Thats funny. They didn't do it yet. The copy kept failing.

 

Well if it was done then I dont notice a big difference in lag of loading everytime a link is clicked or thread.

They should ditch ASP/Mircosoft... try apache/PHP and a good database server

Half the links to sponcers don't work.. more than half.. keeps comming up with:


Server Error in '/' Application.
[hr]

String or binary data would be truncated. The statement has been terminated.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: String or binary data would be truncated. The statement has been terminated.

Source Error:





Line 61: objCommand = NEW SQLCommand(usql, objConn)
Line 62: objConn.Open()
Line 63: intID =objCommand.ExecuteScalar()
Line 64: objConn.Close() : objCommand.dispose() : objConn.Dispose()
Line 65:
Source File: E:\Sites\WWW\AutoForumUniverse.com\ads\Redirect.as px Line: 63

Stack Trace:





[SqlException: String or binary data would be truncated.
The statement has been terminated.]
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteReader(Com mandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream) +742
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteScalar() +178
ASP.redirect_aspx.__Render__control1(HtmlTextWrite r __output, Control parameterContainer) in E:\Sites\WWW\AutoForumUniverse.com\ads\Redirect.as px:63
System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildren(HtmlTextWrite r writer) +27
System.Web.UI.Control.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +7
System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) +243
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain() +1926


[hr]

Version Information:Microsoft .NET Framework Version:1.1.4322.2300; ASP.NET Version:1.1.4322.2300

 

Myfirst computer was a Commodore 128 with a 1200 baud modem. I remember spending hours and hours dialed into Quantam Link*.

* Later renamed to "America Online"

 

I had the commodore 64 first and my 386 only had 4 meg of ram. But i was cruising, so i thought in those days.

 

Thanks too...

 

I was in 8th grade when we had Radio Shack TRS 80 computers, with cassette tape for loading programs....Green screen.

Friend of mine had a commodore Vic-20 (5K Ram)

Brother had a Commodore 64.

Used to Have an Apple IIe with an amber monitor....was really a neat little computer! Kind of wish I had her now!

Currently on a "turd"...a $500 Wal-Mart computer....an H/P 133 MHz, 128 RAM, computer which I am currently using...all I do is e-mail and surf, works for me!

Joe

 

And to think that I got chastised for my rather directcomments regarding this problem. Probably won't get any apologies from the MOD SQUAD, but have some gratification in knowing I was right...it wasn't my computer after all....

 

Not sure what your referring to but you have never been chastised by this MOD. I have suffered right along with the rest of you. The fact is the servers have not been changed because of the copy failures and other technical difficulties. They are gonna try again shortly and hopefully with a better outcome.

As far as the forum speeding up can't tell you what was done one way or another. To our understanding nothing could be done until the server change took place. If you have increased speed/performance thank your lucky stars.

 

Apologize for what Billk? Took some time to research your past posts and here’s what I found in regards the site slowness issues.

In this thread:
https://www.hdforums.com/m_1361472/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm

You posted the following:

What you don't seem to realize is, we're regular posters like you...we're not paid, we do this volunteer-wise...we don't work for HDForums in any type of capacity than we volunteered to try and make this place as great as it is.

Still confused as to what we should be apologizing for.

 

Drop the ASP and move to SMF using MySQL = problem solved