Power Vision Information Thread
#231
Does anyone here know if the Adaptive Fuel and Idle trims should be reset each time a new tune is flashed to the ECM? The manual recommends resetting them prior to each tuning session, but doesen't say what to do when flashing a new custom tune. Seems like the more I get into playing with the PV the more questions I have.
#232
#233
In the AFR tables, higher values mean leaner mixtures. But in the VE tables, higher values would be richer. So in the WinPV software, the AFR table is a sub-section of the "Fuel" tune items. And the VE table is a sub-section of the "Airflow" tune items. Seems like they should be reversed, IMO.
If you raise values in VE, you're adding "FUEL", If you raise values in AFR, you're adding "AIR"... well, kinda?... Oh well, no biggie, sounded good in my head.
#234
Does anyone here know if the Adaptive Fuel and Idle trims should be reset each time a new tune is flashed to the ECM? The manual recommends resetting them prior to each tuning session, but doesen't say what to do when flashing a new custom tune. Seems like the more I get into playing with the PV the more questions I have.
__________________
Jamie Long / Fuel Moto USA
The USA's Leader V-Twin EFI & Performance www.fuelmotousa.com
Contact 920-423-3309
Email jamie@fuelmotousa.com
Jamie Long / Fuel Moto USA
The USA's Leader V-Twin EFI & Performance www.fuelmotousa.com
Contact 920-423-3309
Email jamie@fuelmotousa.com
#235
VE is a direct representation of the airflow model based on cylinder fill and the ECM uses this to calculate fuel requirements, raising this value richens the mixture while lowering leans the mixture. The AFR/Lambda table is essentially a table that represents the AFR the VE table was calibrated to. For example, if VE is synchronized correctly the AFR/Lambda table should reflect the actual mixture going out the tailpipe. On O2 sensor equipped bikes featuring calibrations with an AFR table this table along with the O2 bias table are used as a closed loop control however the AFR must be set to 14.6 to trigger closed loop, you then use the O2 bias table to set the value the ECM is looking for. Lambda based calibration use the lambda value itself as a control and closed loop is triggered with values of .98-1.02. Whether you have a Lambda or AFR calibration, the calibration give you the ability to set the closed loop area from approx 14.30-15:0:1 AFR as an end result, if you are looking for a richer (or leaner) mixture it will be open loop.
Hope this info helps
Hope this info helps
#237
That's the way I did it. My AT-100 and eliminators are still in place, although the latter don't need to be installed after if you run the PCV import feature. When you do that it inserts 14.5 where 14.6 existed before, and that disables closed-loop negating the need for the eliminators. I would just leave them in unless you decide to go back to the stock O2 sensors, which is doubtful since you have the AT-100 installed.
Thanks iclick.
#238
#239
Use the Speedometer Calibration setting. Raise it to lower the reading on the speedometer and vice versa. As a reference, my original value was 2058 and my speedometer was 4% fast (reading about 62.5mph at an actual 60mph) and 2135 was the right number to get it spot-on with my GPS.
The odometer changes with the Speedometer Calibration, so if the speedo reading is reduced by 4% so is the odometer, or at least that's the case on my bike. Originally, my odometer was 2% fast and changing the Speedometer Calibration made the odometer 2% slow, but that doesn't concern me as much as an errant speedometer.
Oddly, what the mechanical speedometer and ECM read as the speed are different. If you'll assign a gauge to the ECM speedometer signal ("Vehicle Speed" I believe it's called, or similar) you'll see the disparity, but I can't see a downside to having the ECM speed a bit high or low. I don't even know what that signal does in normal riding.
The odometer changes with the Speedometer Calibration, so if the speedo reading is reduced by 4% so is the odometer, or at least that's the case on my bike. Originally, my odometer was 2% fast and changing the Speedometer Calibration made the odometer 2% slow, but that doesn't concern me as much as an errant speedometer.
Oddly, what the mechanical speedometer and ECM read as the speed are different. If you'll assign a gauge to the ECM speedometer signal ("Vehicle Speed" I believe it's called, or similar) you'll see the disparity, but I can't see a downside to having the ECM speed a bit high or low. I don't even know what that signal does in normal riding.
Last edited by iclick; 04-07-2011 at 10:52 AM.
#240
Use the Speedometer Calibration setting. Raise it to lower the reading on the speedometer and vice versa. As a reference, my original value was 2058 and my speedometer was 4% fast (reading about 62.5mph at an actual 60mph) and 2135 was the right number to get it spot-on with my GPS.
The odometer changes with the Speedometer Calibration, so if the speedo reading is reduced by 4% so is the odometer, or at least that's the case on my bike. Originally, my odometer was 2% fast and changing the Speedometer Calibration made the odometer 2% slow, but that doesn't concern me as much as an errant speedometer.
Oddly, what the mechanical speedometer and ECM read as the speed are different. If you'll assign a gauge to the ECM speedometer signal ("Vehicle Speed" I believe it's called, or similar) you'll see the disparity, but I can't see a downside to having the ECM speed a bit high or low. I don't even know what that signal does in normal riding.
The odometer changes with the Speedometer Calibration, so if the speedo reading is reduced by 4% so is the odometer, or at least that's the case on my bike. Originally, my odometer was 2% fast and changing the Speedometer Calibration made the odometer 2% slow, but that doesn't concern me as much as an errant speedometer.
Oddly, what the mechanical speedometer and ECM read as the speed are different. If you'll assign a gauge to the ECM speedometer signal ("Vehicle Speed" I believe it's called, or similar) you'll see the disparity, but I can't see a downside to having the ECM speed a bit high or low. I don't even know what that signal does in normal riding.