General Harley Davidson Chat Forum to discuss general Harley Davidson issues, topics, and experiences.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

question to the H-D historians, Knuck to Pan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-10-2014, 10:45 AM
Proteus's Avatar
Proteus
Proteus is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,167
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default question to the H-D historians, Knuck to Pan

Hi Guys,

I'm quite confused right now.

We all know the Panhead came up in 1948 and the flatheaded UL disappeared fromt the lineup that same year

I recently bought a second hand book about Harley-Davidson, wherein is written that the Pan indeed showed up in 1948, but there is a 1000cc ( 61ci) EL still in production till 1952.

Am I wrong by assuming that the Knucklehead has been produced till 1952, or was the Panhead available in two different displacements (61 & 74ci?)

production numbers (from that book) for the EL are:

1948: 4321 (+ 198 ES with lower compression engines)
1949: 3419 (they even speak about EL, ES, EP and ELP??)
1950: 2046
1951: 1532
1952: 918

while production numbers for the 1200cc FL (Panhead)

1948: 8071 (+ 334 FS)
1949: 8014 (+ 486 FLP & 490 FS)
1950: 7407 (+ 544 FS)
1951: 6560 (+ 135 FS)
1952: 5554 (+ 186 FLS suited for side car).

Am I becoming nuts, or is this book waay wrong?

Thanks for chiming in...
 
  #2  
Old 02-10-2014, 10:58 AM
Loc_Tite's Avatar
Loc_Tite
Loc_Tite is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

The Panhead was available in 2 displacement sizes briefly, but the smaller motor was discontinued.
 
  #3  
Old 02-10-2014, 11:00 AM
wuzfuz's Avatar
wuzfuz
wuzfuz is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Pan or Knuckle EL=61 CU. IN.
FL=74 CU. IN.
wuzfuz
 
  #4  
Old 02-10-2014, 11:16 AM
Proteus's Avatar
Proteus
Proteus is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,167
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Ok, from 1948 on, Pan available in 61 and 74ci, got it!

Many thanks!
 
  #5  
Old 02-10-2014, 11:25 AM
Loc_Tite's Avatar
Loc_Tite
Loc_Tite is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

61 ci pan was phased out in 1953. Funny this came up I was just reading about that this morning.
 
  #6  
Old 02-10-2014, 11:54 AM
Proteus's Avatar
Proteus
Proteus is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,167
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Loc_Tite
61 ci pan was phased out in 1953. Funny this came up I was just reading about that this morning.
This is a small world, hehe

By the way, not so long go, I also was suprised to see a 45" from 1949, with a hydraglide fender on a springer fork:




I guess i'll learn each day...
 

Last edited by Proteus; 02-10-2014 at 12:03 PM.
  #7  
Old 02-10-2014, 12:50 PM
Sling Blade 14's Avatar
Sling Blade 14
Sling Blade 14 is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Puget Sound, WA.
Posts: 11,167
Received 1,791 Likes on 932 Posts
Default

H-D had a tendency to use up the lower cases into a new model year- this continued up to 1984 using Shovel lower ends.

The 61 cid was marketed to city police departments and utilities for around town use.
 
  #8  
Old 02-10-2014, 03:26 PM
Proteus's Avatar
Proteus
Proteus is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,167
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sling Blade NSAA
H-D had a tendency to use up the lower cases into a new model year- this continued up to 1984 using Shovel lower ends.

The 61 cid was marketed to city police departments and utilities for around town use.
You mean the early shovels still had the Panhead lower cases, as the Evo's kept the cone late shovels lower cases?

This is what I like at H-D, there is no revolution, just evolution. Each time they did it differently, there appeared some flaws or failures in the design (1936 Knuck oil and valves springs troubles, for instance, the first WL's also had their problems, it seems).

I'm a history nerd, any history, and I really enjoy H-D history. I never saw here someone mention Bill harley's son taking over the engineering business at H-D during the 1940's...
 
  #9  
Old 02-11-2014, 08:33 AM
streetrods's Avatar
streetrods
streetrods is offline
Stage III
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

one thing to remember about H-D history is nothing is etched in stone
have been fooled more than once.Piece of panhead trivia,while hydraulic
front end offered in 49 sidecar models came equipped with springer because
of increased trail helped handling.First hydraulic lifter introduced in 51 built into
bottom of pushrod did not work worth a damm,still have them in a box upstairs.
 
  #10  
Old 02-11-2014, 10:04 AM
panz4ever's Avatar
panz4ever
panz4ever is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Klaus County, Cali
Posts: 7,328
Received 3,342 Likes on 1,518 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Proteus
Hi Guys,

I'm quite confused right now.

We all know the Panhead came up in 1948 and the flatheaded UL disappeared fromt the lineup that same year

I recently bought a second hand book about Harley-Davidson, wherein is written that the Pan indeed showed up in 1948, but there is a 1000cc ( 61ci) EL still in production till 1952.

Am I wrong by assuming that the Knucklehead has been produced till 1952, or was the Panhead available in two different displacements (61 & 74ci?)

production numbers (from that book) for the EL are:

1948: 4321 (+ 198 ES with lower compression engines)
1949: 3419 (they even speak about EL, ES, EP and ELP??)
1950: 2046
1951: 1532
1952: 918

while production numbers for the 1200cc FL (Panhead)

1948: 8071 (+ 334 FS)
1949: 8014 (+ 486 FLP & 490 FS)
1950: 7407 (+ 544 FS)
1951: 6560 (+ 135 FS)
1952: 5554 (+ 186 FLS suited for side car).

Am I becoming nuts, or is this book waay wrong?

Thanks for chiming in...
You are correct that the UL series ceased production with the 1948 modles; however flatheads in 45 model series continues until 1973 primarily utilized as the servicar (G models)

For 1948 Panhead models:

48 EL 61 OHV - Special Solo Sport (7:1 compression)
48 E 61 OHV - Medium compression (6.5:1 compression)
48 ES 61 OHV - Sidecar gearing with medium compression (6.5:1 compression)
48 FL 74 OHV - Special Solo Sport (7:1 compression)
48 F 74 OHV - Medium compression (6.6:1 compression)
48 FS 74 OHV - Sidecar gearing with medium compression (6.6:1 compression)

E/EL motors were basically 1000 cc motors; F/FL motors werte basically 1200 cc motors.

In addition MoCo also utilized "Equipment Groups". There was a basic standard package that the models came with and additional packages which offered more. These were categorzied as the Sport Solo Group, the Deluxe Solo Group, The Standard Police Group, the Utility Group, and the Deluxe Sport Sidecar Group. There was also first and last year features (most notably the last year for the UL series) as well as 1948 only features.

The same configuration of pans followed in 1949 models as did equipment groups, first and last year items as well as 1949 only features. Now throw in fit and fitment and finish changes (even down to plating of parts), add in paint schemes and colors and you can see that MoCo has been doing this a very long time and that it continues into today.

Just to add...yes HD quit producing the E series pans in 52. In 1949 MoCo again produced two basic versions of the pan, high compression (EL/FL) and low compression (F/L) although MoCo designated the models as "medium compression". Hydra glide forks were standard on all F/FL, E/EL models but spring forks were available by special order for sidecar-quipped bikes (although springer equipped models were available even without the sidecar). All bikes so equipped were designated EP, ELP, FLP, depending on which motor was fitted.

in 1949 sidecar gearing was also available for both chassis and bikes were designated as ES, ELS, EPS, FLPS, FS, FLS, FLPS, depending on the motor and front end. However....I have only seen the "S" stamped on one set of cases and that was a 48 model and not a 49 model. Common belief in some circles is that the "S" was not stamped on the motor as part of the serial number and that the "P" somtimes was, BUT it was stamped at the end of the number.

So while the numbers produced for each modle year might be interesting, it would be very difficult o know for certainty that one possessed any other than an E/EL, F/FL model unless there was documentation in the form of an original sales invoice from the factory attached to an original, unmolested machine it would be difficult to show it was in fact somethiong other than an E/EL, F/FL with whatever equipment group avialable for the year model. There are a few out there and going to some AMCA swap meets I have see a few original condition bikes but the numbers get fewer by the day.
 

Last edited by panz4ever; 02-11-2014 at 10:32 AM.


Quick Reply: question to the H-D historians, Knuck to Pan



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 PM.