE HTCC Heads and pistons, SE breather, and V&H Propipe, with unknown cams. Dyno and remap from dealer. Mods done back in '07 at 9000 miles, I picked it up last summer with 12000 miles. I've put on another 3500.
Picked up the PV and AT pro from FM TOD (the other day). Glad I did, the dyno'ed map had large area at 14.6. Now without the feedback of the O2 sensors ala 07, this is not where I want the bike to be. Heck I wouldn't want it there even with the feedback, but at least would have some certainty (with in the bounds of sensor accuracy and such, yes Jim) that it wasn't even leaner. Anyway, on travel for a few weeks, when I get back, get the bungs installed, exhaust back together, PV installed and on to logging and tuning.
When I run into a problem that I can't remember the answer to, or where in this haystack the needle lies, I'll ask.
So the ride, a second hand 2004 RK Custom with 95" big bore kit, SE HTCC Heads and pistons, SE breather, and V&H Propipe, with unknown cams. Dyno and remap from dealer. Mods done back in '07 at 9000 miles, I picked it up last summer with 12000 miles. I've put on another 3500.
Picked up the PV and AT pro from FM TOD (the other day). Glad I did, the dyno'ed map had large area at 14.6. Now without the feedback of the O2 sensors ala 07, this is not where I want the bike to be. Heck I wouldn't want it there even with the feedback, but at least would have some certainty (with in the bounds of sensor accuracy and such, yes Jim) that it wasn't even leaner. Anyway, on travel for a few weeks, when I get back, get the bungs installed, exhaust back together, PV installed and on to logging and tuning.
When I run into a problem that I can't remember the answer to, or where in this haystack the needle lies, I'll ask.
#5749
Hi Everyone,
I got my PV last Thursday and have spent the weekend do AT runs and reading this sticky, up to page 454. I have my VE's set, last run showed 2% average change. I am having a problem with Log Tuner. I open the .pvv file and the .csv file, hit calc tune and I get a warning stating VE and/or Target table(s) missing from value file. Anyone know what I am doing wrong???
Thanks.
I got my PV last Thursday and have spent the weekend do AT runs and reading this sticky, up to page 454. I have my VE's set, last run showed 2% average change. I am having a problem with Log Tuner. I open the .pvv file and the .csv file, hit calc tune and I get a warning stating VE and/or Target table(s) missing from value file. Anyone know what I am doing wrong???
Thanks.
#5750