SEPro/SEStreet Tuner Information Thread
#2612
Awesome, thanks for that. At least all that wasnt a complete waste of time. And yes the cops are going crazy over here. Anyone on a Harley is a target, even if your not in an outlaw gang!!
#2613
#2614
#2615
Best case scenario is that nothing goes wrong!!
#2616
I'm considering the race tuner for my SGS that is supposed to deliver in a couple weeks. The dealership says it will not void the warranty on my bike, but the HD literature about the race tuner suggests it will. What has been everyone's experience with these tuners and warranties?
#2617
I'm considering the race tuner for my SGS that is supposed to deliver in a couple weeks. The dealership says it will not void the warranty on my bike, but the HD literature about the race tuner suggests it will. What has been everyone's experience with these tuners and warranties?
#2619
K&N Filter
Hey guys, I got my new K&N oval shaped pod AC on today and did a smart tune run to see what would happen! The VEs did what I thought was very odd. I the low rpm/low tp cells the numbers increased by .5 to 3.5%, mid range was generally 2-3% increase, the odd part is they DEcreased by as much as 7-8% in the higher rpm/80%-WOT cells. So to me that says the new AC flows better down low but worse up high, is that even possible? So if my VEs are coming down, should I go back into the constants and bring the CI back down closer to what it actually is? or just leave it be and just be happy that my bike is running a sh*tload better than it was a few months ago? Im thinking I'll just do a few more data runs and that might be it! One last thing, I think it was UltraNutz said a while back once the VEs are within 5% move on! If I'm recording 0 knock events and don't need to mess with timing, What am I moving on to??? Thanks, Matt.
#2620
Hey guys, I got my new K&N oval shaped pod AC on today and did a smart tune run to see what would happen! The VEs did what I thought was very odd. I the low rpm/low tp cells the numbers increased by .5 to 3.5%, mid range was generally 2-3% increase, the odd part is they DEcreased by as much as 7-8% in the higher rpm/80%-WOT cells. So to me that says the new AC flows better down low but worse up high, is that even possible? So if my VEs are coming down, should I go back into the constants and bring the CI back down closer to what it actually is? or just leave it be and just be happy that my bike is running a sh*tload better than it was a few months ago? Im thinking I'll just do a few more data runs and that might be it! One last thing, I think it was UltraNutz said a while back once the VEs are within 5% move on! If I'm recording 0 knock events and don't need to mess with timing, What am I moving on to??? Thanks, Matt.
you have a 95ci. previously you increased the ci (to?) as the VE was approaching 125. you also went to 780 on clb. you changed the AC.
what I am getting at is that you are doing multiple things where one may affect another.
I will suggest that you save the current map and put the base map back in there, do 2-3 smartune enabled datalogs, update the VE and then compare the VE to your map you have been working with up until now.
Before any other changes I am saying do smartunes to tweak the VE. If again you approach 125, let us know.
Once the VE is changing within 5%, then change richer if you want, timing etc