Nightrider O2 IED's - Field Test
#3211
I've noticed the wide differences of opinion about the product and your seemingly knowledgable arguments which of course arouses some suspicion.
And I find it curious that nightrider doesn't have any supporting data on it's site. Seems like it would be a simple matter to run a couple tests. Something along the lines of before and after dyno or temp results.
You say this product would be good for a stock bike. But as you've said there have been some pretty outlandish results posted in this thread. Based on your knowledge of efi systems and tuning, which results should a user of the IED on a stock bike have a reasonable expection of obtaining?.
And I find it curious that nightrider doesn't have any supporting data on it's site. Seems like it would be a simple matter to run a couple tests. Something along the lines of before and after dyno or temp results.
You say this product would be good for a stock bike. But as you've said there have been some pretty outlandish results posted in this thread. Based on your knowledge of efi systems and tuning, which results should a user of the IED on a stock bike have a reasonable expection of obtaining?.
#3212
Dyno results
I've noticed the wide differences of opinion about the product and your seemingly knowledgable arguments which of course arouses some suspicion.
And I find it curious that nightrider doesn't have any supporting data on it's site. Seems like it would be a simple matter to run a couple tests. Something along the lines of before and after dyno or temp results.
You say this product would be good for a stock bike. But as you've said there have been some pretty outlandish results posted in this thread. Based on your knowledge of efi systems and tuning, which results should a user of the IED on a stock bike have a reasonable expection of obtaining?.
And I find it curious that nightrider doesn't have any supporting data on it's site. Seems like it would be a simple matter to run a couple tests. Something along the lines of before and after dyno or temp results.
You say this product would be good for a stock bike. But as you've said there have been some pretty outlandish results posted in this thread. Based on your knowledge of efi systems and tuning, which results should a user of the IED on a stock bike have a reasonable expection of obtaining?.
You can also see I changed to the TTS MasterTune after doing the stage 1 thing.
Steve
#3214
I have a pair of originals and Xieds that I used on my 08 and now have an 09 are the originals equal to the x14s or 02s ????
#3216
How do you account for such a significant performance increase?. Stands to reason that if the ieds were capable of such a result, nightrider would be making claims about it. And as you pointed out they were only designed to make the bike run cooler, hence no dyno testing/results by nightrider.
Moving on to the cooling issue. If the product does indeed make the bike run cooler why aren't there any testing results of that so buyers have some idea what sort of typical reduction in temp they can expect to achieve. Instead seems all I've seen to date is testimonial evidence.
Moving on to the cooling issue. If the product does indeed make the bike run cooler why aren't there any testing results of that so buyers have some idea what sort of typical reduction in temp they can expect to achieve. Instead seems all I've seen to date is testimonial evidence.
#3218
The information you seek is at this link:
http://www.nightrider.com/parts/ied_product_line.htm
There is then another whole discussion on narrow band versus wide band O2 sensor.
http://www.nightrider.com/parts/ied_product_line.htm
There is then another whole discussion on narrow band versus wide band O2 sensor.
#3219
The information you seek is at this link:
http://www.nightrider.com/parts/ied_product_line.htm
There is then another whole discussion on narrow band versus wide band O2 sensor.
http://www.nightrider.com/parts/ied_product_line.htm
There is then another whole discussion on narrow band versus wide band O2 sensor.
#3220
That brings to mind one of the arguments in favor of the *IEDs ("*" being a wildcard covering all models). It went something like "If you don't notice a difference after putting them on, just take them off after riding a while and notice the immediate [less-desirable] difference that way." That's invalid. The closest way to doing a valid comparison would be to reset the AFVs at the time of the change, either direction. This would get you "apples to apples," but the apples aren't ripe yet. They need time to ripen before actual measurements can be taken, and making the change and resetting the AFVs makes the apple green again each time. So now, great care must be taken in duplicating the environmental conditions each time a test is performed, after the AFVs have settled the same amount in each configuration.
Funny, the nightrider link in the post just above shows "yes" for compatibility with "Exhaust and/or Air Cleaner upgrades". The footnote for that "yes" says "Tested configurations and results by independent riders can be found at HDForums.com IED thread." THIS VERY THREAD. If this thread points to that web page for something which that web page points to this thread, well, I guess that'd be the textbook definition of "circular reasoning."
Footnote 15 there says "Tuning Guidelines for using the O2 IED with the Power Commander are available." I don't know where; it doesn't say. I'll give them here so the circular reasoning can be more complete:
+ perform any (or none) breathing modifications to your bike
+ install Power Commander and reset Delphi AFVs to 100%
+ put bike on dyno or use a TwinScan II+ and tune, as best you can using the PC tables, all of the throttle-position/MAP cells in your stock (or current) Delphi AFR tables to match the AFR value they contain (good luck knowing what/where they all are!) [note that this will be very tough to do, if not nigh unto impossible to do completely correct]
+ install *IEDs (or LC-1s) in place of the PC "O2 eliminators"
+ operate engine in sufficient areas to establish new AFVs
+ re-tune PC map in any areas of operation which are open-loop and have become richer than you'd previously tuned
The trick is to get the tune, after your mods, back to exactly what the current Delphi programming supplies. This will accurately accommodate your mods and only then allow for non-use of the PC "O2 eliminators". If you don't do this you'll be in for a world of dissatisfaction. I've toyed with a PC in service along with the O2 sensors on-line. It gets ugly very quickly when just done haphazardly.