Thats what I'm talking about,sometimes the simpler systems are the BEST solution.Back in the 60/70's if you wanted realibility you bought a shaft driven bike.I was skeptical at first but the BELT is a reliable and simpler solution.

 

Hardpill brought up a good question regarding the new Softails with 200 rear tire. I have been giving some serious consideration to going to a 124" build, but I just don't know if that narrow belt would take it.

I was following a bike the other day and saw that 1-1/2" belt compared to mine, and it's got me thinking that maybe I better not go more than 107". I'm not planning a super hi-horsepower build, something more for low-end torque. I'd also planned to do a gearing change at the same time but I really wonder how much torque that narrow belt can handle? Any opinions?

One thing I am determined NOT to do is go to a chain, I love the minimal maintenance that a belt requires.

 

gtnot did you read this?

 

I would agree that a well maintained belt drive is the way to go. Except, if you live on a long gravel road to pavement, or With a serious high hp/torque bike w/ narrow(7/8") belt. I know of one guy w/ a 124" S&S that snapped three of the narrow belts before switching to a chain drive. He said he actually could snap them at will.

 

Rawhide, I did read that. My question deals with the narrow belt on 200 series softails. I don't believe (I may be wrong on this) that dog155's bike has the narrow belt. There is a lot of difference between 7/8" and 1-1/2" belts, hence my concern about reliability.

I did put this question (124" build on the narrow belt) to one of the well-respected engine shops (which I will not name) and they said "no problem". Then I read WrenchinRider's post. I suppose this is one of those "YMMV" situations, the only way I will KNOW is to go ahead and try...but I really don't want to end up with the chain.

And, sorry for hijacking this thread...my bad.

 

I have a low mileage '86 with the original belt - no problems. That's 23 years I think, so age hasn't broken it.

 

A friend has a new Harley something something,with 110" motor and it came with a 1" or less belt.He has done several burnouts for my benefit.Again, the belt material today is incredibly strong.It did take a long time before I became a believer.Good Luck

 

The skinney belts are scarey. Why did they go skinney? A save money. B fatter tire C belts are so strong no need for them to be bigger I would hope it was for C but I doubt it.

 

Switch from a belt to a chain? You'd have to be out of your mind. I don't miss the chain drive at all.