Mine are set at 739. I had read a while back about people setting up their SERTs with CLBs at 798. There was discussion about reduced sensor life at that setting. I was concerned about going to high and this was about as close as I could get it to 750 which was just a random number I pulled outta my a$$. Anyway...it runs GREAT !

 

My timing tables are also advance 3 degrees from the PZ176 calibration. FWIW....

 

When loaded on my RK09 bike:
- cruise control does not work (orange light never turns green, speed not maintained)
- 6th speed light does not light
- The new primary ratio adjust seems not to work correctly. No matter what you set it, when you save and re-open the file the ratio is always set at 1.250
- the RPM limit only goes down to 5600, prior versions go down to 4000 (this is not a bug, but an unexpected/undesired "feature")

Best regards.

 

yes, I set all of the cells to the same number on my VE bias table. Doc had recommended to me, when I asked him about setting this number higher, to not to go over 780mv that it could shorten the life of the O2 sensors. It is a small range to choose from there, but the bike is not under much of a load in closed loop.

My bike has never run better on both power and mpg when compared to the PCIIIB that I had on.

 

emece

What are you trying to use? I can run each file and save with no issues here. Our test bike is a 2009 and it works perfectly. We have run and tested 4 total different gear ratio's without issue. What language are you using on your PC? See if you set your PC to English if the problem goes away.

 

I'm using ratio 1.363 (stock). PC in spanish, when switched to english the primary ratio issue disappeared !? Will the other (cruise/6th gear) problems also disappear?

Best regards.

 

Yes, all the issues are tied together. Our guess is that when switching Language on the PC it's interpreting things different causing the issue. We will look into it and come out with a fix once we know what's doing it for sure but our first guess is it is interpreting the . and , differently from one language to another. Make sure to not use any files you created with the ratio wrong. Just throw them away and start with the base file again.

 

Steve,

I ran the TTS Updater last night and noticed a new PZ176 map.

Could you tell us what the main differences are between the original PZ176 and the new PZ176 map?

I did notice a fair amount of change in the timing tables.

For example, in the 50 cell at 2500, the timing was increased from 38 to 45.5. Was there a timing issue in the original version?
Some advanced the timing by 3 degrees on the original. Would this be advised with the new version?

Should those of us running the old vtuned PZ176 re-run the vtune process using the new version?

 

Just one question. If I were to go to the new C level TD205 file, am I starting over from scratch? Or can I use any of my v-tune data from my prior runs with the older TD205 calibration?

 

I've used the VE, SA and CLB tables from my previous calibrations.

Best regards.