General Harley Davidson Chat Forum to discuss general Harley Davidson issues, topics, and experiences.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Helmet Crash data damage %

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #71  
Old 10-14-2009, 06:21 PM
ShockwaveTXB's Avatar
ShockwaveTXB
ShockwaveTXB is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 27540
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

That's why I got a full face for anytime I know I'll be on the highway...
 
  #72  
Old 10-14-2009, 06:29 PM
CWO4's Avatar
CWO4
CWO4 is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mass
Posts: 218
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Great, I just spent the bucks for two half helmets and after this thread I'll be getting FF.
 
  #73  
Old 10-14-2009, 08:50 PM
eleutheros's Avatar
eleutheros
eleutheros is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ca
Posts: 1,014
Received 34 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99octane
Sure. Just, it's not ONE call. There are many. Some avoidable. Some not.
I am happy to avoid the avoidable.
A helmet turns a matter of WHEN in a matter of IF.
That's good enough for me.

BTW, in Italy there is no helmet/no helmet issue. Helmet is mandatory. You don't wear it, the gov takes your bike. It's that simple. So, political struggle over the topic is non existent. This means statistics are gathered for statistical (not political) purpose, and are therefore quite reliable.
About 30% of fatalities in bike accidents are due to head injury, and would have survived with no consequence had they worn a helmet.
I personally know 2 people who would be "normal" (vs. head trauma victims) had they worn a safety cycling helmet.
Both fell from a stationary bicicle (so, you can never tell).
I also find pretty amazing how otherwise sensible people can be fooled into believing the "Helmets protect you just till 14 mph" thing.
Personally I had never even heard of the 14 mph thing until last week when I read the scientific article. Now you say you don't believe it. Just goes to show you there are 2 sides to the story. I only care about the facts, which is not wearing a more expensive helmet, but rather training, experience, and avoidance. Transportation riding is just that. It's not race track. cafe racers were designed for the race track, but look so racy that people want them for traffic, and then race. Full face helmets are right for the race track, not commuting. I hope this ignorant shift to full face helmets doesn't become law before I get to old to ride. I also hope the whole country doesn't fall for the tired old (and very untrue) story of all these brain dead people. Riding a motorcycle is a more dangerous life choice than some choices, but not as dangerous as some other choices. As those Fla stats show, helmets are not going to save us. Some people want more gear. Fine. Please don't make the rest of us do it.
 
  #74  
Old 10-14-2009, 08:55 PM
Joe477's Avatar
Joe477
Joe477 is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Northern MN
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I ride backward on my bike to aviod the issue!!!!
 
  #75  
Old 10-15-2009, 06:05 AM
CherryHog's Avatar
CherryHog
CherryHog is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: west of the west side of Indy, many miles from nowhere
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My full face chin bar saved my jaw on a head-on years ago....nuff said.
 
  #76  
Old 10-15-2009, 12:58 PM
99octane's Avatar
99octane
99octane is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eleutheros
Personally I had never even heard of the 14 mph thing until last week when I read the scientific article. Now you say you don't believe it. Just goes to show you there are 2 sides to the story.
Sorry if I made myself unclear and put it down badly.
I don't say that I don't believe it (which would be trying to pass an opinion as a fact), I quote research that demonstrates scientifically that it isn't true.
You may find interesting reading the MAIDS.
http://www.maids-study.eu/
or at least the conclusions.
Helmets are studied to protect the head from the impact of a FALL, and that's the same at any speed.
If you crash into something, that's another thing entirely.


I only care about the facts, which is not wearing a more expensive helmet, but rather training, experience, and avoidance.
I also care about the facts. If I'd expected unavoidably to crash I wouldn't gear up: I just wouldn't ride.
Safety has two components: prevention and damage control.
A helmet is damage control. I'd rather not need it, and I'm totally, absolutely with you in saying that safety is not reducing your wounds when you crash, safety is NOT to crash.
But, I have enough personal experience to know it's not all in my hands. You can do everything right, and end up kissing the tarmac anyway, just because somebody else was so dork that nobody could prevent him from doing harm to somebody and, by blind bad luck, that somebody is you.
So, just in case, I also try to minimize possible damage. Within reasonable limits.
It doesn't add much, but my grandpa used to say (roughly translated from milanese dialect) that a dime is better than a kick in the ****.

What "reasonable" means, that should be up to one's choice.
Some won't be happy without full leather gear and protections, other are happy with a pair of goggles.

Transportation riding is just that. It's not race track. cafe racers were designed for the race track, but look so racy that people want them for traffic, and then race. Full face helmets are right for the race track, not commuting. I hope this ignorant shift to full face helmets doesn't become law before I get to old to ride. I also hope the whole country doesn't fall for the tired old (and very untrue) story of all these brain dead people. Riding a motorcycle is a more dangerous life choice than some choices, but not as dangerous as some other choices. As those Fla stats show, helmets are not going to save us. Some people want more gear. Fine. Please don't make the rest of us do it.
Well, again I agree with you about the abusrd tendence to try to "race" in traffic, and if you feel that way about cafe' racers, you should see what they do here with scooters and mopeds!
Freakin' psychos!
But it's not just a matter of racing. You are moving forward, facing forward. It's unavoidable that most of the impacts involve the forward area of the head. Add to this that, should you fall sideways, your instinct makes you turn your head to look where you are falling, and you get a pretty high chance of hitting the gorund in the stated area of the helmet.
Statistical findings corroborate theory: about one third of head impacts are in the face/jaw area.

Anyway on very hot climate, I go for half helmet myself. Can't stand the heat in a full face.
 

Last edited by 99octane; 10-15-2009 at 01:00 PM.
  #77  
Old 10-15-2009, 08:49 PM
eleutheros's Avatar
eleutheros
eleutheros is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ca
Posts: 1,014
Received 34 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99octane
Some won't be happy without full leather gear and protections, others are happy with a pair of goggles.

Statistical findings corroborate theory: about one third of head impacts are in the face/jaw area.
Great reply, 99octane, everything you said. To me, I just can't protect myself enough, and I can overprotect myself to the point of having less chance of avoiding an accident, not to mention spending a fortune I don't have. I'll worry about being comfortable and alert. What I wear should help me control the bike better, like gloves for gripping, boots that don't slip, glasses with excellent peripheral vision, and a 3/4 helmet to reduce wind noise.

I don't want to see any of those people happy with goggles, unless they at least have shorts also.
 
  #78  
Old 10-16-2009, 06:39 AM
dog155's Avatar
dog155
dog155 is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Windham,Maine
Posts: 13,389
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oct1949
Couple months ago while I was in the hospital talking bout riding with a nurse taking care of me asked me if I wore a helmet?
Then she asked me if I knew what the staff in ER called riders who didn't wear one was called....Then she said----



DONORS
Funny how we all look at this from different points of view.Been riding since 62 and always felt safer without a skid lid.Especially over the years knowing how many bikers have been disabled and a few even died because of a helmet.Funnier still why these statistics never get published.Must be the people or Co's gathering the info(statistics) have something they are trying to sell.
 
  #79  
Old 10-16-2009, 08:07 AM
Paniolo's Avatar
Paniolo
Paniolo is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by glideridemike
Obvious is right. The one stat I have never seen with any accuracy is how many riders who crash while wearing lids, and survive, have much of life after they heal. At what speed do they actually protect not only your life, but your quality of life. Living as a veg in bed isn't my thing. At 70 mph will a helmet really make a diff? At 55? At 45?...etc.
I used to ask the same question too. Then earlier this year I had a rider in one of my Ride Like A Pro classes. He was talking about his accident that left him with a broken ankle. He went down at 70mph on the freeway in full leathers and a full face. He said he remembers hearing "Thunk, thunk, thunk, thunk" as he went tumbling. A passer by who stopped told him they saw his head bouncing like a ball between the pavement and the concrete barrier. His whole helmet was trashed, ALL OVER. Not an inch was spared. He was sore all over and had a broken ankle but other than that he was fine. He said the full face helmet saved his life. So I guess protection can work up to 70 mph. Even more if you watch those GPZ racers. On the other extreme, I know of a rider who was killed and the bike was not moving. We talked about this all the time when I was an MSF Rider Coach. Someone did the old "Hey Bubba, lemme sit on your bike and see how it is" thing. This rider straddled the bike without wearing a helmet, lost his balance, fell over and smacked his head on the pavement and died.

Now before anyone jumps on me about being the "safety taking away your right to choose police", I'm not. I'm just sharing what I know. There are a million stories in the naked city and yours may be different.

By the way, I own a full face, a 3/4 and a half-helmet. I wear the half helmet most of the time.
 
  #80  
Old 10-16-2009, 08:40 AM
MidnitEvil's Avatar
MidnitEvil
MidnitEvil is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Joliet, Illinois
Posts: 6,235
Received 60 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dog155
... always felt safer without a skid lid.Especially over the years knowing how many bikers have been disabled and a few even died because of a helmet.
Not so much funny, as sad, that there are people who insist on misinforming new riders with these myths.

How many riders do you know of who were disabled or died because of a helmet.

(Free hint... in all the years of NASCAR, all the crashes, there has been ONE driver who was disabled or died because of his helmet)

Take all the time you need.

Funnier still why these statistics never get published. Must be the people or Co's gathering the info(statistics) have something they are trying to sell.
It's actually very understandable, there are no statistics because it doesn't happen.
 

Last edited by MidnitEvil; 10-16-2009 at 09:29 AM.


Quick Reply: Helmet Crash data damage %



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 PM.