General Harley Davidson Chat Forum to discuss general Harley Davidson issues, topics, and experiences.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Will new cam hurt MPG?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 09-25-2010, 02:13 PM
oldairboater's Avatar
oldairboater
oldairboater is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 7,476
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

New cam most likely will decrease your mileage. My 03 Heritage 88 ci gets 34-39 mpg on a good day but my stock 98 wideglide 80 ci with carb gets only 36-39 mpg. Mine dropped an average of four miles to the gallon but I have my bikes all tuned rich. The 88 twin cam was tuned rich before the new cams. I don't recommend running an air cooled engine lean.
 
  #12  
Old 09-25-2010, 05:49 PM
1931jamesw's Avatar
1931jamesw
1931jamesw is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by harleyriv
Was that the only engine mod?.....
I had an SE air cleaner and thunderheader and SEPST with dyno tune. I added the 255 cams and had it retuned by the same guy and ended up with better fuel mileage.
 
  #13  
Old 09-25-2010, 05:52 PM
edilgdaor's Avatar
edilgdaor
edilgdaor is offline
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 13,803
Received 6,611 Likes on 3,880 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1931jamesw
I have a 96". I added 255 cams and actually increased my fuel mileage over the stage 1 I had before putting the cams in.
I was kinda thinking that if the engine made more power, you wouldn't have to open the throttle as much, which could contribute to using less fuel. It may somewhat offset the extra fuel that the increased airflow resulting from more valve opening could cause.
 
  #14  
Old 09-25-2010, 06:02 PM
1931jamesw's Avatar
1931jamesw
1931jamesw is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by edilgdaor
I was kinda thinking that if the engine made more power, you wouldn't have to open the throttle as much, which could contribute to using less fuel. It may somewhat offset the extra fuel that the increased airflow resulting from more valve opening could cause.
That can be the case if you dont ride more aggresively than you did with the original setup.
 
  #15  
Old 09-25-2010, 10:29 PM
seniorsuperglideE8's Avatar
seniorsuperglideE8
seniorsuperglideE8 is offline
Supporter
Veteran: Navy
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: along the shore of Mishigami
Posts: 15,718
Received 4,770 Likes on 2,533 Posts
Default

The set up with my 02 FXD is a 95" kit and SE 203 cams for low and midrange torque. I realize you are just asking about cams only. Our mileage is close to 48 on the open road holding steady speed, two up riding. Around traffic including traffic lights it will fall to high 30's to low 40's. Depends on how the throttle is being twisted and how hard. The cams would typically allow more charge and more complete burning, maximizing the fuel burn efficiency in the chamber. If your have the funds do the 95" kit in concert with cams, you'll be surprised.
 
  #16  
Old 09-25-2010, 11:04 PM
Intrepid175's Avatar
Intrepid175
Intrepid175 is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas City, TX
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by edilgdaor
I was kinda thinking that if the engine made more power, you wouldn't have to open the throttle as much, which could contribute to using less fuel. It may somewhat offset the extra fuel that the increased airflow resulting from more valve opening could cause.
I would think that if the new cam timing makes the engine more efficient within the rpm range you generally ride it at, then yes, you'll see some improvement in fuel economy, assuming you don't make too much use of the extra torque/hp.

What I think most don't like to admit is, regardless of the engine build, the rider is still the biggest factor in what kind of fuel economy you're going to get. It's pretty much up to you!

Ride Safe,
Steve R.
 
  #17  
Old 09-25-2010, 11:44 PM
justanotherjim's Avatar
justanotherjim
justanotherjim is offline
Road Master

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: kingman AZ. We aren't in hell, but you can see it from here!!!
Posts: 1,157
Received 62 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

I did a 95" and S&S 510 cams and saw a significant drop in mileage. I will admit I had a very heavy right wrist at first, but even after the newness wore off and getting back to the daily drive was routine the gas mileage did not improve. I have had nothing but problems, with carb and ignition timing etc.. I had to take my ride to a different shop because the first shop couldn't get the corrections made.
 
  #18  
Old 09-26-2010, 07:55 AM
Kims toy's Avatar
Kims toy
Kims toy is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: S.W. Ontario
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just to add my $0.02!
After my build, see sig, my mileage went up 10%.
Before, 42-46 mpg,(Can.)
After, 48-52 mpg
That's all 2-up.
Added bonus.....
Just twist the throttle!!!!!!
 
  #19  
Old 09-26-2010, 11:24 AM
magnum629c's Avatar
magnum629c
magnum629c is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: redbank new Jersey
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

with just a cam alone it will not drop that much at all...........If it even drops at all
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mike
Touring Models
29
12-02-2017 04:30 PM
skjskmata
Softail Models
16
09-19-2011 09:03 PM
rbartick
Motorcycles For Sale
1
09-27-2010 04:50 PM
JockWhisky
Exhaust System Topics
10
03-18-2009 10:31 PM
jnickel
Exhaust System Topics
9
04-10-2007 08:32 PM



Quick Reply: Will new cam hurt MPG?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 PM.