Billy Lane
#11
RE: Billy Lane
ORIGINAL: khollister
Perhaps you missed the comment that Billy should be prosecuted for what he did? I just find it interesting that while the press is quick to point out that a biker"was not wearing a helmet" whensome idiot runs him down, they didn't avail themselves of this opportunity to muddy the waters. It is possible the accident would have had a different outcome if the victim wasn't also impaired and might have taken some evasive action. In either case, Billy screwed up.
Perhaps you missed the comment that Billy should be prosecuted for what he did? I just find it interesting that while the press is quick to point out that a biker"was not wearing a helmet" whensome idiot runs him down, they didn't avail themselves of this opportunity to muddy the waters. It is possible the accident would have had a different outcome if the victim wasn't also impaired and might have taken some evasive action. In either case, Billy screwed up.
#12
RE: Billy Lane
I think he should fry. Not only was he driving drunk, but he hit and killed a fellow biker. I watched him on the Biker Build Off shows a couple of times, and I never cared much for him as a builder or a person. One time on the show his bike wouldnt run and the next time his bike caught fire and burned down on the side of the rode.
#13
RE: Billy Lane
Whether or not the victim was intoxicated is irrelevant to a criminal prosecution. It may, however, be relevant in the civil action. I suspect the prosecutor dropped the DUI with serious bodily injury because it is a lesser included offense of the more serious charge. Some prosecutors file on everything from littering on up to the most serious charges they think the evidence will support, then discard the lesser charges once they know the strength of their evidence. If they do not drop the lesser charges, it is conceivable that, at arraignment, Lane could plead guilty to the lesser charge and foreclose the prosecution of the more serious charge because jeopardy has attached.
Suffice to say that it sounds like the prosecutor knows what he is doing. If the prosecutor is dropping the lesser charges and keeping the serious charge, I suspect that Lane is toast -- this one's going to trial.
<><Peace
Suffice to say that it sounds like the prosecutor knows what he is doing. If the prosecutor is dropping the lesser charges and keeping the serious charge, I suspect that Lane is toast -- this one's going to trial.
<><Peace
#16
RE: Billy Lane
I would agree w/dadofsix. The other charges are most likely lesser included offenses in Florida. If you think about great bodily injury could mean anything up to and including death, whereas manslaughter means someone has died.
Let's hope he gets what he deserves and does not skate due to a sympathetic jury.
Let's hope he gets what he deserves and does not skate due to a sympathetic jury.
#17
RE: Billy Lane
ORIGINAL: khollister
They dropped the suspended license charge because he was recently found not guilty on the previous DUI charge in NC or wherever.
They dropped the suspended license charge because he was recently found not guilty on the previous DUI charge in NC or wherever.
Kevin
#18
RE: Billy Lane
You make good rational points khollister and I tend to agree with you.
WillieC
WillieC
ORIGINAL: khollister
Perhaps you missed the comment that Billy should be prosecuted for what he did? I just find it interesting that while the press is quick to point out that a biker"was not wearing a helmet" whensome idiot runs him down, they didn't avail themselves of this opportunity to muddy the waters. It is possible the accident would have had a different outcome if the victim wasn't also impaired and might have taken some evasive action. In either case, Billy screwed up.
Perhaps you missed the comment that Billy should be prosecuted for what he did? I just find it interesting that while the press is quick to point out that a biker"was not wearing a helmet" whensome idiot runs him down, they didn't avail themselves of this opportunity to muddy the waters. It is possible the accident would have had a different outcome if the victim wasn't also impaired and might have taken some evasive action. In either case, Billy screwed up.
#20
RE: Billy Lane
ORIGINAL: boe1971200
Not only was he driving drunk, but he hit and killed a fellow biker.
Not only was he driving drunk, but he hit and killed a fellow biker.
Now then, in a forum filled with infighting, lines drawn, judgments of lifestyle, disagreement on who's what, and the like,it seems rather unfortunateit takes a motorcyclist GETTING KILLED for folks to 'come together' as one?The comment of 'fellow biker' was made as it related to the fallen victim. Chances are, that same 'fellow biker' (hadhe posted here on the boards) could very well have been met with anymosity, judgements, called to prove his mettle at every turn, etc etc. But he'sregarded as a 'fellow biker' now that he's dead?Why is that? He may not have been 'good enough for some of you folks' when he was alive (if any of the posts on these boards are any indication).But now that he's gone, he was a 'fellow biker?' It's almost insulting that some of those very people who would more than likely slam the guy in life, now call him one of their own in death. Again, hopefully folks can see what point I am trying to make, digest the statement for a moment, and come to terms with the fact that if we're ultimately our own worse enemy (infighting, board bullshit), then what good are we to on another out there on the often times dangerous roadways?
Again, and not to be misinterpreted, my regards go out to the fallen victims family and loved ones.