150 people let go recently from Harley-Davidson.
#41
#42
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pine Flat Dam/South Bay Area, CA
Posts: 12,012
Received 24,595 Likes
on
7,983 Posts
In 1989, touring bikes weren't very popular as they were viewed as bikes for old people. FXR's were popular in the Bay Area because that's what the club primarily was riding and that's what the tough guys rode. There was a waiting list to buy one and discounts weren't offered.
#43
were you rich in '89?
plug in some numbers
Inflation Calculator | Find US Dollar's Value From 1913-2024 (usinflationcalculator.com)
Harleys have always been an expensive bike to buy new
..L.T.A.
The following users liked this post:
AussieDog (07-05-2024)
#44
Before my time. My understanding Harleys were always expensive. But did people buy and sell and trade as often? Did you save up, and got your bike?
I was 28 when I got my FLH, I went without things to get it. I learned to wrench cause I couldn't offered to bring in. And maybe that is the difference in the types of riders we have today.
Did a guy in those days strive, to get "his" Harley? Not a factor of income,but what he did with his income.
I was 28 when I got my FLH, I went without things to get it. I learned to wrench cause I couldn't offered to bring in. And maybe that is the difference in the types of riders we have today.
Did a guy in those days strive, to get "his" Harley? Not a factor of income,but what he did with his income.
#45
Work ethic, Talent, Hard work. Forget it, I have seniority. Pass a Donut. See how that works both ways?
The following 4 users liked this post by aecs:
BrandonSmith (07-02-2024),
MarlinSpike (07-02-2024),
Rusty Springs (07-02-2024),
shogunbikes (07-03-2024)
#46
#47
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: On the Big Blue marble
Posts: 8,728
Received 4,912 Likes
on
2,437 Posts
The following 7 users liked this post by uncle kebo:
BrandonSmith (07-02-2024),
DMFXR (07-02-2024),
GBHH (07-02-2024),
Goose_NC (07-02-2024),
Oko (07-08-2024),
and 2 others liked this post.
#48
The rank & file workers didn’t have a need to kiss management's ***, to the point that they messed with the managers as sport. It was a great place to work.
The following users liked this post:
Dan89FLSTC (07-02-2024)
#49
I worked in a large Union operation. Other than a few notable exceptions, most of the work force were really good at what they did, they strived to improve and took great pride in their work. As you would expect there were obvious examples of the Peter Principle at work… those examples generally moved to management!
The rank & file workers didn’t have a need to kiss management's ***, to the point that they messed with the managers as sport. It was a great place to work.
The rank & file workers didn’t have a need to kiss management's ***, to the point that they messed with the managers as sport. It was a great place to work.
Pro union people might be surprised how this goes on.
I also think for decades less of union taking promotions to management. They want the protection and money. This is to bad, with respect to not getting supervisors who know the job, or a place for old workers with knowledge,but old, to finish career.
#50
Wife used to bring home these shade sample sticks and at first thought I was playing a game. Then she finally realized I am color blind and cannot see colors like others do. Those shade samples all looked the same to me.
Last edited by Goose_NC; 07-02-2024 at 07:48 AM.