Sobriety Checkpoints
#21
07-23-2009 | 09:41 AM
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,975
Likes: 11
From: NJ
I hear ya. My best friend was killed two years ago by a dumbass makin an illegal u-turn right in front of him. The dumbass wasn't drunk, and they just slapped him on the wrist. So, what we have is a guy that can't even drive responsibly sober...but hey, that's no concern...right? 'Least he wasn't drinkin...was "just an accident". My ****! The guy did sumthin illegal, and caused my bud's death. Ain't that the same thing? I mean, it's illegal to drive drunk...and, they throw the book at that offense. Why isn't the other illegal act punished? It'd be ok if it were the dumbasses that got killed in these wrecks...but, it's too often the other guy, and the dumbass is free to do it all over again. Sometimes I think I'm gonna go postal if I hear "It was just an accident" one more time.
As for the check points...technically speakin, I think they violate the "probable cause", "reasonable suspiscion", or whatever it's called clause. To me, it's like pickin a street, and then goin door to door demandin to interview private citizens and search their homes, regardless of whether they've done anything to provoke such an act. How many of us would tolerate that? And, before anyone gives me the "drivin is a privilege" horse hockey...so is ownin a home.
As for the check points...technically speakin, I think they violate the "probable cause", "reasonable suspiscion", or whatever it's called clause. To me, it's like pickin a street, and then goin door to door demandin to interview private citizens and search their homes, regardless of whether they've done anything to provoke such an act. How many of us would tolerate that? And, before anyone gives me the "drivin is a privilege" horse hockey...so is ownin a home.
Don't agree with your analogy of going door to door and searching houses. Going through a properly conducted sobriety checkpoint isn't much more of a privacy invasion than going through a toll booth. The officer develops his reasonable suspicion in about 15 seconds while talking to you............. just about how long it would take the wife to tell you've had too much to drink.
The following users liked this post:
DuciDay (03-25-2024)
#22
07-23-2009 | 10:18 AM
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 15
From: Norfolk, VA
The following users liked this post:
DuciDay (03-25-2024)
#23
07-23-2009 | 10:37 AM
Road Captain
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 647
Likes: 4
From: Snohomish WA
I hear ya. My best friend was killed two years ago by a dumbass makin an illegal u-turn right in front of him. The dumbass wasn't drunk, and they just slapped him on the wrist. So, what we have is a guy that can't even drive responsibly sober...but hey, that's no concern...right? 'Least he wasn't drinkin...was "just an accident". My ****! The guy did sumthin illegal, and caused my bud's death. Ain't that the same thing? I mean, it's illegal to drive drunk...and, they throw the book at that offense. Why isn't the other illegal act punished? It'd be ok if it were the dumbasses that got killed in these wrecks...but, it's too often the other guy, and the dumbass is free to do it all over again. Sometimes I think I'm gonna go postal if I hear "It was just an accident" one more time.
As for the check points...technically speakin, I think they violate the "probable cause", "reasonable suspiscion", or whatever it's called clause. To me, it's like pickin a street, and then goin door to door demandin to interview private citizens and search their homes, regardless of whether they've done anything to provoke such an act. How many of us would tolerate that? And, before anyone gives me the "drivin is a privilege" horse hockey...so is ownin a home.
As for the check points...technically speakin, I think they violate the "probable cause", "reasonable suspiscion", or whatever it's called clause. To me, it's like pickin a street, and then goin door to door demandin to interview private citizens and search their homes, regardless of whether they've done anything to provoke such an act. How many of us would tolerate that? And, before anyone gives me the "drivin is a privilege" horse hockey...so is ownin a home.
So excuse me but I am willing to give up some rights so this doesn't happen to anyone else. What about my brothers and nephews rights and my sister inlaw who lost both a husband and a son. I have no tolerance for people who drink and drive I guess it has to hit home to feel this way but it was NO Accident.
Last edited by skydrifter; 07-23-2009 at 11:08 AM.
The following users liked this post:
DuciDay (03-25-2024)
#24
07-23-2009 | 10:39 AM
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 17,623
Likes: 1,664
From: Blairsville GA
So many barrack's room lawyers, none of them bothering to check: Sturgis is in Meade County.
#25
07-23-2009 | 10:50 AM
Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,481
Likes: 3
From: Georgia
Skydrifter said: So excuse me but I am willing to give up some rights so this doesn't happen to anyone else.
#26
07-23-2009 | 11:02 AM
Road Captain
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 647
Likes: 4
From: Snohomish WA
You should walk in my shoes before you write such things.What about my right to free speech aHole
#27
07-23-2009 | 11:04 AM
Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,481
Likes: 3
From: Georgia
#28
07-23-2009 | 11:14 AM
Road Captain
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 647
Likes: 4
From: Snohomish WA
I think you would be whistling a different tune if this had happened to your loved ones. I can't call on my big brother anymore.
The following users liked this post:
DuciDay (03-25-2024)
#29
07-23-2009 | 11:17 AM
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,716
Likes: 102
From:
I am not advocating drunk driving, but my take on this entire mess is this. If you cause a wreck, what difference does it make how you caused it? If I rear end you while not having my full attention to my driving not much is going to happen. If I rear end you and cause the same damage but have been drinking, well all hell is going to break loose.
I feel that the penalty should be the same for the same result. Regardless of how you arrived at that result.
There was a kid that killed three people while text messaging, his penalty. He was on Oprah saying how bad text messaging was. Try and get that penalty if you had a drink.
I feel that the penalty should be the same for the same result. Regardless of how you arrived at that result.
There was a kid that killed three people while text messaging, his penalty. He was on Oprah saying how bad text messaging was. Try and get that penalty if you had a drink.
Dude you need to run for congress, you got my vote.
#30
07-23-2009 | 11:18 AM
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,476
Likes: 3
From: Republic of Texas
Never experienced a sobriety check point moment on the road yet. I have had to stop for a border patrol check points several times traveling down a Texas highway. I thought it was a waste of my time and intrusive. I would think the same of a sobriety or safety check point. It all borders on police state mentality and population movement control. Disgusting with limited success of making a difference while creating anger toward law enforcement. Sobriety check points are some more of that madd bull crap.
Last edited by oldairboater; 07-23-2009 at 11:35 AM.