Why must Harleys set so low
#1
Why must Harleys set so low
There isn't one model I've ever sat on where my legs are even remotely extended at a stop and I'm only 6'1. My old rice burners sat much higher and rode way better. It just seems HD targets shorter people in there bike design. I even read a lot of posts where people want them even lower. Has anybody ever raised their suspension?
#2
Well in this world things are designed for the average man. And since you are a bit taller than avg you will have that problem. I added forward control extensions to help stretch my legs out some. Most men being around 5'9" they would not be able to touch ground if bike was as low.
#3
Funny. I'm 5 10 and it has been a long time prior to my RK that I was on my toes, or at least the ***** of my feet.
I for one like the low setting of the frame. So much so I am putting progressive 944 to drop it another inch.
I for one like the low setting of the frame. So much so I am putting progressive 944 to drop it another inch.
#6
This question baffles me to be honest. We are talking about very different machines. A Harley is a cruising bike. It's low and comfortable. Sport bike, sport touring, touring, standard etc are designed for more aggressive riding, and sit higher to allow for steeper lean angles. None if it has a single thing to do with how tall the rider is. If you so desperately need to stand up and have straight legs then change bikes, because a cruiser is not for you.
#7
Unless you install an "adjustable" seat (e.g. cage front seats) there's only so much a designer can incorporate into bike ergonomics to hit the "average" Joe. I'd say HD, or any bike manufacturer, hits the 85-90% mark with their bike-to-rider sizing.
Trending Topics
#9
When I first took a ride on a low cruiser type bike it was a Suzuki Intruder. I had a sport bike at the time. The low seat height and forward controls felt totally wrong to me. I eventually moved from sport bikes to jap cruisers then onto Harleys. My RK fits me like a glove, I love everything about it. Fast forward about 25 years since I first took that Intruder for a ride, A few years ago I bought some bikes just for the purpose of reselling them. One completely restored GPZ 750 and two non running GPZ 750's All for $1,000. Before putting them up for sale I rode the restored one around for about an hour. I was actually laughing to myself. I couldn't believe I used to think that was a good "riding position". One hour and I couldn't wait to get off the thing.
But that's just me. I also know of a group of guys in their late 60's and early 70's who show up at a restaurant in Ringoes NJ who still ride sport bikes.
But that's just me. I also know of a group of guys in their late 60's and early 70's who show up at a restaurant in Ringoes NJ who still ride sport bikes.
#10
op seems to contradict my experience.
I don't know how many bikes you have 'sat' on. I see you ride a sporty that is a small bike for someone over 6', ever think about stepping up (contrary to your sig line)?
A friend whom is about 5'9" has to tippy toe his uc around, while I, at 6'o2" can pretty much flat-foot it and my rk. It's a little lower now I have a corbin seat. My biggest concern is foot position when riding, the corbin helped as did removing the heal shift arm (that I'd like back). I'll be investigating forward controls and/or extended foot/floor boards.
I don't know how many bikes you have 'sat' on. I see you ride a sporty that is a small bike for someone over 6', ever think about stepping up (contrary to your sig line)?
A friend whom is about 5'9" has to tippy toe his uc around, while I, at 6'o2" can pretty much flat-foot it and my rk. It's a little lower now I have a corbin seat. My biggest concern is foot position when riding, the corbin helped as did removing the heal shift arm (that I'd like back). I'll be investigating forward controls and/or extended foot/floor boards.