It's gone!!
#51
And I'm not down of the Harley brand. I love em. I wouldn't own the Rocket if I hadn't been a Harley owner previously.
I've bought a shed load of lotto tickets this week. If my numbers come up there'll be a stage 4 RKS ordered, in black, before the cheque clears, and probably a green card application going in so I can get the bloody parts without involving Boeing and import taxes....
The following 3 users liked this post by Gimlet:
#52
I think you can do the 240hp kit for around 5K USD give or take if you do your own install. I really want one.
But I am content with the 220hp that my Ducati has for when I get the speed bug, I just think it would be hilarious to have a rocket setup for track use with a blower.
But I am content with the 220hp that my Ducati has for when I get the speed bug, I just think it would be hilarious to have a rocket setup for track use with a blower.
I sold a KTM 1290 Superduke to buy the LRS and I still own a proddy race-tuned Ducati 1098 Streetfighter and a KTM 1190, so I definitely have the speed demon gene as well. I've never been attracted to track riding - though I'd like to track the Ducati, if ever tightening UK noise restrictions hadn't placed it out of bounds - but I am a fast road rider and I love ragging my tyres and turning them blue. But it's getting increasingly hard to do that on UK roads and I bought the Harley to provide a contrast to that tendency and add another dimension to my biking life that was missing. I wanted a bike that would let me enjoy where I was riding as much as what I was riding. The Harley did that in spades. It was just my back issue that killed the dream.
For me, the only close alternative to a properly sorted Harley was a Rocket 3 GT. It's a stage 4 big inch Harley out of the crate in a slightly different flavour, but about 8 grand cheaper and without the low seat softail ergos that my ruined body can't deal with. But I still want some Milwaukee iron in the garage. When I've got the Rocket fettled and replenished the finances a 1200 Sportster project bike is next on the list.
#53
That's it in a nutshell. I was riding the Triumph yesterday and encountered some really sudden dips in the road. I saw them coming and was able to take my weight off the seat with my legs and by pulling on the bars. I couldn't do that on the LRS. If I'd hit them on that I'd have been crippled.
The Rocket has a conventional rear sub-frame. The seat is higher and your knees lower, the forwards are less "forward" (and can be moved further back) and the bars are closer. A softail by it's nature will always have a low seat height and there's little you can do about it if you've got a problem like mine. A Dyna or twin shock bagger would have worked for me, but I don't want a full-dress bagger. The RKS would be perfect but I can't afford one.
I did ride the Rocket over to my local HD dealership on Friday to try a few Harleys for size straight after getting off the Rocket to make sure I hadn't made a mistake. All of them except the RKS gave me the warning signal when I sat of them. The RKS's seat was way more comfortable than the Rocket's, but a used RKS costs about the same as a new Rocket. One day maybe.
The Rocket has a conventional rear sub-frame. The seat is higher and your knees lower, the forwards are less "forward" (and can be moved further back) and the bars are closer. A softail by it's nature will always have a low seat height and there's little you can do about it if you've got a problem like mine. A Dyna or twin shock bagger would have worked for me, but I don't want a full-dress bagger. The RKS would be perfect but I can't afford one.
I did ride the Rocket over to my local HD dealership on Friday to try a few Harleys for size straight after getting off the Rocket to make sure I hadn't made a mistake. All of them except the RKS gave me the warning signal when I sat of them. The RKS's seat was way more comfortable than the Rocket's, but a used RKS costs about the same as a new Rocket. One day maybe.
If I was serious about buying a new Harley right now, a police Road King is what I would look for.
#54
No one buys a new motorcycles, and then thinks what can I do to make myself think it was a mistake. Sure
#55
Someone else told me that - at the dealership, funnily enough. But I've never seen on over here.
The following users liked this post:
RK4ME (08-06-2024)
#57
I've had this back issue for decades and I've got to know exactly what sets it off. [b]The real problem is seat height and the degree of bend in my hips. [.b] I'm the same with car seats and armchairs in the house. If I sit too low with my hips too bent, at some point I'm going to be in deep trouble.
The mids on the LRS make this worse but even with forwards I've got too much bend in my hips. I did fit a Tallboy seat (in fact I ordered one when I bought the bike, just in case). And I rolled the bars back to bring them nearer. Both these things helped a lot but they can't eliminate that tight hip angle.
The Triumph has a higher seat height. You're much more on the bike than in it and my thighs are level or even angled downwards. The forwards aren't as far forward as most Harleys either and they're adjustable by two inches fore and aft. It's taller and you're not sitting as stretched out as a Harley and unfortunately my back dictates the seat posture.
The Triumph's suspension is pretty stiff - most Triumphs are. I can sure feel the bumps but the sitting position means they're not being transferred into my spine the way they were on the LRS. That's the difference.
The mids on the LRS make this worse but even with forwards I've got too much bend in my hips. I did fit a Tallboy seat (in fact I ordered one when I bought the bike, just in case). And I rolled the bars back to bring them nearer. Both these things helped a lot but they can't eliminate that tight hip angle.
The Triumph has a higher seat height. You're much more on the bike than in it and my thighs are level or even angled downwards. The forwards aren't as far forward as most Harleys either and they're adjustable by two inches fore and aft. It's taller and you're not sitting as stretched out as a Harley and unfortunately my back dictates the seat posture.
The Triumph's suspension is pretty stiff - most Triumphs are. I can sure feel the bumps but the sitting position means they're not being transferred into my spine the way they were on the LRS. That's the difference.
The following users liked this post:
Gimlet (08-06-2024)
#58
Remember how they made a "Low" version of some touring models for a few years? I always wished they'd make a "High" version for us taller folk. But they were probably afraid of losing the signature Harley "slammed" look.
The following users liked this post:
Gimlet (08-06-2024)
#59
I very much doubt if I'll ever go that far, though I will fit a decat exhaust and have it custom mapped to restore a 1:1 throttle and make it the bike Triumph would have built if the politicians would have let them, just as I was planning to do with my Harley.
I sold a KTM 1290 Superduke to buy the LRS and I still own a proddy race-tuned Ducati 1098 Streetfighter and a KTM 1190, so I definitely have the speed demon gene as well. I've never been attracted to track riding - though I'd like to track the Ducati, if ever tightening UK noise restrictions hadn't placed it out of bounds - but I am a fast road rider and I love ragging my tyres and turning them blue. But it's getting increasingly hard to do that on UK roads and I bought the Harley to provide a contrast to that tendency and add another dimension to my biking life that was missing. I wanted a bike that would let me enjoy where I was riding as much as what I was riding. The Harley did that in spades. It was just my back issue that killed the dream.
For me, the only close alternative to a properly sorted Harley was a Rocket 3 GT. It's a stage 4 big inch Harley out of the crate in a slightly different flavour, but about 8 grand cheaper and without the low seat softail ergos that my ruined body can't deal with. But I still want some Milwaukee iron in the garage. When I've got the Rocket fettled and replenished the finances a 1200 Sportster project bike is next on the list.
I sold a KTM 1290 Superduke to buy the LRS and I still own a proddy race-tuned Ducati 1098 Streetfighter and a KTM 1190, so I definitely have the speed demon gene as well. I've never been attracted to track riding - though I'd like to track the Ducati, if ever tightening UK noise restrictions hadn't placed it out of bounds - but I am a fast road rider and I love ragging my tyres and turning them blue. But it's getting increasingly hard to do that on UK roads and I bought the Harley to provide a contrast to that tendency and add another dimension to my biking life that was missing. I wanted a bike that would let me enjoy where I was riding as much as what I was riding. The Harley did that in spades. It was just my back issue that killed the dream.
For me, the only close alternative to a properly sorted Harley was a Rocket 3 GT. It's a stage 4 big inch Harley out of the crate in a slightly different flavour, but about 8 grand cheaper and without the low seat softail ergos that my ruined body can't deal with. But I still want some Milwaukee iron in the garage. When I've got the Rocket fettled and replenished the finances a 1200 Sportster project bike is next on the list.
I just have a tendency to like to screw around with my bikes and make them faster.
The following users liked this post:
Gimlet (08-06-2024)
#60
https://www.hdforums.com/forum/detai...ph-rocket.html
OP, grats on the new ride
The following users liked this post:
Gimlet (08-06-2024)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TykeFXBRS
2018+ Softail Models
9
08-14-2021 11:22 AM
turbotom1052
General Harley Davidson Chat
12
03-11-2016 08:19 AM