TC103 WILL NOT run on 91 octane without pinging all the time
#11
Remember one cubic foot of air is not the same amount of air at both sea level and 6000'. The more important thing is the amount of Oxygen in the air and it is reduced the higher you go. It's more a stack of small changes that occur as you travel higher that add up to get you into trouble along with the lower octane fuel. Now if your VE tables and everything else in your calibration were MAP based it would be much closer but that's not how HD has done it. Go back and get the fuel corrected first than work on the timing.
The areas where I'm getting knocking are within closed loop, so even if the VEs were off, the CLI and AFF are adjusting to keep the AFR at 14.3(0.976) which should be plenty rich. Besides, if you take a sea level tune and go to higher altitude, you would be running richer, not leaner. I will revisit my fuel tuning, but I think I've just explained why there's no way I'm running too lean. If anything I'm too rich.
#12
The following 2 users liked this post by marcodarq:
FLTRI17 (Yesterday),
paulmedford (Yesterday)
#13
I understand all of that but this EFI isn't mass airflow based, it's MAP based, with the exception of the VEs. Also the oxygen amount varies exactly with the change in air density, so that's already baked in.
The areas where I'm getting knocking are within closed loop, so even if the VEs were off, the CLI and AFF are adjusting to keep the AFR at 14.3(0.976) which should be plenty rich. Besides, if you take a sea level tune and go to higher altitude, you would be running richer, not leaner. I will revisit my fuel tuning, but I think I've just explained why there's no way I'm running too lean. If anything I'm too rich.
The areas where I'm getting knocking are within closed loop, so even if the VEs were off, the CLI and AFF are adjusting to keep the AFR at 14.3(0.976) which should be plenty rich. Besides, if you take a sea level tune and go to higher altitude, you would be running richer, not leaner. I will revisit my fuel tuning, but I think I've just explained why there's no way I'm running too lean. If anything I'm too rich.
#14
#15
Steve makes tuners for a living , listen to him. Get the fuel tables sorted and retard some ignition, unless you have excess carbon in the heads causing hot spots, .Also a thicker head gasket may help, and lastly use boostane to help fight knock. The closed loop section, is only reliable if the setup is correct, unless you are comparing it using and external AFR meter to verify. If it is accurate twiddle the timing
#16
#17
https://www.amazon.com/BOOSTane-Premium-Octane-Booster-Pack/dp/B01N5WPN0E/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?crid=18VO1PU6RQ05J&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.R-VL7wW9rALP9G6hW0kBy96foXSk1AAjVgCrdf3xmFlmupPPNqMuXfoPzGEmjyceVw1E7FYlsbdSqNO1qw-02VFuN2t-xKFAmYTBl0jzOvDtnEMPKBGvxzxshe8G5g81UAZWc5PZAumEPs_U0ElIcQZVP-LRE9pMm-Iq1YBniIJtwc5SauO5CkPEVradjgyHCxmMuEYvE-ro-qM02Gylf67OenMKuRvnAaw6GsWFQKMhYlhvyLiB2_TdnZxHBGJn8kIYBQCS9MljO52D3PtF4DGO1JNGCoC7kD0LHpubQds.zHmy3iThdL_-Z5UvXdoIyx9HdlOr6Df5jmqgsX-GW38&dib_tag=se&keywords=boostane&qid=1728090232&sprefix=boostane%2Caps%2C195&sr=8-1-spons&sp_csd=d2lkZ2V0TmFtZT1zcF9hdGY&psc=1
#18
It's not phantom knock because 1) I hear the knocking and 2) ion sensing doesn't "listen" for a sound, it detects it through ion buildup, caused by detonation.
#19
Look, obviously increasing the octane will make it go away...remember I came from using 93 and didn't have knocking issues. The 91 is the problem, not my tune or the altitude(which should have made it less of a problem.)
It's not phantom knock because 1) I hear the knocking and 2) ion sensing doesn't "listen" for a sound, it detects it through ion buildup, caused by detonation.
It's not phantom knock because 1) I hear the knocking and 2) ion sensing doesn't "listen" for a sound, it detects it through ion buildup, caused by detonation.
#20