PCIII mapping vs year model
#1
PCIII mapping vs year model
I am running the PCIII and had been using the map from Jamie that he made for my setup. Bike ran ok, temps good, mileage ave about 40. It was kinda flat though, no real excitement, but runs ok. I decided to take a look at map options on the Power Commander site today. I found one, map# 805-135 that looked close to my setup. Its for SuperTrapp mean mother pipes though....and Im running SE16ga, although they look a lot alike. Anyway, like I said, close to my setup. I loaded the map, and d@mn, this thing took off!!! Took about a 30 mile interstate ride....pulling like its on fire. Temps still running around 225/230, so that seems good. I did note a drop in mileage, but not a lot.
My question is, the map is for a different year model than my bike. Does anyone know, does that make a difference? The only thing closer IS for an 06 like mine but its for the stock ECM and Im running the stage 1.
Any advice is much appreciated.
My question is, the map is for a different year model than my bike. Does anyone know, does that make a difference? The only thing closer IS for an 06 like mine but its for the stock ECM and Im running the stage 1.
Any advice is much appreciated.
#2
RE: PCIII mapping vs year model
ORIGINAL: coolrays615
I am running the PCIII and had been using the map from Jamie that he made for my setup. Bike ran ok, temps good, mileage ave about 40. It was kinda flat though, no real excitement, but runs ok. I decided to take a look at map options on the Power Commander site today. I found one, map# 805-135 that looked close to my setup. Its for SuperTrapp mean mother pipes though....and Im running SE16ga, although they look a lot alike. Anyway, like I said, close to my setup. I loaded the map, and d@mn, this thing took off!!! Took about a 30 mile interstate ride....pulling like its on fire. Temps still running around 225/230, so that seems good. I did note a drop in mileage, but not a lot.
My question is, the map is for a different year model than my bike. Does anyone know, does that make a difference? The only thing closer IS for an 06 like mine but its for the stock ECM and Im running the stage 1.
I am running the PCIII and had been using the map from Jamie that he made for my setup. Bike ran ok, temps good, mileage ave about 40. It was kinda flat though, no real excitement, but runs ok. I decided to take a look at map options on the Power Commander site today. I found one, map# 805-135 that looked close to my setup. Its for SuperTrapp mean mother pipes though....and Im running SE16ga, although they look a lot alike. Anyway, like I said, close to my setup. I loaded the map, and d@mn, this thing took off!!! Took about a 30 mile interstate ride....pulling like its on fire. Temps still running around 225/230, so that seems good. I did note a drop in mileage, but not a lot.
My question is, the map is for a different year model than my bike. Does anyone know, does that make a difference? The only thing closer IS for an 06 like mine but its for the stock ECM and Im running the stage 1.
It'd be interesting to compare maps, so why not post a JPG of your first map. The second is available for downloading from PC, and appears to not have the accelerator-pump option enabled. Did the first?
#3
RE: PCIII mapping vs year model
Thanks iclick..........figured you would have a reply. I will post the map and you can take a look, have to download it from my laptop to my pc. I did tell Jamie about the stage 1 download when I ordered.
I dont think the mileage drop was much, but enough to notice. As for the temps...the oil temp was running about the same as it was with the map Jamie loaded. I was running the map from Jamie without the pump option, its installed now.
I will post the map and maybe you can tell me what you think.
Thanks again.
I dont think the mileage drop was much, but enough to notice. As for the temps...the oil temp was running about the same as it was with the map Jamie loaded. I was running the map from Jamie without the pump option, its installed now.
I will post the map and maybe you can tell me what you think.
Thanks again.
#4
RE: PCIII mapping vs year model
I always wondered the same thing. I sent Dynojet an email asking if there was any difference between an '02 and an '06 for mapping purposes and their reply was no. All of the '06 maps are for stock ECM's and mine has the stage 1 download. I too have been trying different maps with different pipes than what I have. Some give greater performance, but I lose MPG's. I am trying to find a "happy" medium. The only thing is that most of the maps require me to up the % in the 1st column to avoid the decel popping.
#5
RE: PCIII mapping vs year model
The map you received from the PC site (805-135) is much richer, especially at full-throttle, than the map provided by Fuel Moto (from your PM). I'm not sure why the bike runs better with the PC map, as Jamie's maps are based primarily on performance and cooling, not gas mileage, so I'm surprised his map isn't near optimum for your bike. Your Fuel Moto map looks similar to mine, and I find the performance of my SG excellent (for a stocker). It might be interesting to experiment and add some fuel to full throttle to see what it'd do for my bike.
If I were you I would put the values from 0-20% TP up to 3k RPM back to the Fuel Moto specs, then set 5-10% TP @ 2k-3k RPM to 1/3 of those original values. Do the same to 2-20% TP and 1k-2k RPM. All this will help with gas mileage but will add heat, so if you're running above about 210° while moving, and more than 230° in traffic, you might want to reconsider, or add an oil cooler (which you should do anyway). For me, all this is a balancing act between gas mileage and heat, and since I haven't messed with the values beyond 20% my performance isn't altered. Be careful leaning 20% and above, as if you go too far you will feel a flat spot. I wouldn't lean more than 2/3 the original values at 20% and would leave 40% and above alone.
I would say that if you are getting better full-throttle performance with the PC map, use it from 40% TP and above. You could then insert the Fuel Moto map from that point and below, and tweak it even further as mentioned above. Then you can have your cake and eat it too.
This has worked for me, but all bikes are different, so be sure to save your maps as you go, especially the original. Don't save over an older map (with the same filename) or you'll lose it.
If I were you I would put the values from 0-20% TP up to 3k RPM back to the Fuel Moto specs, then set 5-10% TP @ 2k-3k RPM to 1/3 of those original values. Do the same to 2-20% TP and 1k-2k RPM. All this will help with gas mileage but will add heat, so if you're running above about 210° while moving, and more than 230° in traffic, you might want to reconsider, or add an oil cooler (which you should do anyway). For me, all this is a balancing act between gas mileage and heat, and since I haven't messed with the values beyond 20% my performance isn't altered. Be careful leaning 20% and above, as if you go too far you will feel a flat spot. I wouldn't lean more than 2/3 the original values at 20% and would leave 40% and above alone.
I would say that if you are getting better full-throttle performance with the PC map, use it from 40% TP and above. You could then insert the Fuel Moto map from that point and below, and tweak it even further as mentioned above. Then you can have your cake and eat it too.
This has worked for me, but all bikes are different, so be sure to save your maps as you go, especially the original. Don't save over an older map (with the same filename) or you'll lose it.
#6
RE: PCIII mapping vs year model
ORIGINAL: ballgeier
I always wondered the same thing. I sent Dynojet an email asking if there was any difference between an '02 and an '06 for mapping purposes and their reply was no. All of the '06 maps are for stock ECM's and mine has the stage 1 download. I too have been trying different maps with different pipes than what I have. Some give greater performance, but I lose MPG's. I am trying to find a "happy" medium. The only thing is that most of the maps require me to up the % in the 1st column to avoid the decel popping.
I always wondered the same thing. I sent Dynojet an email asking if there was any difference between an '02 and an '06 for mapping purposes and their reply was no. All of the '06 maps are for stock ECM's and mine has the stage 1 download. I too have been trying different maps with different pipes than what I have. Some give greater performance, but I lose MPG's. I am trying to find a "happy" medium. The only thing is that most of the maps require me to up the % in the 1st column to avoid the decel popping.
#7
RE: PCIII mapping vs year model
"seal the muffler/pipe joint with anti-sieze or high-heat sealer (e.g., copper) and tighten well. Jamie at Fuel Moto says the decel popping is from air leaking into the muffler."
That is what I have been thinking, I looked at the connection of my mufflers, and on one side there was a "little" soot on the pipe. I tightened the clamp. Will putting anti-sieze on it make it smoke? I did put a little on the muffler clamp bolt, and it smoked next time it got hot.(of course, I did use the nickel bearing anti-sieze instead of the copper, but I just bought a can of the copper for my work truck)
That is what I have been thinking, I looked at the connection of my mufflers, and on one side there was a "little" soot on the pipe. I tightened the clamp. Will putting anti-sieze on it make it smoke? I did put a little on the muffler clamp bolt, and it smoked next time it got hot.(of course, I did use the nickel bearing anti-sieze instead of the copper, but I just bought a can of the copper for my work truck)
Trending Topics
#8
RE: PCIII mapping vs year model
iclick,
Been reading all the posts I can on the EFI options out there and decided on the PCIII. Place my order yesterday with fuel moto.
Once installed, bike will have Rush 2" slip-ons, K&N, and the PCIII. Looking at going true dual in the near future with one of the limited options that include both O2 sensor bungs to enable a return to stock config should I need to.
Anyway, Jamie will be loading a map based on the above setup. What I was wondering was if you could use the email reply option and send me your base/original map and your current one. Not that I want to use it but rather I want to see how you have tweaked it if at all to further my present limited understanding of the unit in actual operation.
Appreciate your time.
LeeFLHX
Been reading all the posts I can on the EFI options out there and decided on the PCIII. Place my order yesterday with fuel moto.
Once installed, bike will have Rush 2" slip-ons, K&N, and the PCIII. Looking at going true dual in the near future with one of the limited options that include both O2 sensor bungs to enable a return to stock config should I need to.
Anyway, Jamie will be loading a map based on the above setup. What I was wondering was if you could use the email reply option and send me your base/original map and your current one. Not that I want to use it but rather I want to see how you have tweaked it if at all to further my present limited understanding of the unit in actual operation.
Appreciate your time.
LeeFLHX
#9
#10
RE: PCIII mapping vs year model
ORIGINAL: LeeFLHX
iclick,
Been reading all the posts I can on the EFI options out there and decided on the PCIII. Place my order yesterday with fuel moto.
Once installed, bike will have Rush 2" slip-ons, K&N, and the PCIII. Looking at going true dual in the near future with one of the limited options that include both O2 sensor bungs to enable a return to stock config should I need to.
Anyway, Jamie will be loading a map based on the above setup. What I was wondering was if you could use the email reply option and send me your base/original map and your current one. Not that I want to use it but rather I want to see how you have tweaked it if at all to further my present limited understanding of the unit in actual operation.
iclick,
Been reading all the posts I can on the EFI options out there and decided on the PCIII. Place my order yesterday with fuel moto.
Once installed, bike will have Rush 2" slip-ons, K&N, and the PCIII. Looking at going true dual in the near future with one of the limited options that include both O2 sensor bungs to enable a return to stock config should I need to.
Anyway, Jamie will be loading a map based on the above setup. What I was wondering was if you could use the email reply option and send me your base/original map and your current one. Not that I want to use it but rather I want to see how you have tweaked it if at all to further my present limited understanding of the unit in actual operation.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post