The Poor Harley Switchback...
#11
05-21-2013 | 10:19 AM
Cruiser
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 123
Likes: 24
From: Alberta
I don't see many around here, kinda don't think it'll be in the lineup very long. I think they've tried several dynas set up a little more touring friendly over the years, dyna convertible, super glide t sport, now the switchback. Never have seen many of any of them around here, they don't seem to sell as well as the street bobs. If I was smaller I'd have taken a better look at a switchback before picking up the street glide, but I tend to like bikes a little larger.
#12
05-21-2013 | 10:22 AM
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 12,359
Likes: 73
From: WI
I really like the concept. The front fender and wheel look great and Dynas are fantastically fun bikes. But what always got me was the price - literally for a few bucks more, you get a "full size" touring bike.
I seriously considered the Switchback but the price, smaller bags, and about 2" shorter than a touring model pointed me towards the RK more.
Now that being said, I believe the market for the Switchback is likely towards a solo rider who doesn't need large bags nor the air suspension, etc. But that market is rather limited.
I seriously considered the Switchback but the price, smaller bags, and about 2" shorter than a touring model pointed me towards the RK more.
Now that being said, I believe the market for the Switchback is likely towards a solo rider who doesn't need large bags nor the air suspension, etc. But that market is rather limited.
#14
05-21-2013 | 10:49 AM
Thread Starter
|
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 348
From: Ione, CA
#15
05-21-2013 | 12:44 PM
Advanced
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 5
From: Des Moines, Iowa
Thought I would post a pic so you could see possibilities of the switchback. I have had mine 7 months now and love it. It is quick, lite, and rides great. Plus it can be stripped down in a minute for a in town cruiser. I know its not for everyone but best fit for me right now.
Last edited by Brian73; 05-21-2013 at 12:49 PM.
The following users liked this post:
todd493 (05-10-2016)
#17
05-21-2013 | 01:19 PM
Intermediate
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Bonneau SC
#18
05-21-2013 | 01:25 PM
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,032
Likes: 4,462
From: Sandpoint, Idaho
Those that call it a girls bike are usually riding pigs themselves. (on and off their bikes)
#19
05-21-2013 | 01:27 PM
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 126
From: Coastal Carolina
Good point. The Switchback starts at $16,200 and the Road King Standard (which it essentially copies) starts at $17,600, only $1400 more. I have always thought the same about the Heritage Softail (starting at $17,600) vs. the Road King Classic (at $19,900) although there are more obvious style differences between the RKC and HSC than there are between the Switchback and the RK.
#20
05-21-2013 | 01:32 PM
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 961
From: Brandon,Fl
I was at Sac Harley the other day and they had a bunch of bikes in, including many Japanese trade-ins. Walking the aisles and looking at the offerings I came to the three Switchbacks. One was a dark red, one a dark blue and the last black. They were shoved together with some Sportsters and a few Dynas, far from the touring bikes and Softails. They looked like a complete afterthought, unloved and unwanted.
Looking at them, they are very similar in size and layout to a classic Harley from the mid-fifties to the end of the panhead era. The bags even open like Electraglides from back then. With the 103" engine this bike should be considerably quicker than any other bagger in the room. The exposed shocks look right as opposed to a Softail or the plastic covered touring bikes. This could be a great bike.
But here's the problem(s): The colors are awful, bikes look like clothing the Amish wear, dark, flat and drab. The wheels are even worse, possibly the ugliest wheels on any bike, let alone a Harley. The bags are too small by 20 percent and the side latch-looking things are too large; the whole mess looks like a trash bin.
And the name? Sorry but it sounds so gay. Switchback??? You mean like that Brokeback Mountain movie about the queer cowboys? Switchwhat? Back what?
So the bikes sit there. Haven't seen one sell in two months which is a shame because with a decent name, some good colors, maybe spoke or at least well-designed wheels this bike should be a hit with people who want a quick bagger for weekend rides or guys who for whatever reason don't need an 850+ lb. touring bike.
Wake up Harley...
Looking at them, they are very similar in size and layout to a classic Harley from the mid-fifties to the end of the panhead era. The bags even open like Electraglides from back then. With the 103" engine this bike should be considerably quicker than any other bagger in the room. The exposed shocks look right as opposed to a Softail or the plastic covered touring bikes. This could be a great bike.
But here's the problem(s): The colors are awful, bikes look like clothing the Amish wear, dark, flat and drab. The wheels are even worse, possibly the ugliest wheels on any bike, let alone a Harley. The bags are too small by 20 percent and the side latch-looking things are too large; the whole mess looks like a trash bin.
And the name? Sorry but it sounds so gay. Switchback??? You mean like that Brokeback Mountain movie about the queer cowboys? Switchwhat? Back what?
So the bikes sit there. Haven't seen one sell in two months which is a shame because with a decent name, some good colors, maybe spoke or at least well-designed wheels this bike should be a hit with people who want a quick bagger for weekend rides or guys who for whatever reason don't need an 850+ lb. touring bike.
Wake up Harley...
The following 5 users liked this post by Hammerhead Pat:
bradn (06-27-2019),
CaffeineBuzz (08-05-2019),
Norcalsvt (07-07-2019),
RDFDJD (06-30-2019),
Vec (07-09-2019)