Did *anyone* really fall in love with the Rocker?
#142
11-26-2008, 12:07 PM
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North of Hell, South of Heaven
Posts: 5,737
Received 350 Likes
on
217 Posts
That does look better. The plain wrapper Rocker is just awful looking, The "C" version is better. Personally, I don't see it as a good fit for Harley. If this is the style you want, spend a little more cash at your dealer and get a Thunder Mountain.
#143
11-26-2008, 01:10 PM
I liked the Rocker when I test rode one,but there again it was not comfortable for long,Harley forgets who's got the money for these bikes,and it's usally not some long armed young punk.
#144
11-28-2008, 10:25 PM
love my rock you dont like it? i dont care tell ya'll what everywhere i go people
always compliment me while every other bike around is just the same ol same ol
oh yeah im a long arm punk from way back
#145
11-28-2008, 10:34 PM
I think they look cool, not sure on what they'd feel like ride'n for a couple hours. The bike that strikes me as one ugly duckling is the cross bones. Now there is one ugly bike! Looks like some sort of mutated mini bike! My apologies to all that have bought one now........
#146
11-29-2008, 01:03 PM
Cruiser
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Currently stationed in New Mexico
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That a boy m i k e!!!! I guess I'm a 6'6"...270lb...long arm punk too!!! Went riding yesterday in 31 degree weather... great ride!!!!!!!!
#147
11-29-2008, 05:08 PM
Couldn't agree more. The original with the stock seat is hideous! Just one opinion, and I'd never buy one! But I don't think I'm their target audience.
#149
12-15-2008, 08:45 AM
2nd Gear
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lubbock Texas
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
take a look at my rocker and you may change your mind HAHA or maybe not!! The seat is probably the worst part about them but i put a gel insert in mine and it makes a HUGE difference!!!
