General Harley Davidson Chat Forum to discuss general Harley Davidson issues, topics, and experiences.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New here, sportster question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-09-2009, 01:37 PM
HDIron's Avatar
HDIron
HDIron is offline
Novice
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: So. California
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default New here, sportster question

Been looking at the new IRON 883, 883 low and the nightster. I am looking for info on whats the best one to get? Just going to use it around town and maybe to work a few times during the summer. I'm 47 years old, 5'8" and 175 lbs. sat on the bike and it fits me fine. I have also seen alot of nightsters used with real low miles. I don't know what to think about them? Good/bad? Any help or thoughts would be great.
 
  #2  
Old 05-09-2009, 02:00 PM
faber's Avatar
faber
faber is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nomad
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Any Sportster would be a fun town bike. And with a little bit of add-on modification, you could make it a fun weekender, too.

As far as I know, the differences between the Iron and the Nightster are style and displacement (the Iron is an 883cc and the Nightster is a 1200cc). While some will say there isn't much of a difference, there is one. An 883L would be fun, too. Different styling than the Iron, but fun.

An 883 will get the best mileage of any Harley, but a 1200 is not far behind.

The "L" Sportsters are marketed for shorter, lighter riders. The suspension is lowered as is the seat thickness. You're plenty tall enough for a "regular" Sportster and it's full-travel suspension, which at your weight you'll like.

Check out the Sportster section of this forum and ask all the new Iron owners what they think of their rides. Plenty of Nightster riders there, too.

Welcome to the forum!
 
  #3  
Old 05-09-2009, 02:39 PM
DannyZ71's Avatar
DannyZ71
DannyZ71 is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Posts: 12,655
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

It's all about what you like. The Iron, in my opinion, looks better than the Nightster (and I loved the Nightster when it came out). The Nightster has more power, but with the way you plan to ride, do you need that extra power? The Iron will get good gas mileage, look great, and costs way less than 10 grand. You decide.
 
  #4  
Old 05-09-2009, 03:04 PM
57RebelRocker's Avatar
57RebelRocker
57RebelRocker is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 8,280
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

both are great bikes for what you are wanting
 
  #5  
Old 05-09-2009, 04:34 PM
Monochrome's Avatar
Monochrome
Monochrome is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think they are both good looking machines, the Iron in particular, from my general experience of bikes all other things being roughly equal I would go with the one with the most power. I once downgraded on engine size and even though I loved the bike (it was a Triumph Speedmaster 865cc) within 12 months I had traded it for a more powerful ride. Then again if it is a first bike you won't know the difference so the Iron will feel plenty powerful (for awhile anyway
 
  #6  
Old 05-09-2009, 04:42 PM
oct1949's Avatar
oct1949
oct1949 is offline
Club Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northeast of Indy..
Posts: 145,895
Received 819 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

with new, U got trade in money back, with used U can get more bike and motor. all depends on what U want..
 
  #7  
Old 05-09-2009, 04:53 PM
GPHDXLC's Avatar
GPHDXLC
GPHDXLC is offline
Grand HDF Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lansing mi
Posts: 4,490
Received 367 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

My self I love chrome so I have the XL-C.
I like both the Nightster and the Iron, I think the Iron looks just a little more cool, but not by much. I can only tell you what I would do. Nightster has a 1200 motor that's the one I would get. You can get a low with a 1200 too. I like the power of the 1200, but that may not be impotent to you.
You need to decide which one fits you the best... Good luck.
 

Last edited by GPHDXLC; 05-09-2009 at 04:57 PM.
  #8  
Old 05-09-2009, 06:31 PM
codyshop's Avatar
codyshop
codyshop is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Personally, I would never buy a 1200 new. You're much better off buying an 883 and immediately doing the 1200 conversion with Wiseco pistons. This way, you have a much faster bike than the stock 1200 and you're still ahead of the game by almost $1500. Just my two bits...
 
  #9  
Old 05-09-2009, 06:37 PM
SecretAgent's Avatar
SecretAgent
SecretAgent is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by codyshop
Personally, I would never buy a 1200 new. You're much better off buying an 883 and immediately doing the 1200 conversion with Wiseco pistons. This way, you have a much faster bike than the stock 1200 and you're still ahead of the game by almost $1500. Just my two bits...
from what i understand they redesigned the 09 883's to where you can no longer bore the cylinders to do the cheap easy 1200 conversion. you have to purchase new cylinders to do it now.
 
  #10  
Old 05-09-2009, 06:49 PM
DannyZ71's Avatar
DannyZ71
DannyZ71 is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Posts: 12,655
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Yeah, I think I heard somewhere that the cylinder sleeves are much thinner, thus can't be bored out. But, that's just what I've heard.
 


Quick Reply: New here, sportster question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 PM.