Nightrider O2 IED's - Field Test
#3091
Steve;
I think we are thinking the same thing, but talking from two different directions. Yes, the O2 sensor only measures the the free O2 in the exhaust. I am familiar with discussions about the level of oxygenation agents in the fuel and the variations that exist. But you are the first one I have ever hear mention a "14.2 Stoich" fuel. You aren't talking about the specific gravity of the fuel, are you?
Can you enlighten me to were I can find more documentation on this? Who is currently publishing research on this right now?
I think we are thinking the same thing, but talking from two different directions. Yes, the O2 sensor only measures the the free O2 in the exhaust. I am familiar with discussions about the level of oxygenation agents in the fuel and the variations that exist. But you are the first one I have ever hear mention a "14.2 Stoich" fuel. You aren't talking about the specific gravity of the fuel, are you?
Can you enlighten me to were I can find more documentation on this? Who is currently publishing research on this right now?
#3092
#3094
That post was by no means any form of an attack on anyone. I addressed it to cruiser because he's running those parts on his bike and I wanted him to be able to see how a base map for them differs from a stock base map. I figured that after a thousand words a picture might better illustrate the idea.
Yes, he has. At least since his latest attempt he has not subsequently (so far as I know; I haven't yet read anything after your post I'm responding to, yet) backhanded me while addressing someone else. Other than that particular, repeated action on his part I harbor no ill will towards him. This should be evident by my continually trying to help him understand this stuff. I guess if that makes me a bully then the definition of that word must have changed some time in the past several years and I'm behind the times.
Then you and I have some things in common. If I'm discussing something with someone and my information is different than theirs, I research further and discuss some more, wanting to be on the same page as them. Don't you do that?
Yeah. I'd been away from the site for a few days and upon my return saw several non-love comments about me.
If that's what you want I guess I could try; but can't promise you any satisfaction. All you have to do is take the first offensive maneuver to set things in motion. It's especially effective if I've been trying to help you understand something you evidently didn't and you then take indirect jabs at me.
He has tried to make peace with you a few times but you will have none of it.This makes you look like a bully.
I have never met anyone on this forum in person that I know of and would never constantly challenge everyone I meet in person on their statements.
And whats up with the "HI folks.I love you all ,too."?Is this your attempt at humour?
I won't tolerate rude behavior in a man.By the way if you want to attack and target me ,go ahead I've got big shoulders and will easily handle anything you can dish out.
#3095
cams / ied testing
Everything came out pretty much normal, a few extra hp here and there.
#3096
Thanks for a great product.
#3097
Steve;
I think we are thinking the same thing, but talking from two different directions. Yes, the O2 sensor only measures the the free O2 in the exhaust. I am familiar with discussions about the level of oxygenation agents in the fuel and the variations that exist. But you are the first one I have ever hear mention a "14.2 Stoich" fuel. You aren't talking about the specific gravity of the fuel, are you?
Can you enlighten me to were I can find more documentation on this? Who is currently publishing research on this right now?
I think we are thinking the same thing, but talking from two different directions. Yes, the O2 sensor only measures the the free O2 in the exhaust. I am familiar with discussions about the level of oxygenation agents in the fuel and the variations that exist. But you are the first one I have ever hear mention a "14.2 Stoich" fuel. You aren't talking about the specific gravity of the fuel, are you?
Can you enlighten me to were I can find more documentation on this? Who is currently publishing research on this right now?
#3098
Steve, does this also have something to do with the new regulations allowing imported fuel coming in from Mexico. I found some information on this falling into this "14.2" area. I also understand this is expected to cause a lot of "detonation" issues on air cooled engines because of an expected RON of 87.
#3099
I wish it were only that but no it's already out there in the US. I'm trying to get a handle on all the changes coming and when they are coming but the simple fact is that some are already here. If you look at the pump in your area see what it says on it. Some will clearly show that they contain something other than gasoline alone. The level and what they contain seems to change around the US but the range of the fuel is going to suck event if the RON level is still 93. Out here in CA the best we can buy is RON 91 and most of it has 10% mix in it now. When you get out of the country the mix get event higher. Brazil uses a 25% mix most of the time and from what I hear it going higher in some places as oil prices climb. The mix is what's screwing with the fuel calibrations.
#3100
That post was by no means any form of an attack on anyone. I addressed it to cruiser because he's running those parts on his bike and I wanted him to be able to see how a base map for them differs from a stock base map. I figured that after a thousand words a picture might better illustrate the idea.
Yes, he has. At least since his latest attempt he has not subsequently (so far as I know; I haven't yet read anything after your post I'm responding to, yet) backhanded me while addressing someone else. Other than that particular, repeated action on his part I harbor no ill will towards him. This should be evident by my continually trying to help him understand this stuff. I guess if that makes me a bully then the definition of that word must have changed some time in the past several years and I'm behind the times.
Then you and I have some things in common. If I'm discussing something with someone and my information is different than theirs, I research further and discuss some more, wanting to be on the same page as them. Don't you do that?
Yeah. I'd been away from the site for a few days and upon my return saw several non-love comments about me.
If that's what you want I guess I could try; but can't promise you any satisfaction. All you have to do is take the first offensive maneuver to set things in motion. It's especially effective if I've been trying to help you understand something you evidently didn't and you then take indirect jabs at me.
Yes, he has. At least since his latest attempt he has not subsequently (so far as I know; I haven't yet read anything after your post I'm responding to, yet) backhanded me while addressing someone else. Other than that particular, repeated action on his part I harbor no ill will towards him. This should be evident by my continually trying to help him understand this stuff. I guess if that makes me a bully then the definition of that word must have changed some time in the past several years and I'm behind the times.
Then you and I have some things in common. If I'm discussing something with someone and my information is different than theirs, I research further and discuss some more, wanting to be on the same page as them. Don't you do that?
Yeah. I'd been away from the site for a few days and upon my return saw several non-love comments about me.
If that's what you want I guess I could try; but can't promise you any satisfaction. All you have to do is take the first offensive maneuver to set things in motion. It's especially effective if I've been trying to help you understand something you evidently didn't and you then take indirect jabs at me.